Tweakable Blockciphers for Efficient Authenticated Encryptions with Beyond the Birthday-Bound Security

Modular design via a tweakable blockcipher (TBC) offers efficient authenticated encryption (AE) schemes (with associated data) that call a blockcipher once for each data block (of associated data or a plaintext). However, the existing efficient blockcipher-based TBCs are secure up to the birthday bound, where the underlying keyed blockcipher is a secure strong pseudorandom permutation. Existing blockcipher-based AE schemes with beyond-birthday-bound (BBB) security are not efficient, that is, a blockcipher is called twice or more for each data block. In this paper, we present a TBC, XKX, that offers efficient blockcipher-based AE schemes with BBB security, by combining with efficient TBC-based AE schemes such as ΘCB3 an

ISAP – Towards Side-Channel Secure Authenticated Encryption

Side-channel attacks and in particular differential power analysis (DPA) attacks pose a serious threat to cryptographic implementations. One approach to counteract such attacks are cryptographic schemes based on fresh re-keying. In settings of pre-shared secret keys, such schemes render DPA attacks infeasible by deriving session keys and by ensuring that the attacker cannot collect side-channel leakage on the session key during cryptographic operations with different inputs. While these schemes can be applied to secure standard communication settings, current re-keying approaches are unable to provide protection in settings where the same input needs to be processed multiple times. In this work, we therefore adapt the re-keying approach and present a symmetric authenticated encryption scheme that is secure against DPA attacks and that does not have such a usage restriction. This means that our scheme fully complies with the requirements given in the CAESAR call and hence, can be used like other noncebased authenticated encryption schemes without loss of side-channel protection. Its resistance against side-channel analysis is highly relevant for several applications in practice, like bulk storage settings in general and the protection of FPGA bitfiles and firmware images in particular

Simpira v2: A Family of Efficient Permutations Using the AES Round Function

International audienceThis paper introduces Simpira, a family of cryptographic permutations that supports inputs of 128*b bits, where b is a positive integer. Its design goal is to achieve high throughput on virtually all modern 64-bit processors, that nowadays already have native instructions for AES. To achieve this goal, Simpira uses only one building block: the AES round function. For b=1, Simpira corresponds to 12-round AES with fixed round keys, whereas for b>=2, Simpira is a Generalized Feistel Structure (GFS) with an F-function that consists of two rounds of AES. We claim that there are no structural distinguishers for Simpira with a complexity below 2^128, and analyze its security against a variety of attacks in this setting. The throughput of Simpira is close to the theoretical optimum, namely, the number of AES rounds in the construction. For example, on the Intel Skylake processor, Simpira has throughput below 1 cycle per byte for b≤4 and b=6. For larger permutations, where moving data in memory has a more pronounced effect, Simpira with b=32 (512 byte inputs) evaluates 732 AES rounds, and performs at 824 cycles (1.61 cycles per byte), which is less than 13% off the theoretical optimum. If the data is stored in interleaved buffers, this overhead is reduced to less than 1%. The Simpira family offers an efficient solution when processing wide blocks, larger than 128 bits, is desired

Improved Masking for Tweakable Blockciphers with Applications to Authenticated Encryption

A popular approach to tweakable blockcipher design is via masking, where a certain primitive (a blockcipher or a permutation) is preceded and followed by an easy-to-compute tweak-dependent mask. In this work, we revisit the principle of masking. We do so alongside the introduction of the tweakable Even-Mansour construction MEM. Its masking function combines the advantages of word-oriented LFSR- and powering-up-based methods. We show in particular how recent advancements in computing discrete logarithms over finite fields of characteristic 2 can be exploited in a constructive way to realize highly efficient, constant-time masking functions. If the masking satisfies a set of simple conditions, then MEM is a secure tweakable blockcipher up to the birthday bound. The strengths of MEM are exhibited by the design of fully parallelizable authenticated encryption schemes OPP (nonce-respecting) and MRO (misuse-resistant). If instantiated with a reduced-round BLAKE2b permutation, OPP and MRO achieve speeds up to 0.55 and 1.06 cycles per byte on the Intel Haswell microarchitecture, and are able to significantly outperform their closest competitors

Security of Keyed Sponge Constructions Using a Modular Proof Approach

© International Association for Cryptologic Research 2015. Sponge functions were originally proposed for hashing, but find increasingly more applications in keyed constructions, such as encryption and authentication. Depending on how the key is used we see two main types of keyed sponges in practice: inner- and outerkeyed. Earlier security bounds, mostly due to the well-known sponge indifferentiability result, guarantee a security level of c/2 bits with c the capacity. We reconsider these two keyed sponge versions and derive improved bounds in the classical indistinguishability setting as well as in an extended setting where the adversary targets multiple instances at the same time. For cryptographically significant parameter values, the expected workload for an attacker to be successful in an n-target attack against the outer-keyed sponge is the minimum over 2k/n and 2c/μ with k the key length and μ the total maximum multiplicity. For the innerkeyed sponge this simplifies to 2k/μ with maximum security if k = c. The multiplicity is a characteristic of the data available to the attacker. It is at most twice the data complexity, but will be much smaller in practically relevant attack scenarios. We take a modular proof approach, and our indistinguishability bounds are the sum of a bound in the PRP model and a bound on the PRP-security of Even-Mansour type block ciphers in the ideal permutation model, where we obtain the latter result by using Patarin’s H-coefficient technique.status: publishe

