15,432 research outputs found

    Ramsey numbers for partially-ordered sets

    Full text link
    We present a refinement of Ramsey numbers by considering graphs with a partial ordering on their vertices. This is a natural extension of the ordered Ramsey numbers. We formalize situations in which we can use arbitrary families of partially-ordered sets to form host graphs for Ramsey problems. We explore connections to well studied Tur\'an-type problems in partially-ordered sets, particularly those in the Boolean lattice. We find a strong difference between Ramsey numbers on the Boolean lattice and ordered Ramsey numbers when the partial ordering on the graphs have large antichains.Comment: 18 pages, 3 figures, 1 tabl

    Poset Ramsey number R(P,Qn)R(P,Q_n). III. N-shaped poset

    Full text link
    Given partially ordered sets (posets) (P,P)(P, \leq_P) and (P,P)(P', \leq_{P'}), we say that PP' contains a copy of PP if for some injective function f ⁣:PPf\colon P\rightarrow P' and for any A,BPA, B\in P, APBA\leq _P B if and only if f(A)Pf(B)f(A)\leq_{P'} f(B). For any posets PP and QQ, the poset Ramsey number R(P,Q)R(P,Q) is the least positive integer NN such that no matter how the elements of an NN-dimensional Boolean lattice are colored in blue and red, there is either a copy of PP with all blue elements or a copy of QQ with all red elements. We focus on the poset Ramsey number R(P,Qn)R(P, Q_n) for a fixed poset PP and an nn-dimensional Boolean lattice QnQ_n, as nn grows large. It is known that n+c1(P)R(P,Qn)c2(P)nn+c_1(P) \leq R(P,Q_n) \leq c_2(P) n, for positive constants c1c_1 and c2c_2. However, there is no poset PP known, for which R(P,Qn)>(1+ϵ)nR(P, Q_n)> (1+\epsilon)n, for ϵ>0\epsilon >0. This paper is devoted to a new method for finding upper bounds on R(P,Qn)R(P, Q_n) using a duality between copies of QnQ_n and sets of elements that cover them, referred to as blockers. We prove several properties of blockers and their direct relation to the Ramsey numbers. Using these properties we show that R(N,Qn)=n+Θ(n/logn)R(\mathcal{N},Q_n)=n+\Theta(n/\log n), for a poset N\mathcal{N} with four elements A,B,C,A, B, C, and DD, such that A<CA<C, B<DB<D, B<CB<C, and the remaining pairs of elements are incomparable.Comment: 19 pages, 6 figure

    Survey on the Tukey theory of ultrafilters

    Full text link
    This article surveys results regarding the Tukey theory of ultrafilters on countable base sets. The driving forces for this investigation are Isbell's Problem and the question of how closely related the Rudin-Keisler and Tukey reducibilities are. We review work on the possible structures of cofinal types and conditions which guarantee that an ultrafilter is below the Tukey maximum. The known canonical forms for cofinal maps on ultrafilters are reviewed, as well as their applications to finding which structures embed into the Tukey types of ultrafilters. With the addition of some Ramsey theory, fine analyses of the structures at the bottom of the Tukey hierarchy are made.Comment: 25 page

    Induced Ramsey-type results and binary predicates for point sets

    Full text link
    Let kk and pp be positive integers and let QQ be a finite point set in general position in the plane. We say that QQ is (k,p)(k,p)-Ramsey if there is a finite point set PP such that for every kk-coloring cc of (Pp)\binom{P}{p} there is a subset QQ' of PP such that QQ' and QQ have the same order type and (Qp)\binom{Q'}{p} is monochromatic in cc. Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and Valtr proved that for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}, all point sets are (k,1)(k,1)-Ramsey. They also proved that for every k2k \ge 2 and p2p \ge 2, there are point sets that are not (k,p)(k,p)-Ramsey. As our main result, we introduce a new family of (k,2)(k,2)-Ramsey point sets, extending a result of Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and Valtr. We then use this new result to show that for every kk there is a point set PP such that no function Γ\Gamma that maps ordered pairs of distinct points from PP to a set of size kk can satisfy the following "local consistency" property: if Γ\Gamma attains the same values on two ordered triples of points from PP, then these triples have the same orientation. Intuitively, this implies that there cannot be such a function that is defined locally and determines the orientation of point triples.Comment: 22 pages, 3 figures, final version, minor correction

    On the Geometric Ramsey Number of Outerplanar Graphs

    Full text link
    We prove polynomial upper bounds of geometric Ramsey numbers of pathwidth-2 outerplanar triangulations in both convex and general cases. We also prove that the geometric Ramsey numbers of the ladder graph on 2n2n vertices are bounded by O(n3)O(n^{3}) and O(n10)O(n^{10}), in the convex and general case, respectively. We then apply similar methods to prove an nO(log(n))n^{O(\log(n))} upper bound on the Ramsey number of a path with nn ordered vertices.Comment: 15 pages, 7 figure
    corecore