4,237 research outputs found
Double Auctions in Markets for Multiple Kinds of Goods
Motivated by applications such as stock exchanges and spectrum auctions,
there is a growing interest in mechanisms for arranging trade in two-sided
markets. Existing mechanisms are either not truthful, or do not guarantee an
asymptotically-optimal gain-from-trade, or rely on a prior on the traders'
valuations, or operate in limited settings such as a single kind of good. We
extend the random market-halving technique used in earlier works to markets
with multiple kinds of goods, where traders have gross-substitute valuations.
We present MIDA: a Multi Item-kind Double-Auction mechanism. It is prior-free,
truthful, strongly-budget-balanced, and guarantees near-optimal gain from trade
when market sizes of all goods grow to at a similar rate.Comment: Full version of IJCAI-18 paper, with 2 figures. Previous names:
"MIDA: A Multi Item-type Double-Auction Mechanism", "A Random-Sampling
Double-Auction Mechanism". 10 page
Multi-unit Bilateral Trade
We characterise the set of dominant strategy incentive compatible (DSIC),
strongly budget balanced (SBB), and ex-post individually rational (IR)
mechanisms for the multi-unit bilateral trade setting. In such a setting there
is a single buyer and a single seller who holds a finite number k of identical
items. The mechanism has to decide how many units of the item are transferred
from the seller to the buyer and how much money is transferred from the buyer
to the seller. We consider two classes of valuation functions for the buyer and
seller: Valuations that are increasing in the number of units in possession,
and the more specific class of valuations that are increasing and submodular.
Furthermore, we present some approximation results about the performance of
certain such mechanisms, in terms of social welfare: For increasing submodular
valuation functions, we show the existence of a deterministic 2-approximation
mechanism and a randomised e/(1-e) approximation mechanism, matching the best
known bounds for the single-item setting
Social Welfare in One-sided Matching Markets without Money
We study social welfare in one-sided matching markets where the goal is to
efficiently allocate n items to n agents that each have a complete, private
preference list and a unit demand over the items. Our focus is on allocation
mechanisms that do not involve any monetary payments. We consider two natural
measures of social welfare: the ordinal welfare factor which measures the
number of agents that are at least as happy as in some unknown, arbitrary
benchmark allocation, and the linear welfare factor which assumes an agent's
utility linearly decreases down his preference lists, and measures the total
utility to that achieved by an optimal allocation. We analyze two matching
mechanisms which have been extensively studied by economists. The first
mechanism is the random serial dictatorship (RSD) where agents are ordered in
accordance with a randomly chosen permutation, and are successively allocated
their best choice among the unallocated items. The second mechanism is the
probabilistic serial (PS) mechanism of Bogomolnaia and Moulin [8], which
computes a fractional allocation that can be expressed as a convex combination
of integral allocations. The welfare factor of a mechanism is the infimum over
all instances. For RSD, we show that the ordinal welfare factor is
asymptotically 1/2, while the linear welfare factor lies in the interval [.526,
2/3]. For PS, we show that the ordinal welfare factor is also 1/2 while the
linear welfare factor is roughly 2/3. To our knowledge, these results are the
first non-trivial performance guarantees for these natural mechanisms
Chain: A Dynamic Double Auction Framework for Matching Patient Agents
In this paper we present and evaluate a general framework for the design of
truthful auctions for matching agents in a dynamic, two-sided market. A single
commodity, such as a resource or a task, is bought and sold by multiple buyers
and sellers that arrive and depart over time. Our algorithm, Chain, provides
the first framework that allows a truthful dynamic double auction (DA) to be
constructed from a truthful, single-period (i.e. static) double-auction rule.
The pricing and matching method of the Chain construction is unique amongst
dynamic-auction rules that adopt the same building block. We examine
experimentally the allocative efficiency of Chain when instantiated on various
single-period rules, including the canonical McAfee double-auction rule. For a
baseline we also consider non-truthful double auctions populated with
zero-intelligence plus"-style learning agents. Chain-based auctions perform
well in comparison with other schemes, especially as arrival intensity falls
and agent valuations become more volatile
Designing Coalition-Proof Reverse Auctions over Continuous Goods
This paper investigates reverse auctions that involve continuous values of
different types of goods, general nonconvex constraints, and second stage
costs. We seek to design the payment rules and conditions under which
coalitions of participants cannot influence the auction outcome in order to
obtain higher collective utility. Under the incentive-compatible
Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism, we show that coalition-proof outcomes are
achieved if the submitted bids are convex and the constraint sets are of a
polymatroid-type. These conditions, however, do not capture the complexity of
the general class of reverse auctions under consideration. By relaxing the
property of incentive-compatibility, we investigate further payment rules that
are coalition-proof without any extra conditions on the submitted bids and the
constraint sets. Since calculating the payments directly for these mechanisms
is computationally difficult for auctions involving many participants, we
present two computationally efficient methods. Our results are verified with
several case studies based on electricity market data
Mechanism design for dynamic double auctions
Cette thèse a pour objet de concevoir des mécanismes d'allocation dans le contexte des enchères doubles dynamiques (achats groupés, bourses électroniques). Le principal défi inhérent à la conception de tels mécanismes est d'aboutir à un résultat socialement optimal alors que la dynamique induit une incertitude sur les arrivées et départs des participants de l'enchère ainsi que sur les valuations qui peuvent être fluctuantes. Dans cette thèse, nous proposons des mécanismes qui sont efficaces, incitatifs et garantissant l'équilibre du budget. La définition de ces mécanismes s'appuient sur les algorithmes d'appareillage pour des graphes bipartis (technique d'augmentation et réduction) ainsi que sur une méthode générale prenant en compte le comportement des participants.This thesis addresses the problem of designing mechanisms that lead to socially desirable outcomes in dynamic double auction markets such as stock exchanges and group buying. The main challenge of the design is dealing with the uncertainty posed by the participants who are dynamically arriving and departing and their valuations vary over time. The thesis demonstrates the difficulties in designing mechanisms with desirable properties such as truthfulness, efficiency and budget balance. It also provides dedicated mechanisms satisfying those properties by using augmentation, reduction and behaviour-based approaches
- …