209 research outputs found

    An updated annotated bibliography on arc routing problems

    Get PDF
    The number of arc routing publications has increased significantly in the last decade. Such an increase justifies a second annotated bibliography, a sequel to Corberรกn and Prins (Networks 56 (2010), 50โ€“69), discussing arc routing studies from 2010 onwards. These studies are grouped into three main sections: single vehicle problems, multiple vehicle problems and applications. Each main section catalogs problems according to their specifics. Section 2 is therefore composed of four subsections, namely: the Chinese Postman Problem, the Rural Postman Problem, the General Routing Problem (GRP) and Arc Routing Problems (ARPs) with profits. Section 3, devoted to the multiple vehicle case, begins with three subsections on the Capacitated Arc Routing Problem (CARP) and then delves into several variants of multiple ARPs, ending with GRPs and problems with profits. Section 4 is devoted to applications, including distribution and collection routes, outdoor activities, post-disaster operations, road cleaning and marking. As new applications emerge and existing applications continue to be used and adapted, the future of arc routing research looks promising.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Genetic programming hyper-heuristic with vehicle collaboration for uncertain capacitated arc routing problem

    Get PDF
    Due to its direct relevance to post-disaster operations, meter reading and civil refuse collection, the Uncertain Capacitated Arc Routing Problem (UCARP) is an important optimisation problem. Stochastic models are critical to study as they more accurately represent the real world than their deterministic counterparts. Although there have been extensive studies in solving routing problems under uncertainty, very few have considered UCARP, and none consider collaboration between vehicles to handle the negative effects of uncertainty. This article proposes a novel Solution Construction Procedure (SCP) that generates solutions to UCARP within a collaborative, multi-vehicle framework. It consists of two types of collaborative activities: one when a vehicle unexpectedly expends capacity (route failure), and the other during the refill process. Then, we propose a Genetic Programming Hyper-Heuristic (GPHH) algorithm to evolve the routing policy used within the collaborative framework. The experimental studies show that the new heuristic with vehicle collaboration and GP-evolved routing policy significantly outperforms the compared state-of-the-art algorithms on commonly studied test problems. This is shown to be especially true on instances with larger numbers of tasks and vehicles. This clearly shows the advantage of vehicle collaboration in handling the uncertain environment, and the effectiveness of the newly proposed algorithm

    Investigating edge-reordering procedures in a tabu search algorithm for the capacitated arc routing problem

    Get PDF
    This paper presents two ideas to guide a tabu search algorithm for the Capacitated Arc Routing Problem to a promising region of the solution space. Both ideas involve edge-reordering, although they work in different ways. One of them aims to directly tackle deadheading cycles, and the other tries to reorder edges with the aim of extending a scope of solutions that can be reached from a given solution. Experiments were performed on 134 benchmark instances of various sizes, and the two ideas were shown to have an ability to guide the search to good solutions. Possible issues that may arise when implementing these ideas are also discussed

    Workload Equity in Vehicle Routing Problems: A Survey and Analysis

    Full text link
    Over the past two decades, equity aspects have been considered in a growing number of models and methods for vehicle routing problems (VRPs). Equity concerns most often relate to fairly allocating workloads and to balancing the utilization of resources, and many practical applications have been reported in the literature. However, there has been only limited discussion about how workload equity should be modeled in VRPs, and various measures for optimizing such objectives have been proposed and implemented without a critical evaluation of their respective merits and consequences. This article addresses this gap with an analysis of classical and alternative equity functions for biobjective VRP models. In our survey, we review and categorize the existing literature on equitable VRPs. In the analysis, we identify a set of axiomatic properties that an ideal equity measure should satisfy, collect six common measures, and point out important connections between their properties and those of the resulting Pareto-optimal solutions. To gauge the extent of these implications, we also conduct a numerical study on small biobjective VRP instances solvable to optimality. Our study reveals two undesirable consequences when optimizing equity with nonmonotonic functions: Pareto-optimal solutions can consist of non-TSP-optimal tours, and even if all tours are TSP optimal, Pareto-optimal solutions can be workload inconsistent, i.e. composed of tours whose workloads are all equal to or longer than those of other Pareto-optimal solutions. We show that the extent of these phenomena should not be underestimated. The results of our biobjective analysis are valid also for weighted sum, constraint-based, or single-objective models. Based on this analysis, we conclude that monotonic equity functions are more appropriate for certain types of VRP models, and suggest promising avenues for further research.Comment: Accepted Manuscrip

