CURRENT APPROACHES IN MODERN CRYPTOLOGY

This work proposes a brief analysis of the different types of current approaches to modern cryptology in present days. Due to increased development of communications and IT technologies, the field of cryptography practical approaches exceeded your government / military / intelligence / bank, eventually passing the civil environment and / or private. This process has soared in recent years and the requirements of market economy have forced a trend towards standardization of the theory and practice in cryptology. From there follows a rapid dissemination, sometimes without authorized assessment any official post by a wide range of users, including the private sector. This purposes as stated above, we try an analysis of current patterns of cryptology approach to find action ways for national authorized entities to follow in the near future to synchronize efforts made in the same field of other countries and / or alliances or international organizations. Finally, it should be noted that we considered only the approach of the different types of entities of the cryptologic phenomenon, without regard to side - the scientific approach, which may be subject to other works.cryptology

Cyber Babel: Finding the Lingua Franca in Cybersecurity Regulation

Cybersecurity regulations have proliferated over the past few years as the significance of the threat has drawn more attention. With breaches making headlines, the public and their representatives are imposing requirements on those that hold sensitive data with renewed vigor. As high-value targets that hold large amounts of sensitive data, financial institutions are among the most heavily regulated. Regulations are necessary. However, regulations also come with costs that impact both large and small companies, their customers, and local, national, and international economies. As the regulations have proliferated so have those costs. The regulations will inevitably and justifiably diverge where different governments view the needs of their citizens differently. However, that should not prevent regulators from recognizing areas of agreement. This Note examines the regulatory regimes governing the data and cybersecurity practices of financial institutions implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Department of Financial Services, and the General Data Protection Regulations of the European Union to identify areas where requirements overlap, with the goal of suggesting implementations that promote consistency, clarity, and cost reduction