97,651 research outputs found

    Charities’ new non-financial reporting requirements: preparers’ insights

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this paper is to obtain insights from preparers on the new Performance Report requirements for New Zealand charities, in particular the non-financial information included in the ‘Entity Information’ section and the ‘Statement of Service Performance’ for Tier 3 and 4 charities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 interviewees, each involved with governance and reporting of one or more Tier 3 or Tier 4 charities. These interviews were analysed in terms of accountability and legitimacy objectives, which motivated the regulators to introduce the new reporting regime. Key findings are summarised under three themes. Manageability relates to perceptions and suggestions regarding implementation of the new requirements. Scepticism concerns some doubts raised by interviewees regarding the motivations for performance reports and the extent to which they will be used. Effects include concerns about potentially losing good charities and volunteers due to new requirements making their work ‘too hard’, although increased focus on outcomes creates the potential for continuous improvement. The subjectivity that is inherent in thematic analysis is acknowledged and also that multiple themes may sometimes be present in the sentences and paragraphs analysed. We acknowledge too that early viewpoints may change over time. Themes identified may assist regulators, professional bodies and support groups to respond to the views of preparers. Findings will also be of interest to parties in other jurisdictions who are considering the implementation of similar initiatives. This paper provides early insights on new reporting requirements entailing significant changes for New Zealand charities for financial periods beginning on or after April 2015. The focus is on small charities (97% of all New Zealand charities) and key aspects of the Performance Report: Entity information and the Statement of Service Performance.fals

    On the Pyhlogeny of Human Morality

    Get PDF

    A New 3-D automated computational method to evaluate in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in in-vivo intravascular optical coherence tomography pullbacks

    Get PDF
    Abstract. Detection of stent struts imaged in vivo by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and quantification of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) are important. In this paper, we present a new computational method to facilitate the physician in this endeavor to assess and compare new (drug-eluting) stents. We developed a new algorithm for stent strut detection and utilized splines to reconstruct the lumen and stent boundaries which provide automatic measurements of NIH thickness, lumen and stent area. Our original approach is based on the detection of stent struts unique characteristics: bright reflection and shadow behind. Furthermore, we present for the first time to our knowledge a rotation correction method applied across OCT cross-section images for 3D reconstruction and visualization of reconstructed lumen and stent boundaries for further analysis in the longitudinal dimension of the coronary artery. Our experiments over OCT cross-sections taken from 7 patients presenting varying degrees of NIH after PCI illustrate a good agreement between the computer method and expert evaluations: Bland-Altmann analysis revealed a mean difference for lumen cross-section area of 0.11 ± 0.70mm2 and for the stent cross-section area of 0.10 ± 1.28mm2

    Stent implant follow-up in intravascular optical coherence tomography images

    Get PDF
    The objectives of this article are (i) to utilize computer methods in detection of stent struts imaged in vivo by optical coherence tomography (OCT) during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI); (ii) to provide measurements for the assessment and monitoring of in-stent restenosis by OCT post PCI. Thirty-nine OCT cross-sections from seven pullbacks from seven patients presenting varying degrees of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) are selected, and stent struts are detected. Stent and lumen boundaries are reconstructed and one experienced observer analyzed the strut detection, the lumen and stent area measurements, as well as the NIH thickness in comparison to manual tracing using the reviewing software provided by the OCT manufacturer (LightLab Imaging, MA, USA). Very good agreements were found between the computer methods and the expert evaluations for lumen cross-section area (mean difference = 0.11 ± 0.70 mm2; r2 = 0.98, P\ 0.0001) and the stent cross-section area (mean difference = 0.10 ± 1.28 mm2; r2 = 0.85, P value\ 0.0001). The average number of detected struts was 10.4 ± 2.9 per crosssection when the expert identified 10.5 ± 2.8 (r2 = 0.78, P value\0.0001). For the given patient dataset: lumen cross-sectional area was on the average (6.05 ± 1.87 mm2), stent cross-sectional area was (6.26 ± 1.63 mm2), maximum angle between struts was on the average (85.96 ± 54.23), maximum, average, and minimum distance between the stent and the lumen were (0.18 ± 0.13 mm), (0.08 ± 0.06 mm), and (0.01 ± 0.02 mm), respectively, and stent eccentricity was (0.80 ± 0.08). Low variability between the expert and automatic method was observed in the computations of the most important parameters assessing the degree of neointimal tissue growth in stents imaged by OCT pullbacks. After further extensive validation, the presented methods might offer a robust automated tool that will improve the evaluation and follow-up monitoring of in-stent restenosis in patients
    • …
    corecore