Performance analysis of Handwritten Devnagari Character Recognition using Feed Forward , Radial Basis , Elman Back Propagation, and Pattern Recognition Neural Network Model Using Different Feature Extraction Methods

This paper describes the performance analysis for the four types of neural network with different feature extraction methods for character recognition of hand written devnagari alphabets. We have implemented four types of networks i.e. Feed forward , Radial basis, Elman back propagation and Pattern recognition neural network using three different types of feature extraction methods i.e. pixel value, histogram and blocks mean for each network. These algorithms have been performed better than the conventional approaches of neural network for pattern recognition. It has been analyzed that the Radial Basis neural network performs better compared to other types of networks

A new hybrid convolutional neural network and eXtreme gradient boosting classifier for recognizing handwritten Ethiopian characters

Handwritten character recognition has been profoundly studied for many years in the field of pattern recognition. Due to its vast practical applications and financial implications, handwritten character recognition is still an important research area. In this research, the Handwritten Ethiopian Character Recognition (HECR) dataset has been prepared to train the model. The images in the HECR dataset were organized with more than one color pen RGB main spaces that have been size normalized to 28 × 28 pixels. The dataset is a combination of scripts (Fidel in Ethiopia), numerical representations, punctuations, tonal symbols, combining symbols, and special characters. These scripts have been used to write ancient histories, science, and arts of Ethiopia and Eritrea. In this study, a hybrid model of two super classifiers: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) is proposed for classification. In this integrated model, CNN works as a trainable automatic feature extractor from the raw images and XGBoost takes the extracted features as an input for recognition and classification. The output error rates of the hybrid model and CNN with a fully connected layer are compared. A 0.4630 and 0.1612 error rates are achieved in classifying the handwritten testing dataset images, respectively. Thus XGBoost as a classifier performs a better result than the traditional fully connected layer