19 research outputs found

    Sparsest Cut on Bounded Treewidth Graphs: Algorithms and Hardness Results

    Full text link
    We give a 2-approximation algorithm for Non-Uniform Sparsest Cut that runs in time nO(k)n^{O(k)}, where kk is the treewidth of the graph. This improves on the previous 22k2^{2^k}-approximation in time \poly(n) 2^{O(k)} due to Chlamt\'a\v{c} et al. To complement this algorithm, we show the following hardness results: If the Non-Uniform Sparsest Cut problem has a ρ\rho-approximation for series-parallel graphs (where ρ1\rho \geq 1), then the Max Cut problem has an algorithm with approximation factor arbitrarily close to 1/ρ1/\rho. Hence, even for such restricted graphs (which have treewidth 2), the Sparsest Cut problem is NP-hard to approximate better than 17/16ϵ17/16 - \epsilon for ϵ>0\epsilon > 0; assuming the Unique Games Conjecture the hardness becomes 1/αGWϵ1/\alpha_{GW} - \epsilon. For graphs with large (but constant) treewidth, we show a hardness result of 2ϵ2 - \epsilon assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. Our algorithm rounds a linear program based on (a subset of) the Sherali-Adams lift of the standard Sparsest Cut LP. We show that even for treewidth-2 graphs, the LP has an integrality gap close to 2 even after polynomially many rounds of Sherali-Adams. Hence our approach cannot be improved even on such restricted graphs without using a stronger relaxation

    Fixed-parameter tractability of multicut parameterized by the size of the cutset

    Get PDF
    Given an undirected graph GG, a collection {(s1,t1),...,(sk,tk)}\{(s_1,t_1),..., (s_k,t_k)\} of pairs of vertices, and an integer pp, the Edge Multicut problem ask if there is a set SS of at most pp edges such that the removal of SS disconnects every sis_i from the corresponding tit_i. Vertex Multicut is the analogous problem where SS is a set of at most pp vertices. Our main result is that both problems can be solved in time 2O(p3)...nO(1)2^{O(p^3)}... n^{O(1)}, i.e., fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the size pp of the cutset in the solution. By contrast, it is unlikely that an algorithm with running time of the form f(p)...nO(1)f(p)... n^{O(1)} exists for the directed version of the problem, as we show it to be W[1]-hard parameterized by the size of the cutset
    corecore