8,300 research outputs found

    Implementing screening and brief Interventions for excessive alcohol consumption in primary health care

    Get PDF
    O consumo de bebidas alcoólicas é um dos principais fatores de risco da morbilidade e mortalidade prematura a nível mundial. As pessoas que consomem este género de bebidas têm um risco aumentado de vir a desenvolver mais de 200 problemas de saúde diferentes. A maioria do impacto do consumo de álcool na saúde humana é determinado por duas dimensões: o volume total de álcool consumido e o padrão de consumo. Existem várias medidas com comprovada eficácia que podem ser empregues para reduzir o risco associado ao consumo de álcool, entre as quais se encontra a deteção precoce e intervenção breve ao nível dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários. A maioria dos profissionais de saúde neste nível de cuidados considera o consumo de álcool como um importante problema de saúde e manifesta o seu apoio a medidas que visem reduzir o seu impacto. No entanto, poucos são os profissionais dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários que de forma sistemática identificam e aconselham os seus doentes relativamente aos seus hábitos etílicos. Como tal, o objetivo geral desta tese foi investigar como implementar a deteção precoce e intervenção breve no consumo excessivo de álcool nos Cuidados de Saúde Primários. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática das barreiras e facilitadores à implementação da deteção precoce e intervenção breve no consumo excessivo de álcool nos Cuidados de Saúde Primários. As barreiras e facilitadores identificados nesta revisão foram analisados à luz da teoria de modificação comportamental para compreender a ligação destes fatores aos determinantes da mudança de comportamento, e para identificar as estratégias conceptualmente mais eficazes para abordar as barreiras e facilitadores à mudança de comportamento dos profissionais dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários no sentido de aumentar as taxas de deteção precoce e intervenção breve no consumo excessivo de álcool. Esta metodologia foi utilizada para desenhar um programa de implementação com base em pressupostos teóricos que foi testado num estudo experimental randomizado e controlado em clusters. Esta tese identificou diversas barreiras à implementação, ligadas a todos os domínios teóricos da mudança comportamental. As barreiras mais frequentemente mencionadas pelos profissionais foram: preocupação sobre as suas competências e eficácia para realizar a deteção precoce e intervenção breve; falta de conhecimento específico sobre o consumo de álcool; falta de tempo; falta de materiais; falta de apoio; e atitudes para com o doente com consumos excessivos de álcool. Esta tese mostrou também a existência de dois grupos distintos de médicos de família com base nas suas atitudes para com estes doentes, um com atitudes mais positivas, o outro com atitudes mais negativas. Esta tese mostrou ainda que um programa de implementação da deteção precoce e intervenção breve, desenhado com base em pressupostos teóricos de modificação comportamental, adaptado às barreiras e facilitadores da implementação, aumenta de forma significativa as taxas de identificação precoce dos consumos de álcool. Esta tese contribui para aumentar o conhecimento atual no sentido em que põe à disposição dos investigadores evidência prática sobre como abordar os fatores com influência na implementação da identificação precoce e intervenção breve para o consumo de álcool ao nível dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários. Esta tese contribui também para um melhor entendimento dos mecanismos subjacentes à resistência e à mudança de comportamento dos profissionais dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários no que respeita à implementação da deteção precoce e intervenção breve do consumo de álcool. Os resultados desta tese poderão ser usados por investigadores e decisores políticos para desenhar novos programas de implementação tendo como objetivo modificar esta prática clínica ao nível dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários.Alcohol use is among the leading risk factors for the global burden of disease and premature death. People who drink alcoholic beverages are at risk of developing more than 200 diseases and injury conditions. Most of the impact of alcohol consumption on human health and well-being is determined by two dimensions of drinking: the total volume of alcohol consumed and the pattern of drinking. Several effective strategies exist to reduce the harmful use of alcohol, which includes screening and brief interventions for excessive alcohol use in primary health care. The majority of primary health care providers agree that the excessive consumption of alcohol is an important health issue and express their support to policies for reducing the impact of alcohol on the health of their patients. Notwithstanding, implementation of screening and brief interventions is low at the primary health care level. Therefore, the overall aim of this thesis is to investigate how to implement screening and brief interventions for excessive alcohol consumption in primary health care. This thesis reviewed the barriers of, and facilitators for, the implementation of alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary health care. Behaviour change theory was used to understand how these factors linked to the determinants of behaviour change and how they could be addressed in order to change primary health care providers’ behaviour, i.e. to increase the delivery of alcohol screening and brief interventions. A comprehensive theory-based implementation programme was designed and tested in a cluster randomized controlled trial. This thesis identified several barriers to implementation which were mapped to all the theoretical domains of behaviour change. Primary health care providers concerns about their ability to deliver alcohol screening and brief interventions and to help patients to cut down, lack of alcohol-related knowledge, lack of time, lack of materials and support, and providers’ attitudes towards at-risk drinkers were among the most commonly cited barriers. This thesis found evidence that the attitudes of family physicians could be used to divide practitioners into two distinct groups, one with more positive and the other with more negative attitudes towards at-risk drinkers. This thesis also found that a behaviour change theory-based programme, tailored to the barriers for, and facilitators of, the implementation of screening and brief intervention in primary health care is effective in increasing alcohol screening rates. This thesis contributed to the evidence base by providing researchers with practical evidence on how to address the factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions in primary health care. This thesis also provides researchers with insight into the behavioural mechanisms mediating primary health care providers’ decision to deliver alcohol screening and brief interventions. The results of this thesis could be used by researchers and policymakers to inform the design of novel theory-oriented interventions to support the implementation of alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary health care