Analysis and Design of Symmetric Cryptographic Algorithms

This doctoral thesis is dedicated to the analysis and the design of symmetric cryptographic algorithms. In the first part of the dissertation, we deal with fault-based attacks on cryptographic circuits which belong to the field of active implementation attacks and aim to retrieve secret keys stored on such chips. Our main focus lies on the cryptanalytic aspects of those attacks. In particular, we target block ciphers with a lightweight and (often) non-bijective key schedule where the derived subkeys are (almost) independent from each other. An attacker who is able to reconstruct one of the subkeys is thus not necessarily able to directly retrieve other subkeys or even the secret master key by simply reversing the key schedule. We introduce a framework based on differential fault analysis that allows to attack block ciphers with an arbitrary number of independent subkeys and which rely on a substitution-permutation network. These methods are then applied to the lightweight block ciphers LED and PRINCE and we show in both cases how to recover the secret master key requiring only a small number of fault injections. Moreover, we investigate approaches that utilize algebraic instead of differential techniques for the fault analysis and discuss advantages and drawbacks. At the end of the first part of the dissertation, we explore fault-based attacks on the block cipher Bel-T which also has a lightweight key schedule but is not based on a substitution-permutation network but instead on the so-called Lai-Massey scheme. The framework mentioned above is thus not usable against Bel-T. Nevertheless, we also present techniques for the case of Bel-T that enable full recovery of the secret key in a very efficient way using differential fault analysis. In the second part of the thesis, we focus on authenticated encryption schemes. While regular ciphers only protect privacy of processed data, authenticated encryption schemes also secure its authenticity and integrity. Many of these ciphers are additionally able to protect authenticity and integrity of so-called associated data. This type of data is transmitted unencrypted but nevertheless must be protected from being tampered with during transmission. Authenticated encryption is nowadays the standard technique to protect in-transit data. However, most of the currently deployed schemes have deficits and there are many leverage points for improvements. With NORX we introduce a novel authenticated encryption scheme supporting associated data. This algorithm was designed with high security, efficiency in both hardware and software, simplicity, and robustness against side-channel attacks in mind. Next to its specification, we present special features, security goals, implementation details, extensive performance measurements and discuss advantages over currently deployed standards. Finally, we describe our preliminary security analysis where we investigate differential and rotational properties of NORX. Noteworthy are in particular the newly developed techniques for differential cryptanalysis of NORX which exploit the power of SAT- and SMT-solvers and have the potential to be easily adaptable to other encryption schemes as well.Diese Doktorarbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Analyse und dem Entwurf von symmetrischen kryptographischen Algorithmen. Im ersten Teil der Dissertation befassen wir uns mit fehlerbasierten Angriffen auf kryptographische Schaltungen, welche dem Gebiet der aktiven Seitenkanalangriffe zugeordnet werden und auf die Rekonstruktion geheimer Schlüssel abzielen, die auf diesen Chips gespeichert sind. Unser Hauptaugenmerk liegt dabei auf den kryptoanalytischen Aspekten dieser Angriffe. Insbesondere beschäftigen wir uns dabei mit Blockchiffren, die leichtgewichtige und eine (oft) nicht-bijektive Schlüsselexpansion besitzen, bei denen die erzeugten Teilschlüssel voneinander (nahezu) unabhängig sind. Ein Angreifer, dem es gelingt einen Teilschlüssel zu rekonstruieren, ist dadurch nicht in der Lage direkt weitere Teilschlüssel oder sogar den Hauptschlüssel abzuleiten indem er einfach die Schlüsselexpansion umkehrt. Wir stellen Techniken basierend auf differenzieller Fehleranalyse vor, die es ermöglichen Blockchiffren zu analysieren, welche eine beliebige Anzahl unabhängiger Teilschlüssel einsetzen und auf Substitutions-Permutations Netzwerken basieren. Diese Methoden werden im Anschluss auf die leichtgewichtigen Blockchiffren LED und PRINCE angewandt und wir zeigen in beiden Fällen wie der komplette geheime Schlüssel mit einigen wenigen Fehlerinjektionen rekonstruiert werden kann. Darüber hinaus untersuchen wir Methoden, die algebraische statt differenzielle Techniken der Fehleranalyse einsetzen und diskutieren deren Vor- und Nachteile. Am Ende des ersten Teils der Dissertation befassen wir uns mit fehlerbasierten Angriffen auf die Blockchiffre Bel-T, welche ebenfalls eine leichtgewichtige Schlüsselexpansion besitzt jedoch nicht auf einem Substitutions-Permutations Netzwerk sondern auf dem sogenannten Lai-Massey Schema basiert. Die oben genannten Techniken können daher bei Bel-T nicht angewandt werden. Nichtsdestotrotz werden wir auch für den Fall von Bel-T Verfahren vorstellen, die in der Lage sind den vollständigen geheimen Schlüssel sehr effizient mit Hilfe von differenzieller Fehleranalyse zu rekonstruieren. Im zweiten Teil der Doktorarbeit beschäftigen wir uns mit authentifizierenden Verschlüsselungsverfahren. Während gewöhnliche Chiffren nur die Vertraulichkeit der verarbeiteten Daten sicherstellen, gewährleisten authentifizierende Verschlüsselungsverfahren auch deren Authentizität und Integrität. Viele dieser Chiffren sind darüber hinaus in der Lage auch die Authentizität und Integrität von sogenannten assoziierten Daten zu gewährleisten. Daten dieses Typs werden in nicht-verschlüsselter Form übertragen, müssen aber dennoch gegen unbefugte Veränderungen auf dem Transportweg geschützt sein. Authentifizierende Verschlüsselungsverfahren bilden heutzutage die Standardtechnologie um Daten während der Übertragung zu beschützen. Aktuell eingesetzte Verfahren weisen jedoch oftmals Defizite auf und es existieren vielfältige Ansatzpunkte für Verbesserungen. Mit NORX stellen wir ein neuartiges authentifizierendes Verschlüsselungsverfahren vor, welches assoziierte Daten unterstützt. Dieser Algorithmus wurde vor allem im Hinblick auf Einsatzgebiete mit hohen Sicherheitsanforderungen, Effizienz in Hardware und Software, Einfachheit, und Robustheit gegenüber Seitenkanalangriffen entwickelt. Neben der Spezifikation präsentieren wir besondere Eigenschaften, angestrebte Sicherheitsziele, Details zur Implementierung, umfassende Performanz-Messungen und diskutieren Vorteile gegenüber aktuellen Standards. Schließlich stellen wir Ergebnisse unserer vorläufigen Sicherheitsanalyse vor, bei der wir uns vor allem auf differenzielle Merkmale und Rotationseigenschaften von NORX konzentrieren. Erwähnenswert sind dabei vor allem die für die differenzielle Kryptoanalyse von NORX entwickelten Techniken, die auf die Effizienz von SAT- und SMT-Solvern zurückgreifen und das Potential besitzen relativ einfach auch auf andere Verschlüsselungsverfahren übertragen werden zu können

