The spy saw a cop with a telescope: Who has the telescope? An attempt to understand the basic building blocks of ambiguous PP-attachment sequences

This paper explores the problem of ambiguous PP-attachment by extracting information from a PP-attachment corpus using Python. Cases of ambiguous PP-attachment involve sequences of the head words of the following type: verb > noun > preposition > noun. The head nouns of ambiguous PP-attachment sentences, as well as aspects beyond head words, are investigated by testing a number of hypotheses using a corpus of thousands of real-world examples. The hypotheses are partially based on theory and partially on empirical evidence. The results support some theoretical claims while discarding others. For instance, one finding that supports an existing claim is that of-PPs always attach to NPs whose heads are classifiers. This kind of knowledge can be put into practice when parsing natural language.This paper explores the problem of ambiguous PP-attachment by extracting information from a PP-attachment corpus using Python. Cases of ambiguous PP-attachment involve sequences of the head words of the following type: verb > noun > preposition > noun. The head nouns of ambiguous PP-attachment sentences, as well as aspects beyond head words, are investigated by testing a number of hypotheses using a corpus of thousands of real-world examples. The hypotheses are partially based on theory and partially on empirical evidence. The results support some theoretical claims while discarding others. For instance, one finding that supports an existing claim is that of-PPs always attach to NPs whose heads are classifiers. This kind of knowledge can be put into practice when parsing natural language

Looking Beyond the Canonical Formulation and Evaluation Paradigm of Prepositional Phrase Attachment

Prepositional phrase attachment has long been considered one of the most difficult tasks in automated syntactic parsing of natural language text. In this thesis, we examine several aspects of what has become the dominant view of PP attachment in natural language processing with an eye toward extending this view to a more realistic account of the problem. In particular, we take issue with the manner in which most PP attachment work is evaluated, and the degree to which traditional assumptions and simplifications no longer allow for realistically meaningful assessments. We also argue for looking beyond the canonical subset of attachment problems, where almost all attention has been focused, toward a fuller view of the task, both in terms of the types of ambiguities addressed and the contextual information considered