236 research outputs found

    Semidefinite programming bounds on the size of entanglement-assisted codeword stabilized quantum codes

    Full text link
    In this paper, we explore the application of semidefinite programming to the realm of quantum codes, specifically focusing on codeword stabilized (CWS) codes with entanglement assistance. Notably, we utilize the isotropic subgroup of the CWS group and the set of word operators of a CWS-type quantum code to derive an upper bound on the minimum distance. Furthermore, this characterization can be incorporated into the associated distance enumerators, enabling us to construct semidefinite constraints that lead to SDP bounds on the minimum distance or size of CWS-type quantum codes. We illustrate several instances where SDP bounds outperform LP bounds, and there are even cases where LP fails to yield meaningful results, while SDP consistently provides tight and relevant bounds. Finally, we also provide interpretations of the Shor-Laflamme weight enumerators and shadow enumerators for codeword stabilized codes, enhancing our understanding of quantum codes.Comment: 20 pages, 1 tabl

    Monotonicity of the quantum linear programming bound

    Get PDF
    The most powerful technique known at present for bounding the size of quantum codes of prescribed minimum distance is the quantum linear programming bound. Unlike the classical linear programming bound, it is not immediately obvious that if the quantum linear programming constraints are satisfiable for dimension K, that the constraints can be satisfied for all lower dimensions. We show that the quantum linear programming bound is indeed monotonic in this sense, and give an explicitly monotonic reformulation.Comment: 5 pages, AMSTe

    Self-Dual Codes

    Get PDF
    Self-dual codes are important because many of the best codes known are of this type and they have a rich mathematical theory. Topics covered in this survey include codes over F_2, F_3, F_4, F_q, Z_4, Z_m, shadow codes, weight enumerators, Gleason-Pierce theorem, invariant theory, Gleason theorems, bounds, mass formulae, enumeration, extremal codes, open problems. There is a comprehensive bibliography.Comment: 136 page

    Codes for Simultaneous Transmission of Quantum and Classical Information

    Full text link
    We consider the characterization as well as the construction of quantum codes that allow to transmit both quantum and classical information, which we refer to as `hybrid codes'. We construct hybrid codes [ ⁣[n,k:m,d] ⁣]q[\![n,k{: }m,d]\!]_q with length nn and distance dd, that simultaneously transmit kk qudits and mm symbols from a classical alphabet of size qq. Many good codes such as [ ⁣[7,1:1,3] ⁣]2[\![7,1{: }1,3]\!]_2, [ ⁣[9,2:2,3] ⁣]2[\![9,2{: }2,3]\!]_2, [ ⁣[10,3:2,3] ⁣]2[\![10,3{: }2,3]\!]_2, [ ⁣[11,4:2,3] ⁣]2[\![11,4{: }2,3]\!]_2, [ ⁣[11,1:2,4] ⁣]2[\![11,1{: }2,4]\!]_2, [ ⁣[13,1:4,4] ⁣]2[\![13,1{: }4,4]\!]_2, [ ⁣[13,1:1,5] ⁣]2[\![13,1{: }1,5]\!]_2, [ ⁣[14,1:2,5] ⁣]2[\![14,1{: }2,5]\!]_2, [ ⁣[15,1:3,5] ⁣]2[\![15,1{: }3,5]\!]_2, [ ⁣[19,9:1,4] ⁣]2[\![19,9{: }1,4]\!]_2, [ ⁣[20,9:2,4] ⁣]2[\![20,9{: }2,4]\!]_2, [ ⁣[21,9:3,4] ⁣]2[\![21,9{: }3,4]\!]_2, [ ⁣[22,9:4,4] ⁣]2[\![22,9{: }4,4]\!]_2 have been found. All these codes have better parameters than hybrid codes obtained from the best known stabilizer quantum codes.Comment: 6 page
    • …
    corecore