2,579 research outputs found
Optimal Auctions for Correlated Buyers with Sampling
Cr\'emer and McLean [1985] showed that, when buyers' valuations are drawn
from a correlated distribution, an auction with full knowledge on the
distribution can extract the full social surplus. We study whether this
phenomenon persists when the auctioneer has only incomplete knowledge of the
distribution, represented by a finite family of candidate distributions, and
has sample access to the real distribution. We show that the naive approach
which uses samples to distinguish candidate distributions may fail, whereas an
extended version of the Cr\'emer-McLean auction simultaneously extracts full
social surplus under each candidate distribution. With an algebraic argument,
we give a tight bound on the number of samples needed by this auction, which is
the difference between the number of candidate distributions and the dimension
of the linear space they span
Improved Revenue Bounds for Posted-Price and Second-Price Mechanisms
We study revenue maximization through sequential posted-price (SPP)
mechanisms in single-dimensional settings with buyers and independent but
not necessarily identical value distributions. We construct the SPP mechanisms
by considering the best of two simple pricing rules: one that imitates the
revenue optimal mchanism, namely the Myersonian mechanism, via the taxation
principle and the other that posts a uniform price. Our pricing rules are
rather generalizable and yield the first improvement over long-established
approximation factors in several settings. We design factor-revealing
mathematical programs that crisply capture the approximation factor of our SPP
mechanism. In the single-unit setting, our SPP mechanism yields a better
approximation factor than the state of the art prior to our work (Azar,
Chiplunkar & Kaplan, 2018). In the multi-unit setting, our SPP mechanism yields
the first improved approximation factor over the state of the art after over
nine years (Yan, 2011 and Chakraborty et al., 2010). Our results on SPP
mechanisms immediately imply improved performance guarantees for the equivalent
free-order prophet inequality problem. In the position auction setting, our SPP
mechanism yields the first higher-than approximation factor. In eager
second-price (ESP) auctions, our two simple pricing rules lead to the first
improved approximation factor that is strictly greater than what is obtained by
the SPP mechanism in the single-unit setting.Comment: Accepted to Operations Researc
Mechanisms for Risk Averse Agents, Without Loss
Auctions in which agents' payoffs are random variables have received
increased attention in recent years. In particular, recent work in algorithmic
mechanism design has produced mechanisms employing internal randomization,
partly in response to limitations on deterministic mechanisms imposed by
computational complexity. For many of these mechanisms, which are often
referred to as truthful-in-expectation, incentive compatibility is contingent
on the assumption that agents are risk-neutral. These mechanisms have been
criticized on the grounds that this assumption is too strong, because "real"
agents are typically risk averse, and moreover their precise attitude towards
risk is typically unknown a-priori. In response, researchers in algorithmic
mechanism design have sought the design of universally-truthful mechanisms ---
mechanisms for which incentive-compatibility makes no assumptions regarding
agents' attitudes towards risk.
We show that any truthful-in-expectation mechanism can be generically
transformed into a mechanism that is incentive compatible even when agents are
risk averse, without modifying the mechanism's allocation rule. The transformed
mechanism does not require reporting of agents' risk profiles. Equivalently,
our result can be stated as follows: Every (randomized) allocation rule that is
implementable in dominant strategies when players are risk neutral is also
implementable when players are endowed with an arbitrary and unknown concave
utility function for money.Comment: Presented at the workshop on risk aversion in algorithmic game theory
and mechanism design, held in conjunction with EC 201
Simple Mechanisms for a Subadditive Buyer and Applications to Revenue Monotonicity
We study the revenue maximization problem of a seller with n heterogeneous
items for sale to a single buyer whose valuation function for sets of items is
unknown and drawn from some distribution D. We show that if D is a distribution
over subadditive valuations with independent items, then the better of pricing
each item separately or pricing only the grand bundle achieves a
constant-factor approximation to the revenue of the optimal mechanism. This
includes buyers who are k-demand, additive up to a matroid constraint, or
additive up to constraints of any downwards-closed set system (and whose values
for the individual items are sampled independently), as well as buyers who are
fractionally subadditive with item multipliers drawn independently. Our proof
makes use of the core-tail decomposition framework developed in prior work
showing similar results for the significantly simpler class of additive buyers
[LY13, BILW14].
In the second part of the paper, we develop a connection between
approximately optimal simple mechanisms and approximate revenue monotonicity
with respect to buyers' valuations. Revenue non-monotonicity is the phenomenon
that sometimes strictly increasing buyers' values for every set can strictly
decrease the revenue of the optimal mechanism [HR12]. Using our main result, we
derive a bound on how bad this degradation can be (and dub such a bound a proof
of approximate revenue monotonicity); we further show that better bounds on
approximate monotonicity imply a better analysis of our simple mechanisms.Comment: Updated title and body to version included in TEAC. Adapted Theorem
5.2 to accommodate \eta-BIC auctions (versus exactly BIC
The Sample Complexity of Auctions with Side Information
Traditionally, the Bayesian optimal auction design problem has been
considered either when the bidder values are i.i.d, or when each bidder is
individually identifiable via her value distribution. The latter is a
reasonable approach when the bidders can be classified into a few categories,
but there are many instances where the classification of bidders is a
continuum. For example, the classification of the bidders may be based on their
annual income, their propensity to buy an item based on past behavior, or in
the case of ad auctions, the click through rate of their ads. We introduce an
alternate model that captures this aspect, where bidders are a priori
identical, but can be distinguished based (only) on some side information the
auctioneer obtains at the time of the auction. We extend the sample complexity
approach of Dhangwatnotai et al. and Cole and Roughgarden to this model and
obtain almost matching upper and lower bounds. As an aside, we obtain a revenue
monotonicity lemma which may be of independent interest. We also show how to
use Empirical Risk Minimization techniques to improve the sample complexity
bound of Cole and Roughgarden for the non-identical but independent value
distribution case.Comment: A version of this paper appeared in STOC 201
- …