4,041 research outputs found
A Meta-Logic of Inference Rules: Syntax
This work was intended to be an attempt to introduce the meta-language for
working with multiple-conclusion inference rules that admit asserted
propositions along with the rejected propositions. The presence of rejected
propositions, and especially the presence of the rule of reverse substitution,
requires certain change the definition of structurality
Integrating a Global Induction Mechanism into a Sequent Calculus
Most interesting proofs in mathematics contain an inductive argument which
requires an extension of the LK-calculus to formalize. The most commonly used
calculi for induction contain a separate rule or axiom which reduces the valid
proof theoretic properties of the calculus. To the best of our knowledge, there
are no such calculi which allow cut-elimination to a normal form with the
subformula property, i.e. every formula occurring in the proof is a subformula
of the end sequent. Proof schemata are a variant of LK-proofs able to simulate
induction by linking proofs together. There exists a schematic normal form
which has comparable proof theoretic behaviour to normal forms with the
subformula property. However, a calculus for the construction of proof schemata
does not exist. In this paper, we introduce a calculus for proof schemata and
prove soundness and completeness with respect to a fragment of the inductive
arguments formalizable in Peano arithmetic.Comment: 16 page
Correspondences between Classical, Intuitionistic and Uniform Provability
Based on an analysis of the inference rules used, we provide a
characterization of the situations in which classical provability entails
intuitionistic provability. We then examine the relationship of these
derivability notions to uniform provability, a restriction of intuitionistic
provability that embodies a special form of goal-directedness. We determine,
first, the circumstances in which the former relations imply the latter. Using
this result, we identify the richest versions of the so-called abstract logic
programming languages in classical and intuitionistic logic. We then study the
reduction of classical and, derivatively, intuitionistic provability to uniform
provability via the addition to the assumption set of the negation of the
formula to be proved. Our focus here is on understanding the situations in
which this reduction is achieved. However, our discussions indicate the
structure of a proof procedure based on the reduction, a matter also considered
explicitly elsewhere.Comment: 31 page
Uniform Substitution for Differential Game Logic
This paper presents a uniform substitution calculus for differential game
logic (dGL). Church's uniform substitutions substitute a term or formula for a
function or predicate symbol everywhere. After generalizing them to
differential game logic and allowing for the substitution of hybrid games for
game symbols, uniform substitutions make it possible to only use axioms instead
of axiom schemata, thereby substantially simplifying implementations. Instead
of subtle schema variables and soundness-critical side conditions on the
occurrence patterns of logical variables to restrict infinitely many axiom
schema instances to sound ones, the resulting axiomatization adopts only a
finite number of ordinary dGL formulas as axioms, which uniform substitutions
instantiate soundly. This paper proves soundness and completeness of uniform
substitutions for the monotone modal logic dGL. The resulting axiomatization
admits a straightforward modular implementation of dGL in theorem provers
- …