3,899 research outputs found

    Fuzzy based load and energy aware multipath routing for mobile ad hoc networks

    Get PDF
    Routing is a challenging task in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) due to their dynamic topology and lack of central administration. As a consequence of un-predictable topology changes of such networks, routing protocols employed need to accurately capture the delay, load, available bandwidth and residual node energy at various locations of the network for effective energy and load balancing. This paper presents a fuzzy logic based scheme that ensures delay, load and energy aware routing to avoid congestion and minimise end-to-end delay in MANETs. In the proposed approach, forwarding delay, average load, available bandwidth and residual battery energy at a mobile node are given as inputs to a fuzzy inference engine to determine the traffic distribution possibility from that node based on the given fuzzy rules. Based on the output from the fuzzy system, traffic is distributed over fail-safe multiple routes to reduce the load at a congested node. Through simulation results, we show that our approach reduces end-to-end delay, packet drop and average energy consumption and increases packet delivery ratio for constant bit rate (CBR) traffic when compared with the popular Ad hoc On-demand Multipath Distance Vector (AOMDV) routing protocol

    A Review of the Energy Efficient and Secure Multicast Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad hoc Networks

    Full text link
    This paper presents a thorough survey of recent work addressing energy efficient multicast routing protocols and secure multicast routing protocols in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs). There are so many issues and solutions which witness the need of energy management and security in ad hoc wireless networks. The objective of a multicast routing protocol for MANETs is to support the propagation of data from a sender to all the receivers of a multicast group while trying to use the available bandwidth efficiently in the presence of frequent topology changes. Multicasting can improve the efficiency of the wireless link when sending multiple copies of messages by exploiting the inherent broadcast property of wireless transmission. Secure multicast routing plays a significant role in MANETs. However, offering energy efficient and secure multicast routing is a difficult and challenging task. In recent years, various multicast routing protocols have been proposed for MANETs. These protocols have distinguishing features and use different mechanismsComment: 15 page

    Load Balancing in MANET: Alleviating the center node

    Get PDF
    Load balancing is an essential requirement of any multi-hop wireless network. A wireless routing protocol is accessed on its ability to distribute traffic over the network nodes and a good routing protocol achieves this without introducing un- acceptable delay. The most obvious benefitt is manifested in increasing the life of a battery operated node which can eventually increase the longevity of the en- tire network. In the endeavor of finding the shortest distance between any two nodes to transmit data fast the center nodes become the famous picks. The centrally located nodes connect many sub networks and serve as gateways to some sub networks that become partitioned from the rest of the network in its absence. Thus, the lifetime of the center nodes become a bottleneck for connectivity of a sub network prior to its partition from the rest of the network. An unbiased load can cause congestion in the network which impacts the overall throughput, packet delivery ratio and the average end to end delay. In, this thesis we have mitigated the unbiased load distribution on centrally located nodes by pushing traffic further to the peripheral nodes without compromising the average end to end delay for a greater network longevity and performances. We proposed a novel routing metric , load and a minimization criterion to decide a path that involves nodes with less load burden on them. The simulations of the proposed mechanism run on NS-2.34 for 16 and 50 nodes have revealed an average 2.26% reduction of load on the center node in comparison with AOMDV. . .
    corecore