438,170 research outputs found

    Out there

    Get PDF
    Slides on how to utilize the web to create an online portfolio using social network and tumblr. Also introduction to basic CMS's including indexhibit, for setting up a simple portfolio website

    What's Out There.

    Get PDF

    dolloped out there

    Get PDF
    dolloped out ther

    Is Information Out There?

    Get PDF
    In this paper, I argue that the distinction between information and data lies at the root of much confusion that surrounds the concept of information. Although data are ā€˜out thereā€™ and concrete, informational content is abstract and always co-constituted by information agents ā€“ a set which includes at least linguistically capable human beings. Information is thus not an intrinsic property of concrete data, but rather a relational property, which relies on the existence of information agents. To reach this conclusion I first argue that the semantic content of human-generated data is co-constituted by the information agent. In the second part I broaden the scope and argue that environmental information also depends on information agents. I further consider and reject both Dretskeā€™s view of information as an objective commodity and foundational accounts of information, that take information to be the fundamental ingredient of reality

    Itā€™s One Climate Policy World Out Thereā€”Almost

    Get PDF
    In the run-up to the December 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, the authors surveyed members of the international development community with a special interest in climate change on three sets of detailed questions: (1) what action different country groups should take to limit climate change; (2) how much non-market funding there should be for emissions reductions and adaptation in developing countries, and how it should be allocated; and (3) which institutions should be involved in delivering climate assistance, and how the system should be governed. About 500 respondents from 88 countries completed the survey between November 19ā€“24, 2009. About a third of the respondents grew up in developing countries, although some of them now live in developed countries. A broad majority of respondents from both developing and developed countries held very similar views on the responsibilities of the two different country groups, including on issues that have been very controversial in the negotiations. Most favored binding commitments now by developed countries, and commitments by 2020 by ā€˜advanced developing countriesā€™ (Brazil, China, India, South Africa and others), limited use of offsets by developed countries, strict monitoring of compliance with commitments, and the use of trade measures (e.g. carbon-related tariffs) only in very narrow circumstances. Respondents from developing countries favored larger international transfers than those from developed countries, but the two groups share core ideas on how transfers should be allocated. Among institutional options for managing climate programs, a plurality of respondents from developed (48 percent) and developing (56 percent) countries preferred a UN-managed world climate fund, while many from both groups also embraced the UN Adaptation Fundā€™s approach, which is to accredit national institutions within countries which are eligible to manage implementation of projects that the Fund finances. Among approaches to governance, the most support went to the Climate Investment Fund modelā€”of equal representation of developing and developed countries on the board.carbon; climate change; copenhagen; negotiations

    Putting Yourself Out There

    Get PDF
    Ole Miss journalism students land jobs with BBDO Worldwid

    Put Yourself Out There

    Get PDF
    • ā€¦
    corecore