Spectral anonymization of data

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2007.This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.Includes bibliographical references (p. 87-96).Data anonymization is the process of conditioning a dataset such that no sensitive information can be learned about any specific individual, but valid scientific analysis can nevertheless be performed on it. It is not sufficient to simply remove identifying information because the remaining data may be enough to infer the individual source of the record (a reidentification disclosure) or to otherwise learn sensitive information about a person (a predictive disclosure). The only known way to prevent these disclosures is to remove additional information from the dataset. Dozens of anonymization methods have been proposed over the past few decades; most work by perturbing or suppressing variable values. None have been successful at simultaneously providing perfect privacy protection and allowing perfectly accurate scientific analysis. This dissertation makes the new observation that the anonymizing operations do not need to be made in the original basis of the dataset. Operating in a different, judiciously chosen basis can improve privacy protection, analytic utility, and computational efficiency. I use the term 'spectral anonymization' to refer to anonymizing in a spectral basis, such as the basis provided by the data's eigenvectors. Additionally, I propose new measures of reidentification and prediction risk that are more generally applicable and more informative than existing measures. I also propose a measure of analytic utility that assesses the preservation of the multivariate probability distribution. Finally, I propose the demanding reference standard of nonparticipation in the study to define adequate privacy protection. I give three examples of spectral anonymization in practice. The first example improves basic cell swapping from a weak algorithm to one competitive with state of-the-art methods merely by a change of basis.(cont) The second example demonstrates avoiding the curse of dimensionality in microaggregation. The third describes a powerful algorithm that reduces computational disclosure risk to the same level as that of nonparticipants and preserves at least 4th order interactions in the multivariate distribution. No previously reported algorithm has achieved this combination of results.by Thomas Anton Lasko.Ph.D

Spectral Graph Forge: Graph Generation Targeting Modularity

Community structure is an important property that captures inhomogeneities common in large networks, and modularity is one of the most widely used metrics for such community structure. In this paper, we introduce a principled methodology, the Spectral Graph Forge, for generating random graphs that preserves community structure from a real network of interest, in terms of modularity. Our approach leverages the fact that the spectral structure of matrix representations of a graph encodes global information about community structure. The Spectral Graph Forge uses a low-rank approximation of the modularity matrix to generate synthetic graphs that match a target modularity within user-selectable degree of accuracy, while allowing other aspects of structure to vary. We show that the Spectral Graph Forge outperforms state-of-the-art techniques in terms of accuracy in targeting the modularity and randomness of the realizations, while also preserving other local structural properties and node attributes. We discuss extensions of the Spectral Graph Forge to target other properties beyond modularity, and its applications to anonymization

Using Metrics Suites to Improve the Measurement of Privacy in Graphs

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Social graphs are widely used in research (e.g., epidemiology) and business (e.g., recommender systems). However, sharing these graphs poses privacy risks because they contain sensitive information about individuals. Graph anonymization techniques aim to protect individual users in a graph, while graph de-anonymization aims to re-identify users. The effectiveness of anonymization and de-anonymization algorithms is usually evaluated with privacy metrics. However, it is unclear how strong existing privacy metrics are when they are used in graph privacy. In this paper, we study 26 privacy metrics for graph anonymization and de-anonymization and evaluate their strength in terms of three criteria: monotonicity indicates whether the metric indicates lower privacy for stronger adversaries; for within-scenario comparisons, evenness indicates whether metric values are spread evenly; and for between-scenario comparisons, shared value range indicates whether metrics use a consistent value range across scenarios. Our extensive experiments indicate that no single metric fulfills all three criteria perfectly. We therefore use methods from multi-criteria decision analysis to aggregate multiple metrics in a metrics suite, and we show that these metrics suites improve monotonicity compared to the best individual metric. This important result enables more monotonic, and thus more accurate, evaluations of new graph anonymization and de-anonymization algorithms