Wind speed retrieval from the Gaofen-3 synthetic aperture radar for VV- and HH-polarization using a re-tuned algorithm

In this study, a re-tuned algorithm based on the geophysical model function (GMF) C-SARMOD2 is proposed to retrieve wind speed from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery collected by the Chinese C-band Gaofen-3 (GF-3) SAR. More than 10,000 Vertical-Vertical (VV) and Horizontal-Horizontal (HH) polarization GF-3 images acquired in quad-polarization stripmap (QPS) and wave (WV) modes have been collected during the last three years, in which wind patterns are observed over open seas with incidence angles ranging from 18° to 52°. These images, collocated with wind vectors from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) reanalysis at 0.125° resolution, are used to re-tune the C-SARMOD2 algorithm to specialize it for the GF-3 SAR (CSARMOD-GF). In particular, the CSARMOD-GF performs differently from the C-SARMOD2 at low-to-moderate incidence angles smaller than about 34°. Comparisons with wind speed data from the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), Chinese Haiyang-2B (HY-2B) and buoys from the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) show that the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the retrieved wind speed is approximately 1.8 m/s. Additionally, the CSARMOD-GF algorithm outperforms three state-of-the-art methods – C-SARMOD, C-SARMOD2, and CMOD7 – that, when applied to GF-3 SAR imagery, generating a RMSE of approximately 2.0–2.4 m/s

Validation of sentinel-1A SAR coastal wind speeds against scanning LiDAR

High-accuracy wind data for coastal regions is needed today, e.g., for the assessment of wind resources. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is the only satellite borne sensor that has enough resolution to resolve wind speeds closer than 10 km to shore but the Geophysical Model Functions (GMF) used for SAR wind retrieval are not fully validated here. Ground based scanning light detection and ranging (LiDAR) offer high horizontal resolution wind velocity measurements with high accuracy, also in the coastal zone. This study, for the first time, examines accuracies of SAR wind retrievals at 10 m height with respect to the distance to shore by validation against scanning LiDARs. Comparison of 15 Sentinel-1A wind retrievals using the GMF called C-band model 5.N (CMOD5.N) versus LiDARs show good agreement. It is found, when nondimenionalising with a reference point, that wind speed reductions are between 4% and 8% from 3 km to 1 km from shore. Findings indicate that SAR wind retrievals give reliable wind speed measurements as close as 1 km to the shore. Comparisons of SAR winds versus two different LiDAR configurations yield root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.31 ms − 1 and 1.42 ms − 1 for spatially averaged wind speeds