62,666 research outputs found

    Wadge Degrees of ω\omega-Languages of Petri Nets

    Full text link
    We prove that ω\omega-languages of (non-deterministic) Petri nets and ω\omega-languages of (non-deterministic) Turing machines have the same topological complexity: the Borel and Wadge hierarchies of the class of ω\omega-languages of (non-deterministic) Petri nets are equal to the Borel and Wadge hierarchies of the class of ω\omega-languages of (non-deterministic) Turing machines which also form the class of effective analytic sets. In particular, for each non-null recursive ordinal α<ω_1CK\alpha < \omega\_1^{{\rm CK}} there exist some Σ0_α{\bf \Sigma}^0\_\alpha-complete and some Π0_α{\bf \Pi}^0\_\alpha-complete ω\omega-languages of Petri nets, and the supremum of the set of Borel ranks of ω\omega-languages of Petri nets is the ordinal γ_21\gamma\_2^1, which is strictly greater than the first non-recursive ordinal ω_1CK\omega\_1^{{\rm CK}}. We also prove that there are some Σ_11{\bf \Sigma}\_1^1-complete, hence non-Borel, ω\omega-languages of Petri nets, and that it is consistent with ZFC that there exist some ω\omega-languages of Petri nets which are neither Borel nor Σ_11{\bf \Sigma}\_1^1-complete. This answers the question of the topological complexity of ω\omega-languages of (non-deterministic) Petri nets which was left open in [DFR14,FS14].Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0712.1359, arXiv:0804.326

    Highly Undecidable Problems For Infinite Computations

    Get PDF
    We show that many classical decision problems about 1-counter omega-languages, context free omega-languages, or infinitary rational relations, are Π21\Pi_2^1-complete, hence located at the second level of the analytical hierarchy, and "highly undecidable". In particular, the universality problem, the inclusion problem, the equivalence problem, the determinizability problem, the complementability problem, and the unambiguity problem are all Π21\Pi_2^1-complete for context-free omega-languages or for infinitary rational relations. Topological and arithmetical properties of 1-counter omega-languages, context free omega-languages, or infinitary rational relations, are also highly undecidable. These very surprising results provide the first examples of highly undecidable problems about the behaviour of very simple finite machines like 1-counter automata or 2-tape automata.Comment: to appear in RAIRO-Theoretical Informatics and Application

    Borel Ranks and Wadge Degrees of Context Free Omega Languages

    Get PDF
    We show that, from a topological point of view, considering the Borel and the Wadge hierarchies, 1-counter B\"uchi automata have the same accepting power than Turing machines equipped with a B\"uchi acceptance condition. In particular, for every non null recursive ordinal alpha, there exist some Sigma^0_alpha-complete and some Pi^0_alpha-complete omega context free languages accepted by 1-counter B\"uchi automata, and the supremum of the set of Borel ranks of context free omega languages is the ordinal gamma^1_2 which is strictly greater than the first non recursive ordinal. This very surprising result gives answers to questions of H. Lescow and W. Thomas [Logical Specifications of Infinite Computations, In:"A Decade of Concurrency", LNCS 803, Springer, 1994, p. 583-621]

    Fast Two-Sample Testing with Analytic Representations of Probability Measures

    Full text link
    We propose a class of nonparametric two-sample tests with a cost linear in the sample size. Two tests are given, both based on an ensemble of distances between analytic functions representing each of the distributions. The first test uses smoothed empirical characteristic functions to represent the distributions, the second uses distribution embeddings in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. Analyticity implies that differences in the distributions may be detected almost surely at a finite number of randomly chosen locations/frequencies. The new tests are consistent against a larger class of alternatives than the previous linear-time tests based on the (non-smoothed) empirical characteristic functions, while being much faster than the current state-of-the-art quadratic-time kernel-based or energy distance-based tests. Experiments on artificial benchmarks and on challenging real-world testing problems demonstrate that our tests give a better power/time tradeoff than competing approaches, and in some cases, better outright power than even the most expensive quadratic-time tests. This performance advantage is retained even in high dimensions, and in cases where the difference in distributions is not observable with low order statistics

    The Complexity of Infinite Computations In Models of Set Theory

    Get PDF
    We prove the following surprising result: there exist a 1-counter B\"uchi automaton and a 2-tape B\"uchi automaton such that the \omega-language of the first and the infinitary rational relation of the second in one model of ZFC are \pi_2^0-sets, while in a different model of ZFC both are analytic but non Borel sets. This shows that the topological complexity of an \omega-language accepted by a 1-counter B\"uchi automaton or of an infinitary rational relation accepted by a 2-tape B\"uchi automaton is not determined by the axiomatic system ZFC. We show that a similar result holds for the class of languages of infinite pictures which are recognized by B\"uchi tiling systems. We infer from the proof of the above results an improvement of the lower bound of some decision problems recently studied by the author

    Real Hypercomputation and Continuity

    Full text link
    By the sometimes so-called 'Main Theorem' of Recursive Analysis, every computable real function is necessarily continuous. We wonder whether and which kinds of HYPERcomputation allow for the effective evaluation of also discontinuous f:R->R. More precisely the present work considers the following three super-Turing notions of real function computability: * relativized computation; specifically given oracle access to the Halting Problem 0' or its jump 0''; * encoding real input x and/or output y=f(x) in weaker ways also related to the Arithmetic Hierarchy; * non-deterministic computation. It turns out that any f:R->R computable in the first or second sense is still necessarily continuous whereas the third type of hypercomputation does provide the required power to evaluate for instance the discontinuous sign function.Comment: previous version (extended abstract) has appeared in pp.562-571 of "Proc. 1st Conference on Computability in Europe" (CiE'05), Springer LNCS vol.352
    corecore