5 research outputs found

    Shared Memory Architecture for Simulating Sediment-Fluid Flow by OpenMP

    Get PDF
    Simulation of fluid flow using Shallow water equations (SWE) and sediment movement below it using Exner equation is given. Both of the equations will be combined using splitting technique, in which SWE would be computed using Harten-Lax-van Leer and Einfeldt (HLLE) numerical flux, then Exner would be computed semi-implicitly. This paper elaborates the steps of constructing SWE-Exner model. To show the agreement of the scheme, two problems will be elaborated: (1) comparison between analytical solution and numerical solution, and (2) parallelism using OpenMP for Transcritical over a granular bump. The first problem is going to tell the discrete L1L^{1}-, L2L^{2}-, and L∞L^{\infty}-norm error of the scheme, and the second one will show the simulation result, speedup, and efficiency of the scheme, which is around 56.44%56.44\%

    Shared Memory Architecture for Simulating Sediment-Fluid Flow by OpenMP

    Get PDF
    Simulation of fluid flow using Shallow water equations (SWE) and sediment movement below it using Exner equation is given. Both of the equations will be combined using splitting technique, in which SWE would be computed using Harten-Lax-van Leer and Einfeldt (HLLE) numerical flux, then Exner would be computed semi-implicitly. This paper elaborates the steps of constructing SWE-Exner model. To show the agreement of the scheme, two problems will be elaborated: (1) comparison between analytical solution and numerical solution, and (2) parallelism using OpenMP for Transcritical over a granular bump. The first problem is going to tell the discrete L1L^{1}-, L2L^{2}-, and L∞L^{\infty}-norm error of the scheme, and the second one will show the simulation result, speedup, and efficiency of the scheme, which is around 56.44%56.44\%

    An OpenMP Compiler Benchmark

    Get PDF

    Performance comparisons of basic openMP constructs

    No full text
    OpenMP has become the de-facto standard for shared memory parallel programming. The directive based nature of OpenMP allows incremental and portable developement of parallel application for a wide range of platforms. The fact that OpenMP is easy to use implies that a lot of details are hidden from the end user. Therefore, basic factors like the runtime system, compiler optimizations and other implementation specific issues can have a significant impact on the performance of an OpenMP application. Frequently, OpenMP constructs can have widely varying performance on different operating platforms and even with different compilers on the same machine. This makes it very important to have a comparative study of the low-level performance of individual OpenMP constructs. In this paper, we present an enhanced set of microbenchmarks for OpenMP derived from the EPCC benchmarks and based on the SKaMPI benchmarking framework. We describe the methodology of evaluation followed by details of some of the constructs and their performance measurement. Results from experiments conducted on the IBM SP3 and the SUN SunFire systems are presented for each construct
    corecore