6 research outputs found
Improved Bounds for Drawing Trees on Fixed Points with L-shaped Edges
Let be an -node tree of maximum degree 4, and let be a set of
points in the plane with no two points on the same horizontal or vertical line.
It is an open question whether always has a planar drawing on such that
each edge is drawn as an orthogonal path with one bend (an "L-shaped" edge). By
giving new methods for drawing trees, we improve the bounds on the size of the
point set for which such drawings are possible to: for
maximum degree 4 trees; for maximum degree 3 (binary) trees; and
for perfect binary trees.
Drawing ordered trees with L-shaped edges is harder---we give an example that
cannot be done and a bound of points for L-shaped drawings of
ordered caterpillars, which contrasts with the known linear bound for unordered
caterpillars.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
Ordered Level Planarity, Geodesic Planarity and Bi-Monotonicity
We introduce and study the problem Ordered Level Planarity which asks for a
planar drawing of a graph such that vertices are placed at prescribed positions
in the plane and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. This
can be interpreted as a variant of Level Planarity in which the vertices on
each level appear in a prescribed total order. We establish a complexity
dichotomy with respect to both the maximum degree and the level-width, that is,
the maximum number of vertices that share a level. Our study of Ordered Level
Planarity is motivated by connections to several other graph drawing problems.
Geodesic Planarity asks for a planar drawing of a graph such that vertices
are placed at prescribed positions in the plane and such that every edge is
realized as a polygonal path composed of line segments with two adjacent
directions from a given set of directions symmetric with respect to the
origin. Our results on Ordered Level Planarity imply -hardness for any
with even if the given graph is a matching. Katz, Krug, Rutter and
Wolff claimed that for matchings Manhattan Geodesic Planarity, the case where
contains precisely the horizontal and vertical directions, can be solved in
polynomial time [GD'09]. Our results imply that this is incorrect unless
. Our reduction extends to settle the complexity of the Bi-Monotonicity
problem, which was proposed by Fulek, Pelsmajer, Schaefer and
\v{S}tefankovi\v{c}.
Ordered Level Planarity turns out to be a special case of T-Level Planarity,
Clustered Level Planarity and Constrained Level Planarity. Thus, our results
strengthen previous hardness results. In particular, our reduction to Clustered
Level Planarity generates instances with only two non-trivial clusters. This
answers a question posed by Angelini, Da Lozzo, Di Battista, Frati and Roselli.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
Orthogeodesic Point-Set Embedding of Trees
Let S be a set of N grid points in the plane, and let G a graph with n vertices (n ≤ N ). An orthogeodesic point-set embedding of G on S is a drawing of G such that each vertex is drawn as a point of S and each edge is an orthogonal chain with bends on grid points whose length is equal to the Manhattan distance.We study the following problem. Given a family of trees F what is the minimum value f (n) such that every n-vertex tree in F admits an orthogeodesic point-set embedding on every grid-point set of size f (n)? We provide polynomial upper bounds on f (n) for both planar and non-planar orthogeodesic point-set embeddings as well as for the case when edges are required to be L-shaped chains