4,062 research outputs found
The hardness of decoding linear codes with preprocessing
The problem of maximum-likelihood decoding of linear block codes is known to be hard. The fact that the problem remains hard even if the code is known in advance, and can be preprocessed for as long as desired in order to device a decoding algorithm, is shown. The hardness is based on the fact that existence of a polynomial-time algorithm implies that the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Thus, some linear block codes probably do not have an efficient decoder. The proof is based on results in complexity theory that relate uniform and nonuniform complexity classes
P-Selectivity, Immunity, and the Power of One Bit
We prove that P-sel, the class of all P-selective sets, is EXP-immune, but is
not EXP/1-immune. That is, we prove that some infinite P-selective set has no
infinite EXP-time subset, but we also prove that every infinite P-selective set
has some infinite subset in EXP/1. Informally put, the immunity of P-sel is so
fragile that it is pierced by a single bit of information.
The above claims follow from broader results that we obtain about the
immunity of the P-selective sets. In particular, we prove that for every
recursive function f, P-sel is DTIME(f)-immune. Yet we also prove that P-sel is
not \Pi_2^p/1-immune
Channel Capacity under General Nonuniform Sampling
This paper develops the fundamental capacity limits of a sampled analog
channel under a sub-Nyquist sampling rate constraint. In particular, we derive
the capacity of sampled analog channels over a general class of time-preserving
sampling methods including irregular nonuniform sampling. Our results indicate
that the optimal sampling structures extract out the set of frequencies that
exhibits the highest SNR among all spectral sets of support size equal to the
sampling rate. The capacity under sub-Nyquist sampling can be attained through
filter-bank sampling, or through a single branch of modulation and filtering
followed by uniform sampling. The capacity under sub-Nyquist sampling is a
monotone function of the sampling rate. These results indicate that the optimal
sampling schemes suppress aliasing, and that employing irregular nonuniform
sampling does not provide capacity gain over uniform sampling sets with
appropriate preprocessing for a large class of channels.Comment: 5 pages, to appear in IEEE International Symposium on Information
Theory (ISIT), 201
A Casual Tour Around a Circuit Complexity Bound
I will discuss the recent proof that the complexity class NEXP
(nondeterministic exponential time) lacks nonuniform ACC circuits of polynomial
size. The proof will be described from the perspective of someone trying to
discover it.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figures. An earlier version appeared in SIGACT News,
September 201
Proof Complexity of Systems of (Non-Deterministic) Decision Trees and Branching Programs
This paper studies propositional proof systems in which lines are sequents of decision trees or branching programs, deterministic or non-deterministic. Decision trees (DTs) are represented by a natural term syntax, inducing the system LDT, and non-determinism is modelled by including disjunction, ?, as primitive (system LNDT). Branching programs generalise DTs to dag-like structures and are duly handled by extension variables in our setting, as is common in proof complexity (systems eLDT and eLNDT).
Deterministic and non-deterministic branching programs are natural nonuniform analogues of log-space (L) and nondeterministic log-space (NL), respectively. Thus eLDT and eLNDT serve as natural systems of reasoning corresponding to L and NL, respectively.
The main results of the paper are simulation and non-simulation results for tree-like and dag-like proofs in LDT, LNDT, eLDT and eLNDT. We also compare them with Frege systems, constant-depth Frege systems and extended Frege systems
Interpolation in Valiant's theory
We investigate the following question: if a polynomial can be evaluated at
rational points by a polynomial-time boolean algorithm, does it have a
polynomial-size arithmetic circuit? We argue that this question is certainly
difficult. Answering it negatively would indeed imply that the constant-free
versions of the algebraic complexity classes VP and VNP defined by Valiant are
different. Answering this question positively would imply a transfer theorem
from boolean to algebraic complexity. Our proof method relies on Lagrange
interpolation and on recent results connecting the (boolean) counting hierarchy
to algebraic complexity classes. As a byproduct we obtain two additional
results: (i) The constant-free, degree-unbounded version of Valiant's
hypothesis that VP and VNP differ implies the degree-bounded version. This
result was previously known to hold for fields of positive characteristic only.
(ii) If exponential sums of easy to compute polynomials can be computed
efficiently, then the same is true of exponential products. We point out an
application of this result to the P=NP problem in the Blum-Shub-Smale model of
computation over the field of complex numbers.Comment: 13 page
- …