Quality Analysis of Software Applications using Software Reliability Growth Models and Deep Learning Models

Finding the faults in the software is a very tedious task. Many software companies are trying to develop high-quality software which is having no faults. It is very important to analyze the errors, faults, and bugs in software development. Software reliability growth models (SRGM's) are used to help the software industries to create quality software products. Quality is the software metric that is used to analyze the performance of the software product. The software product which is having no errors or faults is considered the best software product. SRGM is also utilized to analyze the software quality based on the programming language. Deep Learning (DL) is a sub-domain in machine learning to solve several complex issues in software development. Finding accurate patterns from software faults is a very tedious task. DL algorithm performs better in integrating the SRGM with the DL approaches giving better results based on software fault detection. Many software faults real-time datasets are available to analyze the DL approaches. The performances of the various integrated models are analyzed by showing the quality metrics

Deep Learning Predictive Models for Terminal Call Rate Prediction during the Warranty Period

Background: This paper addresses the problem of products’ terminal call rate (TCR) prediction during the warranty period. TCR refers to the information on the amount of funds to be reserved for product repairs during the warranty period. So far, various methods have been used to address this problem, from discrete event simulation and time series, to machine learning predictive models. Objectives: In this paper, we address the above named problem by applying deep learning models to predict terminal call rate. Methods/Approach: We have developed a series of deep learning models on a data set obtained from a manufacturer of home appliances, and we have analysed their quality and performance. Results: Results showed that a deep neural network with 6 layers and a convolutional neural network gave the best results. Conclusions: This paper suggests that deep learning is an approach worth exploring further, however, with the disadvantage being that it requires large volumes of quality data

Analyze the Performance of Software by Machine Learning Methods for Fault Prediction Techniques

Trend of using the software in daily life is increasing day by day. Software system development is growing more difficult as these technologies are integrated into daily life. Therefore, creating highly effective software is a significant difficulty. The quality of any software system continues to be the most important element among all the required characteristics. Nearly one-third of the total cost of software development goes toward testing. Therefore, it is always advantageous to find a software bug early in the software development process because if it is not found early, it will drive up the cost of the software development. This type of issue is intended to be resolved via software fault prediction. There is always a need for a better and enhanced prediction model in order to forecast the fault before the real testing and so reduce the flaws in the time and expense of software projects. The various machine learning techniques for classifying software bugs are discussed in this paper

Deep Learning for Software Defect Prediction: An LSTM-based Approach

Software defect prediction is an important aspect of software development, as it helps developers and organizations to identify and resolve bugs in the software before they become major issues. In this paper, we explore the use of machine learning algorithms for software defect prediction. We discuss the different types of machine learning algorithms that have been used for software defect prediction and their advantages and disadvantages. We also provide a comprehensive review of recent studies that have used machine learning algorithms for software defect prediction. The paper concludes with a discussion of the challenges and opportunities in using machine learning algorithms for software defect prediction and the future directions of research in this field. This paper surveys the existing literature on software defect prediction, focusing specifically on deep learning techniques. Compared to existing surveys on the topic, this paper offers a more in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of deep learning approaches for software defect prediction. It explores the use of LSTMs for this task, which have not been extensively studied in previous surveys. Additionally, this paper provides a comprehensive review of recent research in the field, highlighting the most promising deep learning models and techniques for software defect prediction. The results of this survey demonstrate that LSTM-based deep learning models can outperform traditional machine learning approaches and achieve state-of-the-art results in software defect prediction. Furthermore, this paper provides insights into the challenges and limitations of deep learning approaches for software defect prediction, highlighting areas for future research and improvement. Overall, this paper offers a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in using deep learning techniques for software defect prediction.

Automatic repair and type binding of undeclared variables using neural networks

Over the past few years, there had been significant achievements in the deployment of deep learning for analysing the programs due to the brilliance of encoding the programs by building vector representations. Deep learning had been used in program analysis for detection of security vulnerabilities using generative adversarial networks, prediction of hidden software defects using software defect datasets. Furthermore, they had also been used for detecting as well as fixing syntax errors that are made by novice programmers by learning a trained neural machine translation on bug-free programming source codes to suggest possible fixes by finding the location of the tokens that are not in place. However, all these approaches either require defect datasets or bug-free code samples that are executable for training the deep learning model. Our neural network model is neither trained with any defect datasets nor bug-free code samples, instead it is trained using structural semantic details of ASTs where each node represents a construct appearing in the source code. This model is implemented to fix one of the most common syntax errors, such as undeclared variable errors as well as infer their type information before program compilation. By this approach, the model has achieved in correctly locating and identifying 81% of the programs on prutor dataset of 1059 programs with undeclared variable errors and also inferring their data types correctly in 80% of the programs