19 research outputs found

    Capturing sets of ordinals by normal ultrapowers

    Full text link
    We investigate the extent to which ultrapowers by normal measures on \kappa can be correct about powersets P()\mathcal{P}(\lambda) for >\lambda>\kappa. We consider two versions of this questions, the capturing property CP(,)\mathrm{CP}(\kappa,\lambda) and the local capturing property LCP(,)\mathrm{LCP}(\kappa,\lambda). CP(,)\mathrm{CP}(\kappa,\lambda) holds if there is an ultrapower by a normal measure on \kappa which correctly computes P()\mathcal{P}(\lambda). LCP(,)\mathrm{LCP}(\kappa,\lambda) is a weakening of CP(,)\mathrm{CP}(\kappa,\lambda) which holds if every subset of \lambda is contained in some ultrapower by a normal measure on \kappa. After examining the basic properties of these two notions, we identify the exact consistency strength of LCP(,+)\mathrm{LCP}(\kappa,\kappa^+). Building on results of Cummings, who determined the exact consistency strength of CP(,+)\mathrm{CP}(\kappa,\kappa^+), and using a forcing due to Apter and Shelah, we show that CP(,)\mathrm{CP}(\kappa,\lambda) can hold at the least measurable cardinal.Comment: 20 page

    On what I do not understand (and have something to say): Part I

    Full text link
    This is a non-standard paper, containing some problems in set theory I have in various degrees been interested in. Sometimes with a discussion on what I have to say; sometimes, of what makes them interesting to me, sometimes the problems are presented with a discussion of how I have tried to solve them, and sometimes with failed tries, anecdote and opinion. So the discussion is quite personal, in other words, egocentric and somewhat accidental. As we discuss many problems, history and side references are erratic, usually kept at a minimum (``see ... '' means: see the references there and possibly the paper itself). The base were lectures in Rutgers Fall'97 and reflect my knowledge then. The other half, concentrating on model theory, will subsequently appear

    Set Theory

    Get PDF
    This workshop included selected talks on pure set theory and its applications, simultaneously showing diversity and coherence of the subject

    Sums, numbers and infinity:Collections in Bolzano's mathematics and philosophy

    Get PDF
    This dissertation is a collection of essays almost exclusively focussing on Bernard Bolzano's theory of collections, and its connections to his conception of mathematics. The first significant contribution of this work is that it develops a novel approach for comparing and appraising Bolzano鈥檚 collections against the alternatives offered by set theory and mereology. This approach consists in focusing not on the metaphysical comparison but on the role Bolzano's collections play in his mathematics vis 脿 vis the role the sets of set theory (ZFC) play for modern-day mathematics. The second important contribution of this dissertation is a novel interpretation of the interaction between Bolzano's theory of concepts on the one hand, and his way of comparing the size of infinite collections of natural numbers on the other. This culminates in a completely new interpretation of Bolzano's famous Paradoxes of the Infinite as a work that is not an anticipation of Cantorian set theory, but an attempt at deploying philosophical insights on the infinite to develop a sound treatment of infinite series, both converging and diverging ones
    corecore