23,084 research outputs found
Local Approximation Schemes for Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks
We present two local approaches that yield polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS) for the Maximum Independent Set and Minimum Dominating Set problem in unit disk graphs. The algorithms run locally in each node and compute a (1+ε)-approximation to the problems at hand for any given ε > 0. The time complexity of both algorithms is O(TMIS + log*! n/εO(1)), where TMIS is the time required to compute a maximal independent set in the graph, and n denotes the number of nodes. We then extend these results to a more general class of graphs in which the maximum number of pair-wise independent nodes in every r-neighborhood is at most polynomial in r. Such graphs of polynomially bounded growth are introduced as a more realistic model for wireless networks and they generalize existing models, such as unit disk graphs or coverage area graphs
Towards a complexity theory for the congested clique
The congested clique model of distributed computing has been receiving
attention as a model for densely connected distributed systems. While there has
been significant progress on the side of upper bounds, we have very little in
terms of lower bounds for the congested clique; indeed, it is now know that
proving explicit congested clique lower bounds is as difficult as proving
circuit lower bounds.
In this work, we use various more traditional complexity-theoretic tools to
build a clearer picture of the complexity landscape of the congested clique:
-- Nondeterminism and beyond: We introduce the nondeterministic congested
clique model (analogous to NP) and show that there is a natural canonical
problem family that captures all problems solvable in constant time with
nondeterministic algorithms. We further generalise these notions by introducing
the constant-round decision hierarchy (analogous to the polynomial hierarchy).
-- Non-constructive lower bounds: We lift the prior non-uniform counting
arguments to a general technique for proving non-constructive uniform lower
bounds for the congested clique. In particular, we prove a time hierarchy
theorem for the congested clique, showing that there are decision problems of
essentially all complexities, both in the deterministic and nondeterministic
settings.
-- Fine-grained complexity: We map out relationships between various natural
problems in the congested clique model, arguing that a reduction-based
complexity theory currently gives us a fairly good picture of the complexity
landscape of the congested clique
Rainbow domination and related problems on some classes of perfect graphs
Let and let be a graph. A function is a rainbow function if, for every vertex with
, . The rainbow domination number
is the minimum of over all rainbow
functions. We investigate the rainbow domination problem for some classes of
perfect graphs
Fast exact algorithms for some connectivity problems parametrized by clique-width
Given a clique-width -expression of a graph , we provide time algorithms for connectivity constraints on locally checkable properties
such as Node-Weighted Steiner Tree, Connected Dominating Set, or Connected
Vertex Cover. We also propose a time algorithm for Feedback
Vertex Set. The best running times for all the considered cases were either
or worse
A Breezing Proof of the KMW Bound
In their seminal paper from 2004, Kuhn, Moscibroda, and Wattenhofer (KMW)
proved a hardness result for several fundamental graph problems in the LOCAL
model: For any (randomized) algorithm, there are input graphs with nodes
and maximum degree on which (expected) communication rounds are
required to obtain polylogarithmic approximations to a minimum vertex cover,
minimum dominating set, or maximum matching. Via reduction, this hardness
extends to symmetry breaking tasks like finding maximal independent sets or
maximal matchings. Today, more than years later, there is still no proof
of this result that is easy on the reader. Setting out to change this, in this
work, we provide a fully self-contained and proof of the KMW
lower bound. The key argument is algorithmic, and it relies on an invariant
that can be readily verified from the generation rules of the lower bound
graphs.Comment: 21 pages, 6 figure
GraphCombEx: A Software Tool for Exploration of Combinatorial Optimisation Properties of Large Graphs
We present a prototype of a software tool for exploration of multiple
combinatorial optimisation problems in large real-world and synthetic complex
networks. Our tool, called GraphCombEx (an acronym of Graph Combinatorial
Explorer), provides a unified framework for scalable computation and
presentation of high-quality suboptimal solutions and bounds for a number of
widely studied combinatorial optimisation problems. Efficient representation
and applicability to large-scale graphs and complex networks are particularly
considered in its design. The problems currently supported include maximum
clique, graph colouring, maximum independent set, minimum vertex clique
covering, minimum dominating set, as well as the longest simple cycle problem.
Suboptimal solutions and intervals for optimal objective values are estimated
using scalable heuristics. The tool is designed with extensibility in mind,
with the view of further problems and both new fast and high-performance
heuristics to be added in the future. GraphCombEx has already been successfully
used as a support tool in a number of recent research studies using
combinatorial optimisation to analyse complex networks, indicating its promise
as a research software tool
Adding Isolated Vertices Makes some Online Algorithms Optimal
An unexpected difference between online and offline algorithms is observed.
The natural greedy algorithms are shown to be worst case online optimal for
Online Independent Set and Online Vertex Cover on graphs with 'enough' isolated
vertices, Freckle Graphs. For Online Dominating Set, the greedy algorithm is
shown to be worst case online optimal on graphs with at least one isolated
vertex. These algorithms are not online optimal in general. The online
optimality results for these greedy algorithms imply optimality according to
various worst case performance measures, such as the competitive ratio. It is
also shown that, despite this worst case optimality, there are Freckle graphs
where the greedy independent set algorithm is objectively less good than
another algorithm. It is shown that it is NP-hard to determine any of the
following for a given graph: the online independence number, the online vertex
cover number, and the online domination number.Comment: A footnote in the .tex file didn't show up in the last version. This
was fixe
- …