81 research outputs found

    Mixing under monotone censoring

    Full text link
    We initiate the study of mixing times of Markov chain under monotone censoring. Suppose we have some Markov Chain MM on a state space Ω\Omega with stationary distribution π\pi and a monotone set AΩA \subset \Omega. We consider the chain MM' which is the same as the chain MM started at some xAx \in A except that moves of MM of the form xyx \to y where xAx \in A and yAy \notin A are {\em censored} and replaced by the move xxx \to x. If MM is ergodic and AA is connected, the new chain converges to π\pi conditional on AA. In this paper we are interested in the mixing time of the chain MM' in terms of properties of MM and AA. Our results are based on new connections with the field of property testing. A number of open problems are presented.Comment: 6 page

    Improved Lower Bounds for Testing Triangle-freeness in Boolean Functions via Fast Matrix Multiplication

    Get PDF
    Understanding the query complexity for testing linear-invariant properties has been a central open problem in the study of algebraic property testing. Triangle-freeness in Boolean functions is a simple property whose testing complexity is unknown. Three Boolean functions f1f_1, f2f_2 and f3:F2k{0,1}f_3: \mathbb{F}_2^k \to \{0, 1\} are said to be triangle free if there is no x,yF2kx, y \in \mathbb{F}_2^k such that f1(x)=f2(y)=f3(x+y)=1f_1(x) = f_2(y) = f_3(x + y) = 1. This property is known to be strongly testable (Green 2005), but the number of queries needed is upper-bounded only by a tower of twos whose height is polynomial in 1 / \epsislon, where \epsislon is the distance between the tested function triple and triangle-freeness, i.e., the minimum fraction of function values that need to be modified to make the triple triangle free. A lower bound of (1/ϵ)2.423(1 / \epsilon)^{2.423} for any one-sided tester was given by Bhattacharyya and Xie (2010). In this work we improve this bound to (1/ϵ)6.619(1 / \epsilon)^{6.619}. Interestingly, we prove this by way of a combinatorial construction called \emph{uniquely solvable puzzles} that was at the heart of Coppersmith and Winograd's renowned matrix multiplication algorithm

    Testing Booleanity and the Uncertainty Principle

    Get PDF
    Let f:{-1,1}^n -> R be a real function on the hypercube, given by its discrete Fourier expansion, or, equivalently, represented as a multilinear polynomial. We say that it is Boolean if its image is in {-1,1}. We show that every function on the hypercube with a sparse Fourier expansion must either be Boolean or far from Boolean. In particular, we show that a multilinear polynomial with at most k terms must either be Boolean, or output values different than -1 or 1 for a fraction of at least 2/(k+2)^2 of its domain. It follows that given oracle access to f, together with the guarantee that its representation as a multilinear polynomial has at most k terms, one can test Booleanity using O(k^2) queries. We show an \Omega(k) queries lower bound for this problem. Our proof crucially uses Hirschman's entropic version of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.Comment: 15 page

    A Hypergraph Dictatorship Test with Perfect Completeness

    Full text link
    A hypergraph dictatorship test is first introduced by Samorodnitsky and Trevisan and serves as a key component in their unique games based \PCP construction. Such a test has oracle access to a collection of functions and determines whether all the functions are the same dictatorship, or all their low degree influences are o(1).o(1). Their test makes q3q\geq3 queries and has amortized query complexity 1+O(logqq)1+O(\frac{\log q}{q}) but has an inherent loss of perfect completeness. In this paper we give an adaptive hypergraph dictatorship test that achieves both perfect completeness and amortized query complexity 1+O(logqq)1+O(\frac{\log q}{q}).Comment: Some minor correction

    Quantum Property Testing

    Get PDF
    A language L has a property tester if there exists a probabilistic algorithm that given an input x only asks a small number of bits of x and distinguishes the cases as to whether x is in L and x has large Hamming distance from all y in L. We define a similar notion of quantum property testing and show that there exist languages with quantum property testers but no good classical testers. We also show there exist languages which require a large number of queries even for quantumly testing
    corecore