Perceptibility and acceptability of JPEG 2000 compressed images of various scene types

This investigation examines the relationships between image fidelity, acceptability thresholds and scene content for images distorted by lossy compression. Scene characteristics of a sample set of images, with a wide range of representative scene content, were quantified, using simple measures (scene metrics), which had been previously found to correlate with global scene lightness, global contrast, busyness, and colorfulness. Images were compressed using the lossy JPEG 2000 algorithm to a range of compression ratios, progressively introducing distortion to levels beyond the threshold of detection. Twelve observers took part in a paired comparison experiment to evaluate the perceptibility threshold compression ratio. A further psychophysical experiment was conducted using the same scenes, compressed to higher compression ratios, to identify the level of compression at which the images became visually unacceptable. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were significantly correlated for the test image set; both thresholds also correlated with the busyness metric. Images were ranked for the two thresholds and were further grouped, based upon the relationships between perceptibility and acceptability. Scene content and the results from the scene descriptors were examined within the groups to determine the influence of specific common scene characteristics upon both thresholds

Studying the effect of optimizing image quality in salient regions at the expense of background content

Manufacturers of commercial display devices continuously try to improve the perceived image quality of their products. By applying postprocessing techniques on the incoming signal, they aim to enhance the quality level perceived by the viewer. These postprocessing techniques are usually applied globally over the whole image but may cause side effects, the visibility and annoyance of which differ with local content characteristics. To better understand and utilize this, a three-phase experiment was conducted where observers were asked to score images that had different levels of quality in their regions of interest and in the background areas. The results show that the region of interest has a greater effect on the overall quality of the image than the background. This effect increases with the increasing quality difference between the two regions. Based on the subjective data we propose a model to predict the overall quality of images with different quality levels in different regions. This model, which is constructed on empirical bases, can help craft weighted objective metrics that can better approximate subjective quality scores.Intelligent SystemsElectrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Scienc

Are All Pixels Equally Important? Towards Multi-Level Salient Object Detection

When we look at our environment, we primarily pay attention to visually distinctive objects. We refer to these objects as visually important or salient. Our visual system dedicates most of its processing resources to analyzing these salient objects. An analogous resource allocation can be performed in computer vision, where a salient object detector identifies objects of interest as a pre-processing step. In the literature, salient object detection is considered as a foreground-background segmentation problem. This approach assumes that there is no variation in object importance. Only the most salient object(s) are detected as foreground. In this thesis, we challenge this conventional methodology of salient-object detection and introduce multi-level object saliency. In other words, all pixels are not equally important. The well-known salient-object ground-truth datasets contain images with single objects and thus are not suited to evaluate the varying importance of objects. In contrast, many natural images have multiple objects. The saliency levels of these objects depend on two key factors. First, the duration of eye fixation is longer for visually and semantically informative image regions. Therefore, a difference in fixation duration should reflect a variation in object importance. Second, visual perception is subjective; hence the saliency of an object should be measured by averaging the perception of a group of people. In other words, objective saliency can be considered as the collective human attention. In order to better represent natural images and to measure the saliency levels of objects, we thus collect new images containing multiple objects and create a Comprehensive Object Saliency (COS) dataset. We provide ground truth multi-level salient object maps via eye-tracking and crowd-sourcing experiments. We then propose three salient-object detectors. Our first technique is based on multi-scale linear filtering and can detect salient objects of various sizes. The second method uses a bilateral-filtering approach and is capable of producing uniform object saliency values. Our third method employs image segmentation and machine learning and is robust against image noise and texture. This segmentation-based method performs the best on the existing datasets compared to our other methods and the state-of-the-art methods. The state-of-the-art salient-object detectors are not designed to assess the relative importance of objects and to provide multi-level saliency values. We thus introduce an Object-Awareness Model (OAM) that estimates the saliency levels of objects by using their position and size information. We then modify and extend our segmentation-based salient-object detector with the OAM and propose a Comprehensive Salient Object Detection (CSD) method that is capable of performing multi-level salient-object detection. We show that the CSD method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on the COS dataset. We use our salient-object detectors as a pre-processing step in three applications. First, we show that multi-level salient-object detection provides more relevant semantic image tags compared to conventional salient-object detection. Second, we employ our salient-object detector to detect salient objects in videos in real time. Third, we use multi-level object-saliency values in context-aware image compression and obtain perceptually better compression compared to standard JPEG with the same file size

Image Quality Evaluation in Lossy Compressed Images

This research focuses on the quantification of image quality in lossy compressed images, exploring the impact of digital artefacts and scene characteristics upon image quality evaluation. A subjective paired comparison test was implemented to assess perceived quality of JPEG 2000 against baseline JPEG over a range of different scene types. Interval scales were generated for both algorithms, which indicated a subjective preference for JPEG 2000, particularly at low bit rates, and these were confirmed by an objective distortion measure. The subjective results did not follow this trend for some scenes however, and both algorithms were found to be scene dependent as a result of the artefacts produced at high compression rates. The scene dependencies were explored from the interval scale results, which allowed scenes to be grouped according to their susceptibilities to each of the algorithms. Groupings were correlated with scene measures applied in a linked study. A pilot study was undertaken to explore perceptibility thresholds of JPEG 2000 of the same set of images. This work was developed with a further experiment to investigate the thresholds of perceptibility and acceptability of higher resolution JPEG 2000 compressed images. A set of images was captured using a professional level full-frame Digital Single Lens Reflex camera, using a raw workflow and carefully controlled image-processing pipeline. The scenes were quantified using a set of simple scene metrics to classify them according to whether they were average, higher than, or lower than average, for a number of scene properties known to affect image compression and perceived image quality; these were used to make a final selection of test images. Image fidelity was investigated using the method of constant stimuli to quantify perceptibility thresholds and just noticeable differences (JNDs) of perceptibility. Thresholds and JNDs of acceptability were also quantified to explore suprathreshold quality evaluation. The relationships between the two thresholds were examined and correlated with the results from the scene measures, to identify more or less susceptible scenes. It was found that the level and differences between the two thresholds was an indicator of scene dependency and could be predicted by certain types of scene characteristics. A third study implemented the soft copy quality ruler as an alternative psychophysical method, by matching the quality of compressed images to a set of images varying in a single attribute, separated by known JND increments of quality. The imaging chain and image processing workflow were evaluated using objective measures of tone reproduction and spatial frequency response. An alternative approach to the creation of ruler images was implemented and tested, and the resulting quality rulers were used to evaluate a subset of the images from the previous study. The quality ruler was found to be successful in identifying scene susceptibilities and observer sensitivity. The fourth investigation explored the implementation of four different image quality metrics. These were the Modular Image Difference Metric, the Structural Similarity Metric, The Multi-scale Structural Similarity Metric and the Weighted Structural Similarity Metric. The metrics were tested against the subjective results and all were found to have linear correlation in terms of predictability of image quality