Text Summarization Techniques: A Brief Survey

In recent years, there has been a explosion in the amount of text data from a variety of sources. This volume of text is an invaluable source of information and knowledge which needs to be effectively summarized to be useful. In this review, the main approaches to automatic text summarization are described. We review the different processes for summarization and describe the effectiveness and shortcomings of the different methods.Comment: Some of references format have update

A Supervised Approach to Extractive Summarisation of Scientific Papers

Automatic summarisation is a popular approach to reduce a document to its main arguments. Recent research in the area has focused on neural approaches to summarisation, which can be very data-hungry. However, few large datasets exist and none for the traditionally popular domain of scientific publications, which opens up challenging research avenues centered on encoding large, complex documents. In this paper, we introduce a new dataset for summarisation of computer science publications by exploiting a large resource of author provided summaries and show straightforward ways of extending it further. We develop models on the dataset making use of both neural sentence encoding and traditionally used summarisation features and show that models which encode sentences as well as their local and global context perform best, significantly outperforming well-established baseline methods.Comment: 11 pages, 6 figure

Hierarchical Catalogue Generation for Literature Review: A Benchmark

Multi-document scientific summarization can extract and organize important information from an abundant collection of papers, arousing widespread attention recently. However, existing efforts focus on producing lengthy overviews lacking a clear and logical hierarchy. To alleviate this problem, we present an atomic and challenging task named Hierarchical Catalogue Generation for Literature Review (HiCatGLR), which aims to generate a hierarchical catalogue for a review paper given various references. We carefully construct a novel English Hierarchical Catalogues of Literature Reviews Dataset (HiCaD) with 13.8k literature review catalogues and 120k reference papers, where we benchmark diverse experiments via the end-to-end and pipeline methods. To accurately assess the model performance, we design evaluation metrics for similarity to ground truth from semantics and structure. Besides, our extensive analyses verify the high quality of our dataset and the effectiveness of our evaluation metrics. Furthermore, we discuss potential directions for this task to motivate future research