Online Bin Packing with Advice

We consider the online bin packing problem under the advice complexity model where the 'online constraint' is relaxed and an algorithm receives partial information about the future requests. We provide tight upper and lower bounds for the amount of advice an algorithm needs to achieve an optimal packing. We also introduce an algorithm that, when provided with log n + o(log n) bits of advice, achieves a competitive ratio of 3/2 for the general problem. This algorithm is simple and is expected to find real-world applications. We introduce another algorithm that receives 2n + o(n) bits of advice and achieves a competitive ratio of 4/3 + {\epsilon}. Finally, we provide a lower bound argument that implies that advice of linear size is required for an algorithm to achieve a competitive ratio better than 9/8.Comment: 19 pages, 1 figure (2 subfigures

Online Bin Packing with Advice

We consider the online bin packing problem under the advice complexity model where the "online constraint" is relaxed and an algorithm receives partial information about the future requests. We provide tight upper and lower bounds for the amount of advice an algorithm needs to achieve an optimal packing. We also introduce an algorithm that, when provided with log(n)+o(log(n)) bits of advice, achieves a competitive ratio of 3/2 for the general problem. This algorithm is simple and is expected to find real-world applications. We introduce another algorithm that receives 2n+o(n) bits of advice and achieves a competitive ratio of 4/3+e. Finally, we provide a lower bound argument that implies that advice of linear size is required for an algorithm to achieve a competitive ratio better than 9/8

On the Power of Advice and Randomization for Online Bipartite Matching

While randomized online algorithms have access to a sequence of uniform random bits, deterministic online algorithms with advice have access to a sequence of advice bits, i.e., bits that are set by an all powerful oracle prior to the processing of the request sequence. Advice bits are at least as helpful as random bits, but how helpful are they? In this work, we investigate the power of advice bits and random bits for online maximum bipartite matching (MBM). The well-known Karp-Vazirani-Vazirani algorithm is an optimal randomized $(1-\frac{1}{e})$-competitive algorithm for \textsc{MBM} that requires access to $\Theta(n \log n)$ uniform random bits. We show that $\Omega(\log(\frac{1}{\epsilon}) n)$ advice bits are necessary and $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon^5} n)$ sufficient in order to obtain a $(1-\epsilon)$-competitive deterministic advice algorithm. Furthermore, for a large natural class of deterministic advice algorithms, we prove that $\Omega(\log \log \log n)$ advice bits are required in order to improve on the $\frac{1}{2}$-competitiveness of the best deterministic online algorithm, while it is known that $O(\log n)$ bits are sufficient. Last, we give a randomized online algorithm that uses $c n$ random bits, for integers $c \ge 1$, and a competitive ratio that approaches $1-\frac{1}{e}$ very quickly as $c$ is increasing. For example if $c = 10$, then the difference between $1-\frac{1}{e}$ and the achieved competitive ratio is less than $0.0002$

Lower bounds for several online variants of bin packing

We consider several previously studied online variants of bin packing and prove new and improved lower bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratios for them. For that, we use a method of fully adaptive constructions. In particular, we improve the lower bound for the asymptotic competitive ratio of online square packing significantly, raising it from roughly 1.68 to above 1.75.Comment: WAOA 201

Online Computation with Untrusted Advice

The advice model of online computation captures a setting in which the algorithm is given some partial information concerning the request sequence. This paradigm allows to establish tradeoffs between the amount of this additional information and the performance of the online algorithm. However, if the advice is corrupt or, worse, if it comes from a malicious source, the algorithm may perform poorly. In this work, we study online computation in a setting in which the advice is provided by an untrusted source. Our objective is to quantify the impact of untrusted advice so as to design and analyze online algorithms that are robust and perform well even when the advice is generated in a malicious, adversarial manner. To this end, we focus on well-studied online problems such as ski rental, online bidding, bin packing, and list update. For ski-rental and online bidding, we show how to obtain algorithms that are Pareto-optimal with respect to the competitive ratios achieved; this improves upon the framework of Purohit et al. [NeurIPS 2018] in which Pareto-optimality is not necessarily guaranteed. For bin packing and list update, we give online algorithms with worst-case tradeoffs in their competitiveness, depending on whether the advice is trusted or not; this is motivated by work of Lykouris and Vassilvitskii [ICML 2018] on the paging problem, but in which the competitiveness depends on the reliability of the advice. Furthermore, we demonstrate how to prove lower bounds, within this model, on the tradeoff between the number of advice bits and the competitiveness of any online algorithm. Last, we study the effect of randomization: here we show that for ski-rental there is a randomized algorithm that Pareto-dominates any deterministic algorithm with advice of any size. We also show that a single random bit is not always inferior to a single advice bit, as it happens in the standard model

On the List Update Problem with Advice

We study the online list update problem under the advice model of computation. Under this model, an online algorithm receives partial information about the unknown parts of the input in the form of some bits of advice generated by a benevolent offline oracle. We show that advice of linear size is required and sufficient for a deterministic algorithm to achieve an optimal solution or even a competitive ratio better than $15/14$. On the other hand, we show that surprisingly two bits of advice are sufficient to break the lower bound of $2$ on the competitive ratio of deterministic online algorithms and achieve a deterministic algorithm with a competitive ratio of $5/3$. In this upper-bound argument, the bits of advice determine the algorithm with smaller cost among three classical online algorithms, TIMESTAMP and two members of the MTF2 family of algorithms. We also show that MTF2 algorithms are $2.5$-competitive

Optimal Online Edge Coloring of Planar Graphs with Advice

Using the framework of advice complexity, we study the amount of knowledge about the future that an online algorithm needs to color the edges of a graph optimally, i.e., using as few colors as possible. For graphs of maximum degree $\Delta$, it follows from Vizing's Theorem that $O(m\log \Delta)$ bits of advice suffice to achieve optimality, where $m$ is the number of edges. We show that for graphs of bounded degeneracy (a class of graphs including e.g. trees and planar graphs), only $O(m)$ bits of advice are needed to compute an optimal solution online, independently of how large $\Delta$ is. On the other hand, we show that $\Omega (m)$ bits of advice are necessary just to achieve a competitive ratio better than that of the best deterministic online algorithm without advice. Furthermore, we consider algorithms which use a fixed number of advice bits per edge (our algorithm for graphs of bounded degeneracy belongs to this class of algorithms). We show that for bipartite graphs, any such algorithm must use at least $\Omega(m\log \Delta)$ bits of advice to achieve optimality.Comment: CIAC 201