Patching Neural Barrier Functions Using Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability

Learning-based control algorithms have led to major advances in robotics at the cost of decreased safety guarantees. Recently, neural networks have also been used to characterize safety through the use of barrier functions for complex nonlinear systems. Learned barrier functions approximately encode and enforce a desired safety constraint through a value function, but do not provide any formal guarantees. In this paper, we propose a local dynamic programming (DP) based approach to "patch" an almost-safe learned barrier at potentially unsafe points in the state space. This algorithm, HJ-Patch, obtains a novel barrier that provides formal safety guarantees, yet retains the global structure of the learned barrier. Our local DP based reachability algorithm, HJ-Patch, updates the barrier function "minimally" at points that both (a) neighbor the barrier safety boundary and (b) do not satisfy the safety condition. We view this as a key step to bridging the gap between learning-based barrier functions and Hamilton-Jacobi reachability analysis, providing a framework for further integration of these approaches. We demonstrate that for well-trained barriers we reduce the computational load by 2 orders of magnitude with respect to standard DP-based reachability, and demonstrate scalability to a 6-dimensional system, which is at the limit of standard DP-based reachability.Comment: 8 pages, submitted to IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 202

Viability in State-Action Space: Connecting Morphology, Control, and Learning

Wie können wir Robotern ermöglichen, modellfrei und direkt auf der Hardware zu lernen? Das maschinelle Lernen nimmt als Standardwerkzeug im Arsenal des Robotikers seinen Platz ein. Es gibt jedoch einige offene Fragen, wie man die Kontrolle über physikalische Systeme lernen kann. Diese Arbeit gibt zwei Antworten auf diese motivierende Frage. Das erste ist ein formales Mittel, um die inhärente Robustheit eines gegebenen Systemdesigns zu quantifizieren, bevor der Controller oder das Lernverfahren entworfen wird. Dies unterstreicht die Notwendigkeit, sowohl das Hardals auch das Software-Design eines Roboters zu berücksichtigen, da beide Aspekte in der Systemdynamik untrennbar miteinander verbunden sind. Die zweite ist die Formalisierung einer Sicherheitsmass, die modellfrei erlernt werden kann. Intuitiv zeigt diese Mass an, wie leicht ein Roboter Fehlschläge vermeiden kann. Auf diese Weise können Roboter unbekannte Umgebungen erkunden und gleichzeitig Ausfälle vermeiden. Die wichtigsten Beiträge dieser Dissertation basieren sich auf der Viabilitätstheorie. Viabilität bietet eine alternative Sichtweise auf dynamische Systeme: Anstatt sich auf die Konvergenzeigenschaften eines Systems in Richtung Gleichgewichte zu konzentrieren, wird der Fokus auf Menge von Fehlerzuständen und die Fähigkeit des Systems, diese zu vermeiden, verlagert. Diese Sichtweise eignet sich besonders gut für das Studium der Lernkontrolle an Robotern, da Stabilität im Sinne einer Konvergenz während des Lernprozesses selten gewährleistet werden kann. Der Begriff der Viabilität wird formal auf den Zustand-Aktion-Raum erweitert, mit Viabilitätsmengen von Staat-Aktionspaaren. Eine über diese Mengen definierte Mass ermöglicht eine quantifizierte Bewertung der Robustheit, die für die Familie aller fehlervermeidenden Regler gilt, und ebnet den Weg für ein sicheres, modellfreies Lernen. Die Arbeit beinhaltet auch zwei kleinere Beiträge. Der erste kleine Beitrag ist eine empirische Demonstration der Shaping durch ausschliessliche Modifikation der Systemdynamik. Diese Demonstration verdeutlicht die Bedeutung der Robustheit gegenüber Fehlern für die Lernkontrolle: Ausfälle können nicht nur Schäden verursachen, sondern liefern in der Regel auch keine nützlichen Gradienteninformationen für den Lernprozess. Der zweite kleine Beitrag ist eine Studie über die Wahl der Zustandsinitialisierungen. Entgegen der Intuition und der üblichen Praxis zeigt diese Studie, dass es zuverlässiger sein kann, das System gelegentlich aus einem Zustand zu initialisieren, der bekanntermassen unkontrollierbar ist.How can we enable robots to learn control model-free and directly on hardware? Machine learning is taking its place as a standard tool in the roboticist’s arsenal. However, there are several open questions on how to learn control for physical systems. This thesis provides two answers to this motivating question. The first is a formal means to quantify the inherent robustness of a given system design, prior to designing the controller or learning agent. This emphasizes the need to consider both the hardware and software design of a robot, which are inseparably intertwined in the system dynamics. The second is the formalization of a safety-measure, which can be learned model-free. Intuitively, this measure indicates how easily a robot can avoid failure, and enables robots to explore unknown environments while avoiding failures. The main contributions of this dissertation are based on viability theory. Viability theory provides a slightly unconventional view of dynamical systems: instead of focusing on a system’s convergence properties towards equilibria, the focus is shifted towards sets of failure states and the system’s ability to avoid these sets. This view is particularly well suited to studying learning control in robots, since stability in the sense of convergence can rarely be guaranteed during the learning process. The notion of viability is formally extended to state-action space, with viable sets of state-action pairs. A measure defined over these sets allows a quantified evaluation of robustness valid for the family of all failure-avoiding control policies, and also paves the way for enabling safe model-free learning. The thesis also includes two minor contributions. The first minor contribution is an empirical demonstration of shaping by exclusively modifying the system dynamics. This demonstration highlights the importance of robustness to failures for learning control: not only can failures cause damage, but they typically do not provide useful gradient information for the learning process. The second minor contribution is a study on the choice of state initializations. Counter to intuition and common practice, this study shows it can be more reliable to occasionally initialize the system from a state that is known to be uncontrollable

Parameter-Conditioned Reachable Sets for Updating Safety Assurances Online

Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability analysis is a powerful tool for analyzing the safety of autonomous systems. However, the provided safety assurances are often predicated on the assumption that once deployed, the system or its environment does not evolve. Online, however, an autonomous system might experience changes in system dynamics, control authority, external disturbances, and/or the surrounding environment, requiring updated safety assurances. Rather than restarting the safety analysis from scratch, which can be time-consuming and often intractable to perform online, we propose to compute \textit{parameter-conditioned} reachable sets. Assuming expected system and environment changes can be parameterized, we treat these parameters as virtual states in the system and leverage recent advances in high-dimensional reachability analysis to solve the corresponding reachability problem offline. This results in a family of reachable sets that is parameterized by the environment and system factors. Online, as these factors change, the system can simply query the corresponding safety function from this family to ensure system safety, enabling a real-time update of the safety assurances. Through various simulation studies, we demonstrate the capability of our approach in maintaining system safety despite the system and environment evolution