    Pregnancy and cardiac disease

    Get PDF

    A toolbox for a structured risk-based prehabilitation program in major surgical oncology

    Get PDF
    Prehabilitation is a multimodal concept to improve functional capability prior to surgery, so that the patients’ resilience is strengthened to withstand any peri- and postoperative comorbidity. It covers physical activities, nutrition, and psychosocial wellbeing. The literature is heterogeneous in outcomes and definitions. In this scoping review, class 1 and 2 evidence was included to identify seven main aspects of prehabilitation for the treatment pathway: (i) risk assessment, (ii) FITT (frequency, interventions, time, type of exercise) principles of prehabilitation exercise, (iii) outcome measures, (iv) nutrition, (v) patient blood management, (vi) mental wellbeing, and (vii) economic potential. Recommendations include the risk of tumor progression due to delay of surgery. Patients undergoing prehabilitation should perceive risk assessment by structured, quantifiable, and validated tools like Risk Analysis Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiology Score, or Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group scoring. Assessments should be repeated to quantify its effects. The most common types of exercise include breathing exercises and moderate- to high-intensity interval protocols. The program should have a duration of 3–6 weeks with 3–4 exercises per week that take 30–60 min. The 6-Minute Walking Testing is a valid and resource-saving tool to assess changes in aerobic capacity. Long-term assessment should include standardized outcome measurements (overall survival, 90-day survival, Dindo–Clavien/CCI®) to monitor the potential of up to 50% less morbidity. Finally, individual cost-revenue assessment can help assess health economics, confirming the hypothetic saving of 8fortreatmentfor8 for treatment for 1 spent for prehabilitation. These recommendations should serve as a toolbox to generate hypotheses, discussion, and systematic approaches to develop clinical prehabilitation standards

    A case study of an individual participant data meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed that prediction regions represented heterogeneity well

