46,797 research outputs found

    Optimizing Experimental Design for Comparing Models of Brain Function

    Get PDF
    This article presents the first attempt to formalize the optimization of experimental design with the aim of comparing models of brain function based on neuroimaging data. We demonstrate our approach in the context of Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM), which relates experimental manipulations to observed network dynamics (via hidden neuronal states) and provides an inference framework for selecting among candidate models. Here, we show how to optimize the sensitivity of model selection by choosing among experimental designs according to their respective model selection accuracy. Using Bayesian decision theory, we (i) derive the Laplace-Chernoff risk for model selection, (ii) disclose its relationship with classical design optimality criteria and (iii) assess its sensitivity to basic modelling assumptions. We then evaluate the approach when identifying brain networks using DCM. Monte-Carlo simulations and empirical analyses of fMRI data from a simple bimanual motor task in humans serve to demonstrate the relationship between network identification and the optimal experimental design. For example, we show that deciding whether there is a feedback connection requires shorter epoch durations, relative to asking whether there is experimentally induced change in a connection that is known to be present. Finally, we discuss limitations and potential extensions of this work

    Evaluating true BCI communication rate through mutual information and language models.

    Get PDF
    Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems are a promising means for restoring communication to patients suffering from "locked-in" syndrome. Research to improve system performance primarily focuses on means to overcome the low signal to noise ratio of electroencephalogric (EEG) recordings. However, the literature and methods are difficult to compare due to the array of evaluation metrics and assumptions underlying them, including that: 1) all characters are equally probable, 2) character selection is memoryless, and 3) errors occur completely at random. The standardization of evaluation metrics that more accurately reflect the amount of information contained in BCI language output is critical to make progress. We present a mutual information-based metric that incorporates prior information and a model of systematic errors. The parameters of a system used in one study were re-optimized, showing that the metric used in optimization significantly affects the parameter values chosen and the resulting system performance. The results of 11 BCI communication studies were then evaluated using different metrics, including those previously used in BCI literature and the newly advocated metric. Six studies' results varied based on the metric used for evaluation and the proposed metric produced results that differed from those originally published in two of the studies. Standardizing metrics to accurately reflect the rate of information transmission is critical to properly evaluate and compare BCI communication systems and advance the field in an unbiased manner

    Multi-Person Brain Activity Recognition via Comprehensive EEG Signal Analysis

    Full text link
    An electroencephalography (EEG) based brain activity recognition is a fundamental field of study for a number of significant applications such as intention prediction, appliance control, and neurological disease diagnosis in smart home and smart healthcare domains. Existing techniques mostly focus on binary brain activity recognition for a single person, which limits their deployment in wider and complex practical scenarios. Therefore, multi-person and multi-class brain activity recognition has obtained popularity recently. Another challenge faced by brain activity recognition is the low recognition accuracy due to the massive noises and the low signal-to-noise ratio in EEG signals. Moreover, the feature engineering in EEG processing is time-consuming and highly re- lies on the expert experience. In this paper, we attempt to solve the above challenges by proposing an approach which has better EEG interpretation ability via raw Electroencephalography (EEG) signal analysis for multi-person and multi-class brain activity recognition. Specifically, we analyze inter-class and inter-person EEG signal characteristics, based on which to capture the discrepancy of inter-class EEG data. Then, we adopt an Autoencoder layer to automatically refine the raw EEG signals by eliminating various artifacts. We evaluate our approach on both a public and a local EEG datasets and conduct extensive experiments to explore the effect of several factors (such as normalization methods, training data size, and Autoencoder hidden neuron size) on the recognition results. The experimental results show that our approach achieves a high accuracy comparing to competitive state-of-the-art methods, indicating its potential in promoting future research on multi-person EEG recognition.Comment: 10 page

    Optimizing Stimulation and Analysis Protocols for Neonatal fMRI

    Get PDF
    The development of brain function in young infants is poorly understood. The core challenge is that infants have a limited behavioral repertoire through which brain function can be expressed. Neuroimaging with fMRI has great potential as a way of characterizing typical development, and detecting abnormal development early. But, a number of methodological challenges must first be tackled to improve the robustness and sensitivity of neonatal fMRI. A critical one of these, addressed here, is that the hemodynamic response function (HRF) in pre-term and term neonates differs from that in adults, which has a number of implications for fMRI. We created a realistic model of noise in fMRI data, using resting-state fMRI data from infants and adults, and then conducted simulations to assess the effect of HRF of the power of different stimulation protocols and analysis assumptions (HRF modeling). We found that neonatal fMRI is most powerful if block-durations are kept at the lower range of those typically used in adults (full on/off cycle duration 25-30s). Furthermore, we show that it is important to use the age-appropriate HRF during analysis, as mismatches can lead to reduced power or even inverted signal. Where the appropriate HRF is not known (for example due to potential developmental delay), a flexible basis set performs well, and allows accurate post-hoc estimation of the HRF

    Improving treatment of glioblastoma: new insights in targeting cancer stem cells effectively

    Get PDF
    Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumour in the adult population. Despite multimodality treatment with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, outcomes are very poor, with less than 15% of patients alive after two years. Increasing evidence suggests that glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) are likely to play an important role in the biology of this disease and are involved in treatment resistance and tumour recurrence following standard therapy. My thesis aims to address two main aspects of this research area: 1) optimization of methods to evaluate treatment responses of GSCs and their differentiated counterparts (non-GSCs), with a particular focus on a tissue culture model that resembles more closely the tumoral niche; 2) characterization of cell division and centrosome cycle of GSCs, investigating possible differences between these cells and non-GSCs, that would allow the identification of targets for new therapeutic strategies against glioblastomas. In the first part of my project, I optimized a clonogenic survival assay, to compare sensitivity of GSCs and non-GSCs to various treatments, and I developed the use of a 3-dimentional tissue culture system, that allows analysis of features and radiation responses of these two subpopulations in the presence of specific microenvironmental factors from the tumoral niche. In the second part, I show that GSCs display mitotic spindle abnormalities more frequently than non-GSCs and that they have distinctive features with regards to the centrosome cycle. I also demonstrate that GSCs are more sensitive than non-GSCs to subtle changes in Aurora kinase A activity, which result in a rapid increase in polyploidy and subsequently in senescence, with a consistent reduction in clonogenic survival. Based on these findings, I propose that kinases involved in the centrosome cycle need to be explored as a novel strategy to target GSCs effectively and improve outcomes of glioblastoma patients

    The shuffle estimator for explainable variance in fMRI experiments

    Full text link
    In computational neuroscience, it is important to estimate well the proportion of signal variance in the total variance of neural activity measurements. This explainable variance measure helps neuroscientists assess the adequacy of predictive models that describe how images are encoded in the brain. Complicating the estimation problem are strong noise correlations, which may confound the neural responses corresponding to the stimuli. If not properly taken into account, the correlations could inflate the explainable variance estimates and suggest false possible prediction accuracies. We propose a novel method to estimate the explainable variance in functional MRI (fMRI) brain activity measurements when there are strong correlations in the noise. Our shuffle estimator is nonparametric, unbiased, and built upon the random effect model reflecting the randomization in the fMRI data collection process. Leveraging symmetries in the measurements, our estimator is obtained by appropriately permuting the measurement vector in such a way that the noise covariance structure is intact but the explainable variance is changed after the permutation. This difference is then used to estimate the explainable variance. We validate the properties of the proposed method in simulation experiments. For the image-fMRI data, we show that the shuffle estimates can explain the variation in prediction accuracy for voxels within the primary visual cortex (V1) better than alternative parametric methods.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/13-AOAS681 the Annals of Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
    • …
    corecore