139,436 research outputs found

    A Run-Time Decision Procedure for Responsive Computing Systems

    Get PDF
    A responsive computing system is a hybrid of real-time, distributed and fault-tolerant systems. In such a system, severe consequences will occur if the logical and physical specifications of the system are not met. In this paper, we present a logic, Interval Temporal Logic (ITL), to specify responsive systems and give decision procedures to verify properties of the system at run-time as follows. First, we collect, during execution, events occurring in the system to represent a distributed computation. Next, we specify properties of the system using ITL formulas. Finally, we apply the decision procedures to determine satisfaction of the formulas. Thus, we can verify properties of the system at run-time using these decision procedures

    Real-time and Probabilistic Temporal Logics: An Overview

    Full text link
    Over the last two decades, there has been an extensive study on logical formalisms for specifying and verifying real-time systems. Temporal logics have been an important research subject within this direction. Although numerous logics have been introduced for the formal specification of real-time and complex systems, an up to date comprehensive analysis of these logics does not exist in the literature. In this paper we analyse real-time and probabilistic temporal logics which have been widely used in this field. We extrapolate the notions of decidability, axiomatizability, expressiveness, model checking, etc. for each logic analysed. We also provide a comparison of features of the temporal logics discussed

    Model checking Quantitative Linear Time Logic

    Get PDF
    This paper considers QLtl, a quantitative analagon of Ltl and presents algorithms for model checking QLtl over quantitative versions of Kripke structures and Markov chains

    Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications

    Full text link
    Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes, thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN) paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial

    Robust Satisfaction of Temporal Logic Specifications via Reinforcement Learning

    Full text link
    We consider the problem of steering a system with unknown, stochastic dynamics to satisfy a rich, temporally layered task given as a signal temporal logic formula. We represent the system as a Markov decision process in which the states are built from a partition of the state space and the transition probabilities are unknown. We present provably convergent reinforcement learning algorithms to maximize the probability of satisfying a given formula and to maximize the average expected robustness, i.e., a measure of how strongly the formula is satisfied. We demonstrate via a pair of robot navigation simulation case studies that reinforcement learning with robustness maximization performs better than probability maximization in terms of both probability of satisfaction and expected robustness.Comment: 8 pages, 4 figure
    corecore