Regular realizability problems and context-free languages

We investigate regular realizability (RR) problems, which are the problems of verifying whether intersection of a regular language -- the input of the problem -- and fixed language called filter is non-empty. In this paper we focus on the case of context-free filters. Algorithmic complexity of the RR problem is a very coarse measure of context-free languages complexity. This characteristic is compatible with rational dominance. We present examples of P-complete RR problems as well as examples of RR problems in the class NL. Also we discuss RR problems with context-free filters that might have intermediate complexity. Possible candidates are the languages with polynomially bounded rational indices.Comment: conference DCFS 201

Tight polynomial worst-case bounds for loop programs

In 2008, Ben-Amram, Jones and Kristiansen showed that for a simple programming language - representing non-deterministic imperative programs with bounded loops, and arithmetics limited to addition and multiplication - it is possible to decide precisely whether a program has certain growth-rate properties, in particular whether a computed value, or the program's running time, has a polynomial growth rate. A natural and intriguing problem was to move from answering the decision problem to giving a quantitative result, namely, a tight polynomial upper bound. This paper shows how to obtain asymptotically-tight, multivariate, disjunctive polynomial bounds for this class of programs. This is a complete solution: whenever a polynomial bound exists it will be found. A pleasant surprise is that the algorithm is quite simple; but it relies on some subtle reasoning. An important ingredient in the proof is the forest factorization theorem, a strong structural result on homomorphisms into a finite monoid

Realizability and uniqueness in graphs

AbstractConsider a finite graph G(V,E). Let us associate to G a finite list P(G) of invariants. To any P the following two natural problems arise: (R) Realizability. Given P, when is P=P(G) for some graph G?, (U) Uniqueness. Suppose P(G)=P(H) for graphs G and H. When does this imply G ≅ H? The best studied questions in this context are the degree realization problem for (R) and the reconstruction conjecture for (U). We discuss the problems (R) and (U) for the degree sequence and the size sequence of induced subgraphs for undirected and directed graphs, concentrating on the complexity of the corresponding decision problems and their connection to a natural search problem on graphs

Quantitative Models and Implicit Complexity

We give new proofs of soundness (all representable functions on base types lies in certain complexity classes) for Elementary Affine Logic, LFPL (a language for polytime computation close to realistic functional programming introduced by one of us), Light Affine Logic and Soft Affine Logic. The proofs are based on a common semantical framework which is merely instantiated in four different ways. The framework consists of an innovative modification of realizability which allows us to use resource-bounded computations as realisers as opposed to including all Turing computable functions as is usually the case in realizability constructions. For example, all realisers in the model for LFPL are polynomially bounded computations whence soundness holds by construction of the model. The work then lies in being able to interpret all the required constructs in the model. While being the first entirely semantical proof of polytime soundness for light logi cs, our proof also provides a notable simplification of the original already semantical proof of polytime soundness for LFPL. A new result made possible by the semantic framework is the addition of polymorphism and a modality to LFPL thus allowing for an internal definition of inductive datatypes.Comment: 29 page

Tight Polynomial Worst-Case Bounds for Loop Programs

In 2008, Ben-Amram, Jones and Kristiansen showed that for a simple programming language - representing non-deterministic imperative programs with bounded loops, and arithmetics limited to addition and multiplication - it is possible to decide precisely whether a program has certain growth-rate properties, in particular whether a computed value, or the program's running time, has a polynomial growth rate. A natural and intriguing problem was to move from answering the decision problem to giving a quantitative result, namely, a tight polynomial upper bound. This paper shows how to obtain asymptotically-tight, multivariate, disjunctive polynomial bounds for this class of programs. This is a complete solution: whenever a polynomial bound exists it will be found. A pleasant surprise is that the algorithm is quite simple; but it relies on some subtle reasoning. An important ingredient in the proof is the forest factorization theorem, a strong structural result on homomorphisms into a finite monoid

Provably total recursive functions and MRDP theorem in Basic Arithmetic and its extensions

We study Basic Arithmetic, BA introduced by W. Ruitenburg. BA is an arithmetical theory based on basic logic which is weaker than intuitionistic logic. We show that the class of the provably recursive functions of BA is a proper sub-class of primitive recursive functions. Three extensions of BA, called BA+U, BA_c and EBA are investigated with relation to their provably recursive functions. It is shown that the provably recursive functions of these three extensions of BA are exactly primitive recursive functions. Moreover, among other things, it is shown that the well-known MRDP theorem doesn't hold in BA, BA+U, BA_c, but holds in EBA