4 research outputs found

    The benefit of a 1-bit jump-start, and the necessity of stochastic encoding, in jamming channels

    Full text link
    We consider the problem of communicating a message mm in the presence of a malicious jamming adversary (Calvin), who can erase an arbitrary set of up to pnpn bits, out of nn transmitted bits (x1,,xn)(x_1,\ldots,x_n). The capacity of such a channel when Calvin is exactly causal, i.e. Calvin's decision of whether or not to erase bit xix_i depends on his observations (x1,,xi)(x_1,\ldots,x_i) was recently characterized to be 12p1-2p. In this work we show two (perhaps) surprising phenomena. Firstly, we demonstrate via a novel code construction that if Calvin is delayed by even a single bit, i.e. Calvin's decision of whether or not to erase bit xix_i depends only on (x1,,xi1)(x_1,\ldots,x_{i-1}) (and is independent of the "current bit" xix_i) then the capacity increases to 1p1-p when the encoder is allowed to be stochastic. Secondly, we show via a novel jamming strategy for Calvin that, in the single-bit-delay setting, if the encoding is deterministic (i.e. the transmitted codeword is a deterministic function of the message mm) then no rate asymptotically larger than 12p1-2p is possible with vanishing probability of error, hence stochastic encoding (using private randomness at the encoder) is essential to achieve the capacity of 1p1-p against a one-bit-delayed Calvin.Comment: 21 pages, 4 figures, extended draft of submission to ISIT 201

    Upper Bounds on the Capacity of Binary Channels with Causal Adversaries

    Full text link
    In this work we consider the communication of information in the presence of a causal adversarial jammer. In the setting under study, a sender wishes to communicate a message to a receiver by transmitting a codeword (x1,...,xn)(x_1,...,x_n) bit-by-bit over a communication channel. The sender and the receiver do not share common randomness. The adversarial jammer can view the transmitted bits xix_i one at a time, and can change up to a pp-fraction of them. However, the decisions of the jammer must be made in a causal manner. Namely, for each bit xix_i the jammer's decision on whether to corrupt it or not must depend only on xjx_j for jij \leq i. This is in contrast to the "classical" adversarial jamming situations in which the jammer has no knowledge of (x1,...,xn)(x_1,...,x_n), or knows (x1,...,xn)(x_1,...,x_n) completely. In this work, we present upper bounds (that hold under both the average and maximal probability of error criteria) on the capacity which hold for both deterministic and stochastic encoding schemes.Comment: To appear in the IEEE Transactions on Information Theory; shortened version appeared at ISIT 201

    Zero-rate feedback can achieve the empirical capacity

    Full text link
    The utility of limited feedback for coding over an individual sequence of DMCs is investigated. This study complements recent results showing how limited or noisy feedback can boost the reliability of communication. A strategy with fixed input distribution PP is given that asymptotically achieves rates arbitrarily close to the mutual information induced by PP and the state-averaged channel. When the capacity achieving input distribution is the same over all channel states, this achieves rates at least as large as the capacity of the state averaged channel, sometimes called the empirical capacity.Comment: Revised version of paper originally submitted to IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Nov. 2007. This version contains further revisions and clarification
    corecore