    Get PDF
    The diagnostic accuracy of a screening tool is often characterized by its sensitivity and specificity. An analysis of these measures must consider their intrinsic correlation. In the context of an individual participant data meta-analysis, heterogeneity is one of the main components of the analysis. When using a random-effects meta-analytic model, prediction regions provide deeper insight into the effect of heterogeneity on the variability of estimated accuracy measures across the entire studied population, not just the average. This study aimed to investigate heterogeneity via prediction regions in an individual participant data meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression. From the total number of studies in the pool, four dates were selected containing roughly 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the total number of participants. A bivariate random-effects model was fitted to studies up to and including each of these dates to jointly estimate sensitivity and specificity. Two-dimensional prediction regions were plotted in ROC-space. Subgroup analyses were carried out on sex and age, regardless of the date of the study. The dataset comprised 17,436 participants from 58 primary studies of which 2322 (13.3%) presented cases of major depression. Point estimates of sensitivity and specificity did not differ importantly as more studies were added to the model. However, correlation of the measures increased. As expected, standard errors of the logit pooled TPR and FPR consistently decreased as more studies were used, while standard deviations of the random-effects did not decrease monotonically. Subgroup analysis by sex did not reveal important contributions for observed heterogeneity; however, the shape of the prediction regions differed. Subgroup analysis by age did not reveal meaningful contributions to the heterogeneity and the prediction regions were similar in shape. Prediction intervals and regions reveal previously unseen trends in a dataset. In the context of a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, prediction regions can display the range of accuracy measures in different populations and settings

    Living with erythropoietic protoporphyria:Bridging the gap between research and clinical practice

    Get PDF

    Southern Adventist University Undergraduate Catalog 2022-2023

    Get PDF
    Southern Adventist University\u27s undergraduate catalog for the academic year 2022-2023.https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/undergrad_catalog/1121/thumbnail.jp

    A standardised protocol for assessment of relative SARS-CoV-2 variant severity, with application to severity risk for COVID-19 cases infected with Omicron BA.1 compared to Delta variants in six European countries

    Full text link
    Several SARS-CoV-2 variants that evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic have appeared to differ in severity, based on analyses of single-country datasets. With decreased SARS-CoV-2 testing and sequencing, international collaborative studies will become increasingly important for timely assessment of the severity of newly emerged variants. The Joint WHO Regional Office for Europe and ECDC Infection Severity Working Group was formed to produce and pilot a standardised study protocol to estimate relative variant case-severity in settings with individual-level SARS-CoV-2 testing and COVID-19 outcome data during periods when two variants were co-circulating. To assess feasibility, the study protocol and its associated statistical analysis code was applied by local investigators in Denmark, England, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal and Scotland to assess the case-severity of Omicron BA.1 relative to Delta cases. After pooling estimates using meta-analysis methods (random effects estimates), the risk of hospital admission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.54), ICU admission (aHR=0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.27), and death (aHR=0.31, 95% CI 0.28-0.35) was lower for Omicron BA.1 compared to Delta cases. The aHRs varied by age group and vaccination status. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated the feasibility of conducting variant severity analyses in a multinational collaborative framework. The results add further evidence for the reduced severity of the Omicron BA.1 variant.Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures (excluding supplementary material

    How is suicide risk assessed in healthcare settings in the UK? A systematic scoping review

    Get PDF
    A high proportion of people contact healthcare services in the 12 months prior to death by suicide. Identifying people at high-risk for suicide is therefore a key concern for healthcare services. Whilst there is extensive research on the validity and reliability of suicide risk assessment tools, there remains a lack of understanding of how suicide risk assessments are conducted by healthcare staff in practice. This scoping review examined the literature on how suicide risk assessments are conducted and experienced by healthcare practitioners, patients, carers, relatives, and friends of people who have died by suicide in the UK. Literature searches were conducted on key databases using a pre-defined search strategy pre-registered with the Open Science Framework and following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Eligible for inclusion were original research, written in English, exploring how suicide risk is assessed in the UK, related to administering or undergoing risk assessment for suicide, key concepts relating to those experiences, or directly exploring the experiences of administering or undergoing assessment. Eighteen studies were included in the final sample. Information was charted including study setting and design, sampling strategy, sample characteristics, and findings. A narrative account of the literature is provided. There was considerable variation regarding how suicide risk assessments are conducted in practice. There was evidence of a lack of risk assessment training, low awareness of suicide prevention guidance, and a lack of evidence relating to patient perspectives of suicide risk assessments. Increased inclusion of patient perspectives of suicide risk assessment is needed to gain understanding of how the process can be improved. Limited time and difficulty in starting an open discussion about suicide with patients were noted as barriers to successful assessment. Implications for practice are discussed

    Tobacco: preventing uptake, promoting quitting and treating dependence.

    Get PDF
    corecore