457 research outputs found
Single Parameter Combinatorial Auctions with Partially Public Valuations
We consider the problem of designing truthful auctions, when the bidders'
valuations have a public and a private component. In particular, we consider
combinatorial auctions where the valuation of an agent for a set of
items can be expressed as , where is a private single parameter
of the agent, and the function is publicly known. Our motivation behind
studying this problem is two-fold: (a) Such valuation functions arise naturally
in the case of ad-slots in broadcast media such as Television and Radio. For an
ad shown in a set of ad-slots, is, say, the number of {\em unique}
viewers reached by the ad, and is the valuation per-unique-viewer. (b)
From a theoretical point of view, this factorization of the valuation function
simplifies the bidding language, and renders the combinatorial auction more
amenable to better approximation factors. We present a general technique, based
on maximal-in-range mechanisms, that converts any -approximation
non-truthful algorithm () for this problem into
and -approximate truthful
mechanisms which run in polynomial time and quasi-polynomial time,
respectively
Constrained Signaling in Auction Design
We consider the problem of an auctioneer who faces the task of selling a good
(drawn from a known distribution) to a set of buyers, when the auctioneer does
not have the capacity to describe to the buyers the exact identity of the good
that he is selling. Instead, he must come up with a constrained signalling
scheme: a (non injective) mapping from goods to signals, that satisfies the
constraints of his setting. For example, the auctioneer may be able to
communicate only a bounded length message for each good, or he might be legally
constrained in how he can advertise the item being sold. Each candidate
signaling scheme induces an incomplete-information game among the buyers, and
the goal of the auctioneer is to choose the signaling scheme and accompanying
auction format that optimizes welfare. In this paper, we use techniques from
submodular function maximization and no-regret learning to give algorithms for
computing constrained signaling schemes for a variety of constrained signaling
problems
Public projects, Boolean functions and the borders of Border's theorem
Border's theorem gives an intuitive linear characterization of the feasible
interim allocation rules of a Bayesian single-item environment, and it has
several applications in economic and algorithmic mechanism design. All known
generalizations of Border's theorem either restrict attention to relatively
simple settings, or resort to approximation. This paper identifies a
complexity-theoretic barrier that indicates, assuming standard complexity class
separations, that Border's theorem cannot be extended significantly beyond the
state-of-the-art. We also identify a surprisingly tight connection between
Myerson's optimal auction theory, when applied to public project settings, and
some fundamental results in the analysis of Boolean functions.Comment: Accepted to ACM EC 201
Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions
When attempting to design a truthful mechanism for a computationally hard problem such as combinatorial auctions, one is faced with the problem that most efficiently computable heuristics can not be embedded in any truthful mechanism (e.g. VCG-like payment rules will not ensure truthfulness).
We develop a set of techniques that allow constructing efficiently computable truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions in the special case where each bidder desires a specific known subset of items and only the valuation is unknown by the mechanism (the single parameter case). For this case we extend the work of Lehmann, O'Callaghan, and Shoham, who presented greedy heuristics. We show how to use If-Then-Else constructs, perform a partial search, and use the LP relaxation. We apply these techniques for several canonical types of combinatorial auctions, obtaining truthful mechanisms with provable approximation ratios
05011 Abstracts Collection -- Computing and Markets
From 03.01.05 to 07.01.05, the
Dagstuhl Seminar 05011``Computing and Markets\u27\u27 was held
in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI),
Schloss Dagstuhl.
During the seminar, several participants presented their current
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of
the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of
seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section
describes the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available
Composable and Efficient Mechanisms
We initiate the study of efficient mechanism design with guaranteed good
properties even when players participate in multiple different mechanisms
simultaneously or sequentially. We define the class of smooth mechanisms,
related to smooth games defined by Roughgarden, that can be thought of as
mechanisms that generate approximately market clearing prices. We show that
smooth mechanisms result in high quality outcome in equilibrium both in the
full information setting and in the Bayesian setting with uncertainty about
participants, as well as in learning outcomes. Our main result is to show that
such mechanisms compose well: smoothness locally at each mechanism implies
efficiency globally.
For mechanisms where good performance requires that bidders do not bid above
their value, we identify the notion of a weakly smooth mechanism. Weakly smooth
mechanisms, such as the Vickrey auction, are approximately efficient under the
no-overbidding assumption. Similar to smooth mechanisms, weakly smooth
mechanisms behave well in composition, and have high quality outcome in
equilibrium (assuming no overbidding) both in the full information setting and
in the Bayesian setting, as well as in learning outcomes.
In most of the paper we assume participants have quasi-linear valuations. We
also extend some of our results to settings where participants have budget
constraints
Complexity Theory, Game Theory, and Economics: The Barbados Lectures
This document collects the lecture notes from my mini-course "Complexity
Theory, Game Theory, and Economics," taught at the Bellairs Research Institute
of McGill University, Holetown, Barbados, February 19--23, 2017, as the 29th
McGill Invitational Workshop on Computational Complexity.
The goal of this mini-course is twofold: (i) to explain how complexity theory
has helped illuminate several barriers in economics and game theory; and (ii)
to illustrate how game-theoretic questions have led to new and interesting
complexity theory, including recent several breakthroughs. It consists of two
five-lecture sequences: the Solar Lectures, focusing on the communication and
computational complexity of computing equilibria; and the Lunar Lectures,
focusing on applications of complexity theory in game theory and economics. No
background in game theory is assumed.Comment: Revised v2 from December 2019 corrects some errors in and adds some
recent citations to v1 Revised v3 corrects a few typos in v
Characterizing Optimal Adword Auctions
We present a number of models for the adword auctions used for pricing
advertising slots on search engines such as Google, Yahoo! etc. We begin with a
general problem formulation which allows the privately known valuation per
click to be a function of both the identity of the advertiser and the slot. We
present a compact characterization of the set of all deterministic incentive
compatible direct mechanisms for this model. This new characterization allows
us to conclude that there are incentive compatible mechanisms for this auction
with a multi-dimensional type-space that are {\em not} affine maximizers. Next,
we discuss two interesting special cases: slot independent valuation and slot
independent valuation up to a privately known slot and zero thereafter. For
both of these special cases, we characterize revenue maximizing and efficiency
maximizing mechanisms and show that these mechanisms can be computed with a
worst case computational complexity and respectively,
where is number of bidders and is number of slots. Next, we
characterize optimal rank based allocation rules and propose a new mechanism
that we call the customized rank based allocation. We report the results of a
numerical study that compare the revenue and efficiency of the proposed
mechanisms. The numerical results suggest that customized rank-based allocation
rule is significantly superior to the rank-based allocation rules.Comment: 29 pages, work was presented at a) Second Workshop on Sponsored
Search Auctions, Ann Arbor, MI b) INFORMS Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh c)
Decision Sciences Seminar, Fuqua School of Business, Duke Universit
- …