3 research outputs found
Pixel and Voxel Representations of Graphs
We study contact representations for graphs, which we call pixel
representations in 2D and voxel representations in 3D. Our representations are
based on the unit square grid whose cells we call pixels in 2D and voxels in
3D. Two pixels are adjacent if they share an edge, two voxels if they share a
face. We call a connected set of pixels or voxels a blob. Given a graph, we
represent its vertices by disjoint blobs such that two blobs contain adjacent
pixels or voxels if and only if the corresponding vertices are adjacent. We are
interested in the size of a representation, which is the number of pixels or
voxels it consists of.
We first show that finding minimum-size representations is NP-complete. Then,
we bound representation sizes needed for certain graph classes. In 2D, we show
that, for -outerplanar graphs with vertices, pixels are
always sufficient and sometimes necessary. In particular, outerplanar graphs
can be represented with a linear number of pixels, whereas general planar
graphs sometimes need a quadratic number. In 3D, voxels are
always sufficient and sometimes necessary for any -vertex graph. We improve
this bound to for graphs of treewidth and to
for graphs of genus . In particular, planar graphs
admit representations with voxels
EPG-representations with small grid-size
In an EPG-representation of a graph each vertex is represented by a path
in the rectangular grid, and is an edge in if and only if the paths
representing an share a grid-edge. Requiring paths representing edges
to be x-monotone or, even stronger, both x- and y-monotone gives rise to three
natural variants of EPG-representations, one where edges have no monotonicity
requirements and two with the aforementioned monotonicity requirements. The
focus of this paper is understanding how small a grid can be achieved for such
EPG-representations with respect to various graph parameters.
We show that there are -edge graphs that require a grid of area
in any variant of EPG-representations. Similarly there are
pathwidth- graphs that require height and area in
any variant of EPG-representations. We prove a matching upper bound of
area for all pathwidth- graphs in the strongest model, the one where edges
are required to be both x- and y-monotone. Thus in this strongest model, the
result implies, for example, , and area bounds
for bounded pathwidth graphs, bounded treewidth graphs and all classes of
graphs that exclude a fixed minor, respectively. For the model with no
restrictions on the monotonicity of the edges, stronger results can be achieved
for some graph classes, for example an area bound for bounded treewidth
graphs and bound for graphs of bounded genus.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
New Approaches to Classic Graph-Embedding Problems - Orthogonal Drawings & Constrained Planarity
Drawings of graphs are often used to represent a given data set in a human-readable way. In this thesis, we consider different classic algorithmic problems that arise when automatically generating graph drawings. More specifically, we solve some open problems in the context of orthogonal drawings and advance the current state of research on the problems clustered planarity and simultaneous planarity