Outcome calculations based on nursing documentation in the first generation of electronic health records in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies regarding nursing documentation focused primarily on documentation quality, for instance, in terms of the accuracy of the documentation. The combination between accuracy measurements and the quality and frequencies of outcome variables such as the length of the hospital stay were only minimally addressed. METHOD: An audit of 300 randomly selected digital nursing records of patients (age of >70 years) admitted between 2013-2014 for hip surgery in two orthopaedic wards of a general Dutch hospital was conducted. RESULTS: Nursing diagnoses: Impaired tissue perfusion (wound), Pressure ulcer, and Deficient fluid volume had significant influence on the length of the hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Nursing process documentation can be used for outcome calculations. Nevertheless, in the first generation of electronic health records, nursing diagnoses were not documented in a standardized manner (First generation 2010-2015; the first generation of electronic records implemented in clinical practice in the Netherlands)

The implementation of electronic records related to the nursing process: integrative review / A implementação dos registros eletrônicos relacionados ao processo de enfermagem: revisão integrativa

Objetivo O estudo objetivou identificar quais estratégias estão sendo utilizadas na implementação de registros eletrônicos relacionados ao processo de enfermagem, nas bases de dados: PubMed, Scopus e Web of Science. Métodos Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa na qual os descritores utilizados foram electronic healthrecords e nursing process. Resultados Os dados encontrados indicam que os estudos em sua maioria foram pesquisas quantitativas, publicadas no periódico Nursing informatics (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics) desenvolvidas em universidades e no continente americano. Conclusões Os dados apontam que a maior parte das pesquisas são referentes a usabilidade do registro eletrônico em saúde. Outros aspectos abordados foram as fragilidades e perspectivas associados ao uso do registro eletrônico, bem como o processo de enfermagem em sistemas informatizados

Nurse Practitioner Impact on Quantitative Patient Outcomes in Four Healthcare Settings' System Context: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are frequently integrated into interprofessional teams to improve quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery, especially in complex systems. Research on the NP role has grown dramatically, yet an aggregate analysis had never been performed. The purpose of this review was to systematically describe the nature and impact of NP interventions in healthcare settings, to establish a comprehensive understanding of NPs with respect to healthcare delivery, including discovery of information gaps. The specific objectives of the study were to describe the types of: 1) intervention activities that NPs have performed in randomised controlled trials (RCTs); 2) quantitative study endpoints measured in RCTs; and 3) impact of NPs on all quantitative patient outcomes in four settings: primary health care, long term care, outpatient care, and acute care, conducting meta-analysis where possible. Eligible studies included low risk of bias RCTs that tested NP interventions on quantitative endpoints in healthcare settings; data sources included peer reviewed or grey literature in English, from the year 2000 forth. The literature search performed by a professional librarian (MH) yielded 1,188 unique citations. Screening for relevance and risk of bias by two independent reviewers (LT and NL) resulted in a set of included studies comprised of 39 articles (29 different RCTs). Data extraction by LT was cross-checked by the second independent reviewer NL. Findings were systematically summarized according to pre-specified protocol. Out of 89 classes of endpoint-outcomes, results for 43 patient outcome classes (43/89; 48%) were statistically significant, associated with 26/29 (90%) interventions. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the proportion of hospitalizations between intervention and control groups of two homogenous studies, systematically completing the review’s data analysis. Transparent data presentation within an explicit, reproducible methodology minimizes bias, resulting in reliable findings that were organized, synthesized and summarized in a clear and comprehensive fashion. To the extent of its findings, this systematic review may support improvements in access to quality healthcare, and may provide insight into long term strategies that have potential to contribute toward enhanced balance within the healthcare continuum, from delivery of preventive primary health care services to treatment in acute care

Improving the Use of Electronic Medical Records in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Electronic Medical Records were first introduced in the 1970s to organize patient information, improve coordination of care, and improve communication. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify interventions aimed at improving EMR use in primary health care settings. Of 2,098 identified studies twelve were included in the review. Results showed that interventions focused on the use of EMR functions were five times more likely to show improvements in EMR use compared to controls. Interventions focused on data quality were five and a half times more likely to show improvements in EMR use compared to controls. Individuals in primary health care settings aiming to improve EMR use would benefit from implementing interventions focused on EMR feature add-ons, and provisions of educational materials, or financial incentives targeted at improving the use of EMR functions and data quality

A comprehensive evaluation of outcomes from patient handling interventions

Assisting less able people to move in a healthcare setting is a very common occurrence but carries risks to staff and patients. The scientific study of patient handling activities and interventions to help reduce musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace is a relatively new but growing area. Recent literature reviews have identified two key factors, the lack of high quality studies and the lack of strong links between patient handling interventions and reduced musculoskeletal injury. This study has systematically reviewed the available literature and investigated the potential outcome measures used to show benefits of improved patient handling. A wide range of outcomes has been identified concentrated on the benefits to staff, patients and organisations. No methods were identified to compare different benefits, outcomes or intervention strategies. This study used mixed methods to develop a tool to compare the results of all types of interventions: a.Focus group studies in four EU countries recorded a priority list of the 12 most important outcomes from patient handling interventions b.The most suitable method for examining the 12 outcomes was identified c.The Intervention Evaluation Tool (IET) was developed as a single measurement tool d.The IET was translated and used in four EU countries to evaluate its usability and its usefulness to patient handling practitioners The EU trials and subsequent expert review have given favourable feedback for the IET. The IET creates 12 outcome evaluations with detail and differentiation, and an overall performance score to assist an organisation to target its future interventions. The method can be used to compare interventions, and the performance between organisations and countries across the EU. Though the IET needs more field trials and validity testing it is hoped that a wider application may be to create a benchmarking method that can assist in the improvement of patient handling systems across Europe