337 research outputs found
A Dirac type result on Hamilton cycles in oriented graphs
We show that for each \alpha>0 every sufficiently large oriented graph G with
\delta^+(G),\delta^-(G)\ge 3|G|/8+ \alpha |G| contains a Hamilton cycle. This
gives an approximate solution to a problem of Thomassen. In fact, we prove the
stronger result that G is still Hamiltonian if
\delta(G)+\delta^+(G)+\delta^-(G)\geq 3|G|/2 + \alpha |G|. Up to the term
\alpha |G| this confirms a conjecture of H\"aggkvist. We also prove an Ore-type
theorem for oriented graphs.Comment: Added an Ore-type resul
Adjacency labeling schemes and induced-universal graphs
We describe a way of assigning labels to the vertices of any undirected graph
on up to vertices, each composed of bits, such that given the
labels of two vertices, and no other information regarding the graph, it is
possible to decide whether or not the vertices are adjacent in the graph. This
is optimal, up to an additive constant, and constitutes the first improvement
in almost 50 years of an bound of Moon. As a consequence, we
obtain an induced-universal graph for -vertex graphs containing only
vertices, which is optimal up to a multiplicative constant,
solving an open problem of Vizing from 1968. We obtain similar tight results
for directed graphs, tournaments and bipartite graphs
Embedding large subgraphs into dense graphs
What conditions ensure that a graph G contains some given spanning subgraph
H? The most famous examples of results of this kind are probably Dirac's
theorem on Hamilton cycles and Tutte's theorem on perfect matchings. Perfect
matchings are generalized by perfect F-packings, where instead of covering all
the vertices of G by disjoint edges, we want to cover G by disjoint copies of a
(small) graph F. It is unlikely that there is a characterization of all graphs
G which contain a perfect F-packing, so as in the case of Dirac's theorem it
makes sense to study conditions on the minimum degree of G which guarantee a
perfect F-packing.
The Regularity lemma of Szemeredi and the Blow-up lemma of Komlos, Sarkozy
and Szemeredi have proved to be powerful tools in attacking such problems and
quite recently, several long-standing problems and conjectures in the area have
been solved using these. In this survey, we give an outline of recent progress
(with our main emphasis on F-packings, Hamiltonicity problems and tree
embeddings) and describe some of the methods involved
Hamilton decompositions of regular expanders: a proof of Kelly's conjecture for large tournaments
A long-standing conjecture of Kelly states that every regular tournament on n
vertices can be decomposed into (n-1)/2 edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. We prove
this conjecture for large n. In fact, we prove a far more general result, based
on our recent concept of robust expansion and a new method for decomposing
graphs. We show that every sufficiently large regular digraph G on n vertices
whose degree is linear in n and which is a robust outexpander has a
decomposition into edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. This enables us to obtain
numerous further results, e.g. as a special case we confirm a conjecture of
Erdos on packing Hamilton cycles in random tournaments. As corollaries to the
main result, we also obtain several results on packing Hamilton cycles in
undirected graphs, giving e.g. the best known result on a conjecture of
Nash-Williams. We also apply our result to solve a problem on the domination
ratio of the Asymmetric Travelling Salesman problem, which was raised e.g. by
Glover and Punnen as well as Alon, Gutin and Krivelevich.Comment: new version includes a standalone version of the `robust
decomposition lemma' for application in subsequent paper
- …