16 research outputs found
MUDA: A Truthful Multi-Unit Double-Auction Mechanism
In a seminal paper, McAfee (1992) presented a truthful mechanism for double
auctions, attaining asymptotically-optimal gain-from-trade without any prior
information on the valuations of the traders. McAfee's mechanism handles
single-parametric agents, allowing each seller to sell a single unit and each
buyer to buy a single unit. This paper presents a double-auction mechanism that
handles multi-parametric agents and allows multiple units per trader, as long
as the valuation functions of all traders have decreasing marginal returns. The
mechanism is prior-free, ex-post individually-rational, dominant-strategy
truthful and strongly-budget-balanced. Its gain-from-trade approaches the
optimum when the market size is sufficiently large.Comment: Accepted to the AAAI2018 conferenc
Double Auctions in Markets for Multiple Kinds of Goods
Motivated by applications such as stock exchanges and spectrum auctions,
there is a growing interest in mechanisms for arranging trade in two-sided
markets. Existing mechanisms are either not truthful, or do not guarantee an
asymptotically-optimal gain-from-trade, or rely on a prior on the traders'
valuations, or operate in limited settings such as a single kind of good. We
extend the random market-halving technique used in earlier works to markets
with multiple kinds of goods, where traders have gross-substitute valuations.
We present MIDA: a Multi Item-kind Double-Auction mechanism. It is prior-free,
truthful, strongly-budget-balanced, and guarantees near-optimal gain from trade
when market sizes of all goods grow to at a similar rate.Comment: Full version of IJCAI-18 paper, with 2 figures. Previous names:
"MIDA: A Multi Item-type Double-Auction Mechanism", "A Random-Sampling
Double-Auction Mechanism". 10 page
Learning Theory and Algorithms for Revenue Optimization in Second-Price Auctions with Reserve
Second-price auctions with reserve play a critical role for modern search
engine and popular online sites since the revenue of these companies often
directly de- pends on the outcome of such auctions. The choice of the reserve
price is the main mechanism through which the auction revenue can be influenced
in these electronic markets. We cast the problem of selecting the reserve price
to optimize revenue as a learning problem and present a full theoretical
analysis dealing with the complex properties of the corresponding loss
function. We further give novel algorithms for solving this problem and report
the results of several experiments in both synthetic and real data
demonstrating their effectiveness.Comment: Accepted at ICML 201
Envy Freedom and Prior-free Mechanism Design
We consider the provision of an abstract service to single-dimensional
agents. Our model includes position auctions, single-minded combinatorial
auctions, and constrained matching markets. When the agents' values are drawn
from a distribution, the Bayesian optimal mechanism is given by Myerson (1981)
as a virtual-surplus optimizer. We develop a framework for prior-free mechanism
design and analysis. A good mechanism in our framework approximates the optimal
mechanism for the distribution if there is a distribution; moreover, when there
is no distribution this mechanism still performs well.
We define and characterize optimal envy-free outcomes in symmetric
single-dimensional environments. Our characterization mirrors Myerson's theory.
Furthermore, unlike in mechanism design where there is no point-wise optimal
mechanism, there is always a point-wise optimal envy-free outcome.
Envy-free outcomes and incentive-compatible mechanisms are similar in
structure and performance. We therefore use the optimal envy-free revenue as a
benchmark for measuring the performance of a prior-free mechanism. A good
mechanism is one that approximates the envy free benchmark on any profile of
agent values. We show that good mechanisms exist, and in particular, a natural
generalization of the random sampling auction of Goldberg et al. (2001) is a
constant approximation
A General Theory of Sample Complexity for Multi-Item Profit Maximization
The design of profit-maximizing multi-item mechanisms is a notoriously
challenging problem with tremendous real-world impact. The mechanism designer's
goal is to field a mechanism with high expected profit on the distribution over
buyers' values. Unfortunately, if the set of mechanisms he optimizes over is
complex, a mechanism may have high empirical profit over a small set of samples
but low expected profit. This raises the question, how many samples are
sufficient to ensure that the empirically optimal mechanism is nearly optimal
in expectation? We uncover structure shared by a myriad of pricing, auction,
and lottery mechanisms that allows us to prove strong sample complexity bounds:
for any set of buyers' values, profit is a piecewise linear function of the
mechanism's parameters. We prove new bounds for mechanism classes not yet
studied in the sample-based mechanism design literature and match or improve
over the best known guarantees for many classes. The profit functions we study
are significantly different from well-understood functions in machine learning,
so our analysis requires a sharp understanding of the interplay between
mechanism parameters and buyer values. We strengthen our main results with
data-dependent bounds when the distribution over buyers' values is
"well-behaved." Finally, we investigate a fundamental tradeoff in sample-based
mechanism design: complex mechanisms often have higher profit than simple
mechanisms, but more samples are required to ensure that empirical and expected
profit are close. We provide techniques for optimizing this tradeoff