Rethinking serializable multiversion concurrency control

Multi-versioned database systems have the potential to significantly increase the amount of concurrency in transaction processing because they can avoid read-write conflicts. Unfortunately, the increase in concurrency usually comes at the cost of transaction serializability. If a database user requests full serializability, modern multi-versioned systems significantly constrain read-write concurrency among conflicting transactions and employ expensive synchronization patterns in their design. In main-memory multi-core settings, these additional constraints are so burdensome that multi-versioned systems are often significantly outperformed by single-version systems. We propose Bohm, a new concurrency control protocol for main-memory multi-versioned database systems. Bohm guarantees serializable execution while ensuring that reads never block writes. In addition, Bohm does not require reads to perform any book-keeping whatsoever, thereby avoiding the overhead of tracking reads via contended writes to shared memory. This leads to excellent scalability and performance in multi-core settings. Bohm has all the above characteristics without performing validation based concurrency control. Instead, it is pessimistic, and is therefore not prone to excessive aborts in the presence of contention. An experimental evaluation shows that Bohm performs well in both high contention and low contention settings, and is able to dramatically outperform state-of-the-art multi-versioned systems despite maintaining the full set of serializability guarantees

Locking Timestamps Versus Locking Objects

We present multiversion timestamp locking (MVTL), a new genre of multiversion concurrency control algorithms for serializable transactions. The key idea behind MVTL is simple and novel: lock individual time points instead of locking objects or versions. After showing what a generic MVTL algorithm looks like, we demonstrate MVTL’s expressiveness: we present several simple MVTL algorithms that address limitations of current multiversion schemes, by committing trans- actions that previous schemes would abort, by avoiding the problem of serial aborts and ghost aborts, and by offering a way to prioritize transactions that should not be aborted

Bringing modular concurrency control to the next level

Database users face a tension between ease-of-programming and high performance: ACID transactions can greatly simplify the programming effort of database applications by providing four useful properties—atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability, but enforcing these properties can degrade performance. This dissertation eases this tension by improving the performance of ACID transactions for scenarios where data contention is the bottleneck. The approach that we take is federating concurrency control (CC) mechanisms. It is based on the observation that any single CC mechanism is bound to make trade-offs that cause it to perform well in some cases but poorly in others. A federation opens the opportunity of applying each mechanism only to the set of transactions or workloads where it shines, while maintaining isolation. In particular, this work builds upon Modular Concurrency Control (MCC), a recent technique that federates CCs by partitioning transactions into groups, and by applying different CC mechanisms in each group. This dissertation addresses two critical shortcomings in the current embodiment of MCC. First, cross-group data conflicts are handled with a single, unoptimized CC mechanism that can significantly limit performance. Second, configuring MCC is a complex task, which runs counter to MCC’s purpose: to improve performance without sacrificing ease-of-programming. To address these problems, this dissertation presents Tebaldi, a new transactional database that brings Modular Concurrency Control to the next level, both figuratively and literally. Tebaldi introduces a new, hierarchical model to MCC that partitions transactions recursively to compose CC mechanisms in a multi-level tree. This model increases flexibility in federating CC mechanisms, which is the key to realizing the performance potential of federation. Tebaldi reduces configuration complexity by managing the MCC federation automatically: it can detect performance issues in the current workload in real-time, and automatically adjusts its configuration to improve its performance.Computer Science