Generating Adaptive and Robust Filter Sets Using an Unsupervised Learning Framework

In this paper, we introduce an adaptive unsupervised learning framework, which utilizes natural images to train filter sets. The applicability of these filter sets is demonstrated by evaluating their performance in two contrasting applications - image quality assessment and texture retrieval. While assessing image quality, the filters need to capture perceptual differences based on dissimilarities between a reference image and its distorted version. In texture retrieval, the filters need to assess similarity between texture images to retrieve closest matching textures. Based on experiments, we show that the filter responses span a set in which a monotonicity-based metric can measure both the perceptual dissimilarity of natural images and the similarity of texture images. In addition, we corrupt the images in the test set and demonstrate that the proposed method leads to robust and reliable retrieval performance compared to existing methods.Comment: Paper:5 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables and Poster [Ancillary files

UNIQUE: Unsupervised Image Quality Estimation

In this paper, we estimate perceived image quality using sparse representations obtained from generic image databases through an unsupervised learning approach. A color space transformation, a mean subtraction, and a whitening operation are used to enhance descriptiveness of images by reducing spatial redundancy; a linear decoder is used to obtain sparse representations; and a thresholding stage is used to formulate suppression mechanisms in a visual system. A linear decoder is trained with 7 GB worth of data, which corresponds to 100,000 8x8 image patches randomly obtained from nearly 1,000 images in the ImageNet 2013 database. A patch-wise training approach is preferred to maintain local information. The proposed quality estimator UNIQUE is tested on the LIVE, the Multiply Distorted LIVE, and the TID 2013 databases and compared with thirteen quality estimators. Experimental results show that UNIQUE is generally a top performing quality estimator in terms of accuracy, consistency, linearity, and monotonic behavior.Comment: 12 pages, 5 figures, 2 table

Subjective and objective quality assessment of ancient degraded documents

Archiving, restoration and analysis of damaged manuscripts have been largely increased in recent decades. Usually, these documents are physically degraded because of aging and improper handing. They also cannot be processed manually because a massive volume of these documents exist in libraries and archives around the world. Therefore, automatic methodologies are needed to preserve and to process their content. These documents are usually processed through their images. Degraded document image processing is a difficult task mainly because of the existing physical degradations. While it can be very difficult to accurately locate and remove such distortions, analyzing the severity and type(s) of these distortions is feasible. This analysis provides useful information on the type and severity of degradations with a number of applications. The main contributions of this thesis are to propose models for objectively assessing the physical condition of document images and to classify their degradations. In this thesis, three datasets of degraded document images along with the subjective ratings for each image are developed. In addition, three no-reference document image quality assessment (NR-DIQA) metrics are proposed for historical and medieval document images. It should be mentioned that degraded medieval document images are a subset of the historical document images and may contain both graphical and textual content. Finally, we propose a degradation classification model in order to identify common distortion types in old document images. Essentially, existing no reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) metrics are not designed to assess physical document distortions. In the first contribution, we propose the first dataset of degraded document images along with the human opinion scores for each document image. This dataset is introduced to evaluate the quality of historical document images. We also propose an objective NR-DIQA metric based on the statistics of the mean subtracted contrast normalized (MSCN) coefficients computed from segmented layers of each document image. The segmentation into four layers of foreground and background is done based on an analysis of the log-Gabor filters. This segmentation is based on the assumption that the sensitivity of the human visual system (HVS) is different at the locations of text and non-text. Experimental results show that the proposed metric has comparable or better performance than the state-of-the-art metrics, while it has a moderate complexity. Degradation identification and quality assessment can complement each other to provide information on both type and severity of degradations in document images. Therefore, we introduced, in the second contribution, a multi-distortion historical document image database that can be used for the research on quality assessment of degraded documents as well as degradation classification. The developed dataset contains historical document images which are classified into four categories based on their distortion types, namely, paper translucency, stain, readers’ annotations, and worn holes. An efficient NR-DIQA metric is then proposed based on three sets of spatial and frequency image features extracted from two layers of text and non-text. In addition, these features are used to estimate the probability of the four aforementioned physical distortions for the first time in the literature. Both proposed quality assessment and degradation classification models deliver a very promising performance. Finally, we develop in the third contribution a dataset and a quality assessment metric for degraded medieval document (DMD) images. This type of degraded images contains both textual and pictorial information. The introduced DMD dataset is the first dataset in its category that also provides human ratings. Also, we propose a new no-reference metric in order to evaluate the quality of DMD images in the developed dataset. The proposed metric is based on the extraction of several statistical features from three layers of text, non-text, and graphics. The segmentation is based on color saliency with assumption that pictorial parts are colorful. It also follows HVS that gives different weights to each layer. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed NR-DIQA strategy for DMD images