Benchmarking Optimization Solvers and Symmetry Breakers for the Automated Deployment of Component-based Applications in the Cloud (EXTENDED ABSTRACT)

Optimization solvers based on methods from constraint programming (OR-Tools, Chuffed, Gecode), optimization modulo theory (Z3), and mathematical programming (CPLEX) are successfully applied nowadays to solve many non-trivial examples. However, for solving the problem of automated deployment in the Cloud of component-based applications, their computational requirements are huge making automatic optimization practically impossible with the current general optimization techniques. To overcome the difficulty, we exploited the sweet spots of the underlying problem in order to identify search space reduction methods. We came up with 15 symmetry breaking strategies which we tested in a static symmetry breaking setting on the solvers enumerated above and on 4 classes of problems. As a result, all symmetry breaking strategies led to significant improvement of the computational time of all solvers, most notably, Z3 performed the best compared to the others. As an observation, the symmetry breaking strategies confirmed that, when applied in a static setting, they may interact badly with the underlying techniques implemented by the solvers.Comment: Presented at 7th International Workshop on Satisfiability Checking and Symbolic Computation (SC-square), Part of IJCAR 22, at FLOC 2022, August 12, 2022, Haifa, Israel. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2006.0540

Mapping Fusion and Synchronized Hyperedge Replacement into Logic Programming

In this paper we compare three different formalisms that can be used in the area of models for distributed, concurrent and mobile systems. In particular we analyze the relationships between a process calculus, the Fusion Calculus, graph transformations in the Synchronized Hyperedge Replacement with Hoare synchronization (HSHR) approach and logic programming. We present a translation from Fusion Calculus into HSHR (whereas Fusion Calculus uses Milner synchronization) and prove a correspondence between the reduction semantics of Fusion Calculus and HSHR transitions. We also present a mapping from HSHR into a transactional version of logic programming and prove that there is a full correspondence between the two formalisms. The resulting mapping from Fusion Calculus to logic programming is interesting since it shows the tight analogies between the two formalisms, in particular for handling name generation and mobility. The intermediate step in terms of HSHR is convenient since graph transformations allow for multiple, remote synchronizations, as required by Fusion Calculus semantics.Comment: 44 pages, 8 figures, to appear in a special issue of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, minor revisio

Enhancing Predicate Pairing with Abstraction for Relational Verification

Relational verification is a technique that aims at proving properties that relate two different program fragments, or two different program runs. It has been shown that constrained Horn clauses (CHCs) can effectively be used for relational verification by applying a CHC transformation, called predicate pairing, which allows the CHC solver to infer relations among arguments of different predicates. In this paper we study how the effects of the predicate pairing transformation can be enhanced by using various abstract domains based on linear arithmetic (i.e., the domain of convex polyhedra and some of its subdomains) during the transformation. After presenting an algorithm for predicate pairing with abstraction, we report on the experiments we have performed on over a hundred relational verification problems by using various abstract domains. The experiments have been performed by using the VeriMAP transformation and verification system, together with the Parma Polyhedra Library (PPL) and the Z3 solver for CHCs.Comment: Pre-proceedings paper presented at the 27th International Symposium on Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR 2017), Namur, Belgium, 10-12 October 2017 (arXiv:1708.07854

Automated Verification of Practical Garbage Collectors

Garbage collectors are notoriously hard to verify, due to their low-level interaction with the underlying system and the general difficulty in reasoning about reachability in graphs. Several papers have presented verified collectors, but either the proofs were hand-written or the collectors were too simplistic to use on practical applications. In this work, we present two mechanically verified garbage collectors, both practical enough to use for real-world C# benchmarks. The collectors and their associated allocators consist of x86 assembly language instructions and macro instructions, annotated with preconditions, postconditions, invariants, and assertions. We used the Boogie verification generator and the Z3 automated theorem prover to verify this assembly language code mechanically. We provide measurements comparing the performance of the verified collector with that of the standard Bartok collectors on off-the-shelf C# benchmarks, demonstrating their competitiveness