403 research outputs found
Improved Pseudorandom Generators from Pseudorandom Multi-Switching Lemmas
We give the best known pseudorandom generators for two touchstone classes in
unconditional derandomization: an -PRG for the class of size-
depth- circuits with seed length , and an -PRG for the class of -sparse
polynomials with seed length . These results bring the state of the art for
unconditional derandomization of these classes into sharp alignment with the
state of the art for computational hardness for all parameter settings:
improving on the seed lengths of either PRG would require breakthrough progress
on longstanding and notorious circuit lower bounds.
The key enabling ingredient in our approach is a new \emph{pseudorandom
multi-switching lemma}. We derandomize recently-developed
\emph{multi}-switching lemmas, which are powerful generalizations of
H{\aa}stad's switching lemma that deal with \emph{families} of depth-two
circuits. Our pseudorandom multi-switching lemma---a randomness-efficient
algorithm for sampling restrictions that simultaneously simplify all circuits
in a family---achieves the parameters obtained by the (full randomness)
multi-switching lemmas of Impagliazzo, Matthews, and Paturi [IMP12] and
H{\aa}stad [H{\aa}s14]. This optimality of our derandomization translates into
the optimality (given current circuit lower bounds) of our PRGs for
and sparse polynomials
Randomness Extraction in AC0 and with Small Locality
Randomness extractors, which extract high quality (almost-uniform) random
bits from biased random sources, are important objects both in theory and in
practice. While there have been significant progress in obtaining near optimal
constructions of randomness extractors in various settings, the computational
complexity of randomness extractors is still much less studied. In particular,
it is not clear whether randomness extractors with good parameters can be
computed in several interesting complexity classes that are much weaker than P.
In this paper we study randomness extractors in the following two models of
computation: (1) constant-depth circuits (AC0), and (2) the local computation
model. Previous work in these models, such as [Vio05a], [GVW15] and [BG13],
only achieve constructions with weak parameters. In this work we give explicit
constructions of randomness extractors with much better parameters. As an
application, we use our AC0 extractors to study pseudorandom generators in AC0,
and show that we can construct both cryptographic pseudorandom generators
(under reasonable computational assumptions) and unconditional pseudorandom
generators for space bounded computation with very good parameters.
Our constructions combine several previous techniques in randomness
extractors, as well as introduce new techniques to reduce or preserve the
complexity of extractors, which may be of independent interest. These include
(1) a general way to reduce the error of strong seeded extractors while
preserving the AC0 property and small locality, and (2) a seeded randomness
condenser with small locality.Comment: 62 page
Better Pseudorandom Generators from Milder Pseudorandom Restrictions
We present an iterative approach to constructing pseudorandom generators,
based on the repeated application of mild pseudorandom restrictions. We use
this template to construct pseudorandom generators for combinatorial rectangles
and read-once CNFs and a hitting set generator for width-3 branching programs,
all of which achieve near-optimal seed-length even in the low-error regime: We
get seed-length O(log (n/epsilon)) for error epsilon. Previously, only
constructions with seed-length O(\log^{3/2} n) or O(\log^2 n) were known for
these classes with polynomially small error.
The (pseudo)random restrictions we use are milder than those typically used
for proving circuit lower bounds in that we only set a constant fraction of the
bits at a time. While such restrictions do not simplify the functions
drastically, we show that they can be derandomized using small-bias spaces.Comment: To appear in FOCS 201
DNF Sparsification and a Faster Deterministic Counting Algorithm
Given a DNF formula on n variables, the two natural size measures are the
number of terms or size s(f), and the maximum width of a term w(f). It is
folklore that short DNF formulas can be made narrow. We prove a converse,
showing that narrow formulas can be sparsified. More precisely, any width w DNF
irrespective of its size can be -approximated by a width DNF with
at most terms.
We combine our sparsification result with the work of Luby and Velikovic to
give a faster deterministic algorithm for approximately counting the number of
satisfying solutions to a DNF. Given a formula on n variables with poly(n)
terms, we give a deterministic time algorithm
that computes an additive approximation to the fraction of
satisfying assignments of f for \epsilon = 1/\poly(\log n). The previous best
result due to Luby and Velickovic from nearly two decades ago had a run-time of
.Comment: To appear in the IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 201
Algorithms and lower bounds for de Morgan formulas of low-communication leaf gates
The class consists of Boolean functions
computable by size- de Morgan formulas whose leaves are any Boolean
functions from a class . We give lower bounds and (SAT, Learning,
and PRG) algorithms for , for classes
of functions with low communication complexity. Let
be the maximum -party NOF randomized communication
complexity of . We show:
(1) The Generalized Inner Product function cannot be computed in
on more than fraction of inputs
for As a corollary, we get an average-case lower bound for
against .
(2) There is a PRG of seed length that -fools . For
, we get the better seed length . This gives the first
non-trivial PRG (with seed length ) for intersections of half-spaces
in the regime where .
(3) There is a randomized -time SAT algorithm for , where In particular, this implies a nontrivial
#SAT algorithm for .
(4) The Minimum Circuit Size Problem is not in .
On the algorithmic side, we show that can be
PAC-learned in time
Pseudorandomness for Approximate Counting and Sampling
We study computational procedures that use both randomness and nondeterminism. The goal of this paper is to derandomize such procedures under the weakest possible assumptions.
Our main technical contribution allows one to “boost” a given hardness assumption: We show that if there is a problem in EXP that cannot be computed by poly-size nondeterministic circuits then there is one which cannot be computed by poly-size circuits that make non-adaptive NP oracle queries. This in particular shows that the various assumptions used over the last few years by several authors to derandomize Arthur-Merlin games (i.e., show AM = NP) are in fact all equivalent.
We also define two new primitives that we regard as the natural pseudorandom objects associated with approximate counting and sampling of NP-witnesses. We use the “boosting” theorem and hashing techniques to construct these primitives using an assumption that is no stronger than that used to derandomize AM.
We observe that Cai's proof that S_2^P ⊆ PP⊆(NP) and the learning algorithm of Bshouty et al. can be seen as reductions to sampling that are not probabilistic. As a consequence they can be derandomized under an assumption which is weaker than the assumption that was previously known to suffice
Quantified Derandomization of Linear Threshold Circuits
One of the prominent current challenges in complexity theory is the attempt
to prove lower bounds for , the class of constant-depth, polynomial-size
circuits with majority gates. Relying on the results of Williams (2013), an
appealing approach to prove such lower bounds is to construct a non-trivial
derandomization algorithm for . In this work we take a first step towards
the latter goal, by proving the first positive results regarding the
derandomization of circuits of depth .
Our first main result is a quantified derandomization algorithm for
circuits with a super-linear number of wires. Specifically, we construct an
algorithm that gets as input a circuit over input bits with
depth and wires, runs in almost-polynomial-time, and
distinguishes between the case that rejects at most inputs
and the case that accepts at most inputs. In fact, our
algorithm works even when the circuit is a linear threshold circuit, rather
than just a circuit (i.e., is a circuit with linear threshold gates,
which are stronger than majority gates).
Our second main result is that even a modest improvement of our quantified
derandomization algorithm would yield a non-trivial algorithm for standard
derandomization of all of , and would consequently imply that
. Specifically, if there exists a quantified
derandomization algorithm that gets as input a circuit with depth
and wires (rather than wires), runs in time at
most , and distinguishes between the case that rejects at
most inputs and the case that accepts at most
inputs, then there exists an algorithm with running time
for standard derandomization of .Comment: Changes in this revision: An additional result (a PRG for quantified
derandomization of depth-2 LTF circuits); rewrite of some of the exposition;
minor correction
- …