2 research outputs found
Logical Algorithms meets CHR: A meta-complexity result for Constraint Handling Rules with rule priorities
This paper investigates the relationship between the Logical Algorithms
language (LA) of Ganzinger and McAllester and Constraint Handling Rules (CHR).
We present a translation schema from LA to CHR-rp: CHR with rule priorities,
and show that the meta-complexity theorem for LA can be applied to a subset of
CHR-rp via inverse translation. Inspired by the high-level implementation
proposal for Logical Algorithm by Ganzinger and McAllester and based on a new
scheduling algorithm, we propose an alternative implementation for CHR-rp that
gives strong complexity guarantees and results in a new and accurate
meta-complexity theorem for CHR-rp. It is furthermore shown that the
translation from Logical Algorithms to CHR-rp combined with the new CHR-rp
implementation, satisfies the required complexity for the Logical Algorithms
meta-complexity result to hold.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP
Optimizing Compilation and Computational Complexity of Constraint Handling Rules
Constraint Handling Rules [1, 2] is a high-level programming language extension based on multi-headed committed-choice multiset rewrite rules. It can be used as a stand-alone language or as an extension to an existing host language. CHR systems have been implemented for nearly every Prolog system, and there ar