Provably Secure Authenticated Encryption

Authenticated Encryption (AE) is a symmetric key cryptographic primitive that ensures confidentiality and authenticity of processed messages at the same time. The research of AE as a primitive in its own right started in 2000. The security goals of AE were captured in formal definitions in the tradition in the tradition of provable security (such as NAE, MRAE, OAE, RAE or the RUP), where the security of a scheme is formally proven assuming the security of an underlying building block. The prevailing syntax moved to nonce-based AE with associated data (which is an additional input that gets authenticated, but not encrypted). Other types of AE schemes appeared as well, e.g. ones that supported stateful sessions. Numerous AE schemes were designed; in the early years, these were almost exclusively blockcipher modes of operation, most notably OCB in 2001, CCM in 2003 and GCM in 2004. At the same time, issues were discovered both with the security and applicability of the most popular AE schemes, and other applications of symmetric key cryptography. As a response, the Competition for Authenticated Encryption: Security, Applicability, and Robustness (CAESAR) was started in 2013. Its goals were to identify a portfolio of new, secure and reliable AE schemes that would satisfy the needs of practical applications, and also to boost the research in the area of AE. Prompted by CAESAR, 57 new schemes were designed, new types of constructions that gained popularity appeared (such as the Sponge-based AE schemes), and new notions of security were proposed (such as RAE). The final portfolio of the CAESAR competition should be announced in 2018. In this thesis, we push the state of the art in the field of AE in several directions. All of them are related to provable security, in one way, or another. We propose OMD, the first provably secure dedicated AE scheme that is based on a compression function. We further modify OMD to achieve nonce misuse-resistant security (MRAE). We also propose another provably secure variant of OMD called pure OMD, which enjoys a great improvement of performance over OMD. Inspired by the modifications that gave rise to pure OMD, we turn to the popular Sponge-based AE schemes and prove that similar measures can also be applied to the keyed Sponge and keyed Duplex (a variant of the Sponge), allowing a substantial increase of performance without an impact on security. We then address definitional aspects of AE. We critically evaluate the security notion of OAE, whose authors claimed that it provides the best possible security for online schemes under nonce reuse. We challenge these claims, and discuss what are the meaningful requirements for online AE schemes. Based on our findings, we formulate a new definition of online AE security under nonce-reuse, and demonstrate its feasibility. We next turn our attention to the security of nonce-based AE schemes under stretch misuse; i.e. when a scheme is used with varying ciphertext expansion under the same key, even though it should not be. We argue that varying the stretch is plausible, and formulate several notions that capture security in presence of variable stretch. We establish their relations to previous notions, and demonstrate the feasibility of security in this setting. We finally depart from provable security, with the intention to complement it. We compose a survey of universal forgeries, decryption attacks and key recovery attacks on 3rd round CAESAR candidates