40,167 research outputs found
How are topics born? Understanding the research dynamics preceding the emergence of new areas
The ability to promptly recognise new research trends is strategic for many stake- holders, including universities, institutional funding bodies, academic publishers and companies. While the literature describes several approaches which aim to identify the emergence of new research topics early in their lifecycle, these rely on the assumption that the topic in question is already associated with a number of publications and consistently referred to by a community of researchers. Hence, detecting the emergence of a new research area at an embryonic stage, i.e., before the topic has been consistently labelled by a community of researchers and associated with a number of publications, is still an open challenge. In this paper, we begin to address this challenge by performing a study of the dynamics preceding the creation of new topics. This study indicates that the emergence of a new topic is anticipated by a significant increase in the pace of collaboration between relevant research areas, which can be seen as the ‘parents’ of the new topic. These initial findings (i) confirm our hypothesis that it is possible in principle to detect the emergence of a new topic at the embryonic stage, (ii) provide new empirical evidence supporting relevant theories in Philosophy of Science, and also (iii) suggest that new topics tend to emerge in an environment in which weakly interconnected research areas begin to cross-fertilise
Exploring scholarly data with Rexplore.
Despite the large number and variety of tools and services available today for exploring scholarly data, current support is still very limited in the context of sensemaking tasks, which go beyond standard search and ranking of authors and publications, and focus instead on i) understanding the dynamics of research areas, ii) relating authors ‘semantically’ (e.g., in terms of common interests or shared academic trajectories), or iii) performing fine-grained academic expert search along multiple dimensions. To address this gap we have developed a novel tool, Rexplore, which integrates statistical analysis, semantic technologies, and visual analytics to provide effective support for exploring and making sense of scholarly data. Here, we describe the main innovative elements of the tool and we present the results from a task-centric empirical evaluation, which shows that Rexplore is highly effective at providing support for the aforementioned sensemaking tasks. In addition, these results are robust both with respect to the background of the users (i.e., expert analysts vs. ‘ordinary’ users) and also with respect to whether the tasks are selected by the evaluators or proposed by the users themselves
Interests Diffusion in Social Networks
Understanding cultural phenomena on Social Networks (SNs) and exploiting the
implicit knowledge about their members is attracting the interest of different
research communities both from the academic and the business side. The
community of complexity science is devoting significant efforts to define laws,
models, and theories, which, based on acquired knowledge, are able to predict
future observations (e.g. success of a product). In the mean time, the semantic
web community aims at engineering a new generation of advanced services by
defining constructs, models and methods, adding a semantic layer to SNs. In
this context, a leapfrog is expected to come from a hybrid approach merging the
disciplines above. Along this line, this work focuses on the propagation of
individual interests in social networks. The proposed framework consists of the
following main components: a method to gather information about the members of
the social networks; methods to perform some semantic analysis of the Domain of
Interest; a procedure to infer members' interests; and an interests evolution
theory to predict how the interests propagate in the network. As a result, one
achieves an analytic tool to measure individual features, such as members'
susceptibilities and authorities. Although the approach applies to any type of
social network, here it is has been tested against the computer science
research community.
The DBLP (Digital Bibliography and Library Project) database has been elected
as test-case since it provides the most comprehensive list of scientific
production in this field.Comment: 30 pages 13 figs 4 table
Understanding research dynamics
Rexplore leverages novel solutions in data mining, semantic technologies and visual analytics, and provides an innovative environment for exploring and making sense of scholarly data. Rexplore allows users: 1) to detect and make sense of important trends in research; 2) to identify a variety of interesting relations between researchers, beyond the standard co-authorship relations provided by most other systems; 3) to perform fine-grained expert search with respect to detailed multi-dimensional parameters; 4) to detect and characterize the dynamics of interesting communities of researchers, identified on the basis of shared research interests and scientific trajectories; 5) to analyse research performance at different levels of abstraction, including individual researchers, organizations, countries, and research communities
- …