Starvation Freedom in Multi-Version Transactional Memory Systems

Software Transactional Memory systems (STMs) have garnered significant interest as an elegant alternative for addressing synchronization and concurrency issues with multi-threaded programming in multi-core systems. In order for STMs to be efficient, they must guarantee some progress properties. This work explores the notion of starvation-freedom in Software Transactional Memory Systems (STMs). An STM system is said to be starvation-free if every thread invoking a transaction gets opportunity to take a step (due to the presence of a fair scheduler) then the transaction will eventually commit. A few starvation-free algorithms have been proposed in the literature in the context of single-version STM Systems. These algorithm work on the basis of priority. But the drawback with this approach is that if a set of high-priority transactions become slow then they can cause several other transactions to abort. Multi-version STMs maintain multiple-versions for each transactional object or t-object. By storing multiple versions, these systems can achieve greater concurrency. In this paper, we propose a multi-version starvation free STM, KSFTM, which as the name suggests achieves starvation freedom while storing K versions of each t-object. Here K is an input parameter fixed by the application programmer depending on the requirement. Our algorithm is dynamic which can support different values of K ranging from 1 to infinity . If K is infinity then there is no limit on the number of versions. But a separate garbage-collection mechanism is required to collect unwanted versions. On the other hand, when K is 1, it becomes same as a single-version STM system. We prove the correctness and starvation-freedom property of the proposed KSFTM algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multi-version STM system that is correct and satisfies starvation-freedom as well

Achieving Starvation-Freedom with Greater Concurrency in Multi-Version Object-based Transactional Memory Systems

To utilize the multi-core processors properly concurrent programming is needed. Concurrency control is the main challenge while designing a correct and efficient concurrent program. Software Transactional Memory Systems (STMs) provides ease of multithreading to the programmer without worrying about concurrency issues such as deadlock, livelock, priority inversion, etc. Most of the STMs works on read-write operations known as RWSTMs. Some STMs work at high-level operations and ensure greater concurrency than RWSTMs. Such STMs are known as Object-Based STMs (OSTMs). The transactions of OSTMs can return commit or abort. Aborted OSTMs transactions retry. But in the current setting of OSTMs, transactions may starve. So, we proposed a Starvation-Free OSTM (SF-OSTM) which ensures starvation-freedom in object based STM systems while satisfying the correctness criteria as co-opacity. Databases, RWSTMs and OSTMs say that maintaining multiple versions corresponding to each key of transaction reduces the number of aborts and improves the throughput. So, to achieve greater concurrency, we proposed Starvation-Free Multi-Version OSTM (SF-MVOSTM) which ensures starvation-freedom while storing multiple versions corresponding to each key and satisfies the correctness criteria such as local opacity. To show the performance benefits, We implemented three variants of SF-MVOSTM (SF-MVOSTM, SF-MVOSTM-GC and SF-KOSTM) and compared it with state-of-the-art STMs.Comment: 68 pages, 24 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1709.0103

Obtaining Progress Guarantee and GreaterConcurrency in Multi-Version Object Semantics

Software Transactional Memory Systems (STMs) provides ease of multithreading to the programmer withoutworrying about concurrency issues such as deadlock, livelock, priority inversion, etc. Most of the STMs workson read-write operations known as RWSTMs. Some STMs work at high-level operations and ensure greaterconcurrency than RWSTMs. Such STMs are known as Object-Based STMs (OSTMs). The transactions of OSTMscan return commit or abort. Aborted OSTMs transactions retry. But in the current setting of OSTMs, transactionsmay starve. So, we proposed a Starvation-Free OSTM (SF-OSTM) which ensures starvation-freedom whilesatisfying the correctness criteria as opacity.Databases, RWSTMs and OSTMs say that maintaining multiple versions corresponding to each key reduces thenumber of aborts and improves the throughput. So, to achieve the greater concurrency, we proposed Starvation-Free Multi-Version OSTM (SF-MVOSTM) which ensures starvation-freedom while storing multiple versioncorresponding to each key and satisfies the correctness criteria as local opacity. To show the performance benefits,We implemented three variants of SF-MVOSTM and compare its performance with state-of-the-art STM

Non-blocking Priority Queue based on Skiplists with Relaxed Semantics

Priority queues are data structures that store information in an orderly fashion. They are of tremendous importance because they are an integral part of many applications, like Dijkstra’s shortest path algorithm, MST algorithms, priority schedulers, and so on. Since priority queues by nature have high contention on the delete_min operation, the design of an efficient priority queue should involve an intelligent choice of the data structure as well as relaxation bounds on the data structure. Lock-free data structures provide higher scalability as well as progress guarantee than a lock-based data structure. That is another factor to be considered in the priority queue design. We present a relaxed non-blocking priority queue based on skiplists. We address all the design issues mentioned above in our priority queue. Use of skiplists allows multiple threads to concurrently access different parts of the skiplist quickly, whereas relaxing the priority queue delete_min operation distributes contention over the skiplist instead of just at the front. Furthermore, a non-blocking implementation guarantees that the system will make progress even when some process fails. Our priority queue is internally composed of several priority queues, one for each thread and one shared priority queue common to all threads. Each thread selects the best value from its local priority queue and the shared priority queue and returns the value. In case a thread is unable to delete an item, it tries to spy items from other threads\u27 local priority queues. We experimentally and theoretically show the correctness of our data structure. We also compare the performance of our data structure with other variations like priority queues based on coarse-grained skiplists for both relaxed and non-relaxed semantics

TM2C: A software transactional memory for many-cores

Transactional memory is an appealing paradigm for concurrent programming. Many software implementations of the paradigm were proposed in the last decades for both shared memory multi-core systems and clusters of distributed machines. However, chip manufacturers have started producing many-core architectures, with low network-on-chip communication latency and limited support for cache-coherence, rendering existing transactional memory implementations inapplicable. This paper presents TM2C, the first software Transactional Memory protocol for Many-Core systems. TM2C exploits network-on-chip communications to get granted accesses to shared data through efficient message passing. In particular, it allows visible read accesses and hence effective distributed contention management with eager conflict detection. We also propose FairCM, a companion contention manager that ensures starvation-freedom, which we believe is an important property in many-core systems, as well as an implementation of elastic transactions in these settings. Our evaluation on four benchmarks, i.e., a linked list and a hash table data structures as well as a bank and a MapReduce-like applications, indicates better scalability than locks and up to 20-fold speedup (relative to bare sequential code) when running 24 application cores. © 2012 ACM