    The stochastic vehicle routing problem : a literature review, part II : solution methods

    Get PDF
    Building on the work of Gendreau et al. (Oper Res 44(3):469โ€“477, 1996), and complementing the first part of this survey, we review the solution methods used for the past 20 years in the scientific literature on stochastic vehicle routing problems (SVRP). We describe the methods and indicate how they are used when dealing with stochastic vehicle routing problems. Keywords: vehicle routing (VRP), stochastic programmingm, SVRPpublishedVersio

    ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋“œ๋ก ์˜ ์ œ์„ค ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022.2. ๊น€๋™๊ทœ.Drones can overcome the limitation of ground vehicles by replacing the congestion time and allowing rapid service. For sudden snowfall with climate change, a quickly deployed drone can be a flexible alternative considering the deadhead route and the labor costs. The goal of this study is to optimize a drone arc routing problem (D-ARP), servicing the required roads for snow removal. A D-ARP creates computational burden especially in large network. The D-ARP has a large search space due to its exponentially increased candidate route, arc direction decision, and continuous arc space. To reduce the search space, we developed the auxiliary transformation method in ACO algorithm and adopted the random walk method. The contribution of the work is introducing a new problem and optimization approach of D-ARP in snow removal operation and reduce its search space. The optimization results confirmed that the drone travels shorter distance compared to the truck with a reduction of 5% to 22%. Furthermore, even under the length constraint model, the drone shows 4% reduction compared to the truck. The result of the test sets demonstrated that the adopted heuristic algorithm performs well in the large size networks in reasonable time. Based on the results, introducing a drone in snow removal is expected to save the operation cost in practical terms.๋“œ๋ก ์€ ํ˜ผ์žก์‹œ๊ฐ„๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•˜๊ณ  ๋น ๋ฅธ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ง€์ƒ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐ‘์ž‘์Šค๋Ÿฐ ๊ฐ•์„ค์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—, ๋“œ๋ก ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ํˆฌ์ž…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋Š” ์šดํ–‰ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์™€ ๋…ธ๋™๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ๋„ ์œ ์—ฐํ•œ ์šด์˜ ์˜ต์…˜์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๋“œ๋ก  ์•„ํฌ ๋ผ์šฐํŒ…(D-ARP)์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ œ์„ค์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋„๋กœ๋ฅผ ์„œ๋น„์Šคํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋“œ๋ก  ์•„ํฌ ๋ผ์šฐํŒ…์€ ํŠนํžˆ ํฐ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๋ถ€ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์‹œ ๋งํ•ดD-ARP๋Š” ํฐ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ธ‰์ˆ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ›„๋ณด ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋ฐ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๊ฒฐ์ • ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์—ฐ์†์ ์ธ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋ณด์กฐ๋ณ€ํ™˜๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋žœ๋ค์›Œํฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ๋Š” ์ œ์„ค ์šด์˜์— ์žˆ์–ด D-ARP๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฒ€์ƒ‰๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋“œ๋ก ์€ ์ง€์ƒํŠธ๋Ÿญ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์•ฝ 5% ~ 22%์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋น„์šฉ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ๊ธธ์ด ์ œ์•ฝ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ๋„ ๋“œ๋ก ์€ 4%์˜ ๋น„์šฉ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ ์šฉํ•œ ํœด๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ํฐ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ๋„ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์  ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์— ์ตœ์ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์Œ์„ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ๋“œ๋ก ์„ ์ œ์„ค์— ๋„์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์— ์ œ์„ค ์šด์˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ฌ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 4 1.1. Study Background 4 1.2. Purpose of Research 6 Chapter 2. Literature Review 7 2.1. Drone Arc Routing problem 7 2.2. Snow Removal Routing Problem 8 2.3. The Classic ARPs and Algorithms 9 2.4. Large Search Space and Arc direction 11 Chapter 3. Method 13 3.1. Problem Statement 13 3.2. Formulation 16 Chapter 4. Algorithm 17 4.1. Overview 17 4.2. Auxilary Transformation Method 18 4.3. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) 20 4.4. Post Process for Arc Direction Decision 23 4.5. Length Constraint and Random Walk 24 Chapter 5. Results 27 5.1. Application in Toy Network 27 5.2. Application in Real-world Networks 29 5.3. Application of the Refill Constraint in Seoul 31 Chapter 6. Conclusion 34 References 35 Acknowledgment 40์„

    Tabu Search: A Comparative Study

    Get PDF
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore