12,586 research outputs found
Why it is important to build robots capable of doing science
Science, like any other cognitive activity, is grounded in the sensorimotor interaction of our bodies with the environment. Human embodiment thus constrains the class of scientific concepts and theories which are accessible to us. The paper explores the possibility of doing science with artificial cognitive agents, in the framework of an interactivist-constructivist cognitive model of science. Intelligent robots, by virtue of having different sensorimotor capabilities, may overcome the fundamental limitations of human science and provide important technological innovations. Mathematics and nanophysics are prime candidates for being studied by artificial scientists
A Hierarchical Emotion Regulated Sensorimotor Model: Case Studies
Inspired by the hierarchical cognitive architecture and the perception-action
model (PAM), we propose that the internal status acts as a kind of
common-coding representation which affects, mediates and even regulates the
sensorimotor behaviours. These regulation can be depicted in the Bayesian
framework, that is why cognitive agents are able to generate behaviours with
subtle differences according to their emotion or recognize the emotion by
perception. A novel recurrent neural network called recurrent neural network
with parametric bias units (RNNPB) runs in three modes, constructing a
two-level emotion regulated learning model, was further applied to testify this
theory in two different cases.Comment: Accepted at The 5th International Conference on Data-Driven Control
and Learning Systems. 201
Enaction-Based Artificial Intelligence: Toward Coevolution with Humans in the Loop
This article deals with the links between the enaction paradigm and
artificial intelligence. Enaction is considered a metaphor for artificial
intelligence, as a number of the notions which it deals with are deemed
incompatible with the phenomenal field of the virtual. After explaining this
stance, we shall review previous works regarding this issue in terms of
artifical life and robotics. We shall focus on the lack of recognition of
co-evolution at the heart of these approaches. We propose to explicitly
integrate the evolution of the environment into our approach in order to refine
the ontogenesis of the artificial system, and to compare it with the enaction
paradigm. The growing complexity of the ontogenetic mechanisms to be activated
can therefore be compensated by an interactive guidance system emanating from
the environment. This proposition does not however resolve that of the
relevance of the meaning created by the machine (sense-making). Such
reflections lead us to integrate human interaction into this environment in
order to construct relevant meaning in terms of participative artificial
intelligence. This raises a number of questions with regards to setting up an
enactive interaction. The article concludes by exploring a number of issues,
thereby enabling us to associate current approaches with the principles of
morphogenesis, guidance, the phenomenology of interactions and the use of
minimal enactive interfaces in setting up experiments which will deal with the
problem of artificial intelligence in a variety of enaction-based ways
Beyond Gazing, Pointing, and Reaching: A Survey of Developmental Robotics
Developmental robotics is an emerging field located
at the intersection of developmental psychology
and robotics, that has lately attracted
quite some attention. This paper gives a survey of
a variety of research projects dealing with or inspired
by developmental issues, and outlines possible
future directions
Robot pain: a speculative review of its functions
Given the scarce bibliography dealing explicitly with robot pain, this chapter has enriched its review with related research works about robot behaviours and capacities in which pain could play a role. It is shown that all such roles Âżranging from punishment to intrinsic motivation and planning knowledgeÂż can be formulated within the unified framework of reinforcement learning.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
- âŠ