678 research outputs found
On Tackling the Limits of Resolution in SAT Solving
The practical success of Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers stems from the
CDCL (Conflict-Driven Clause Learning) approach to SAT solving. However, from a
propositional proof complexity perspective, CDCL is no more powerful than the
resolution proof system, for which many hard examples exist. This paper
proposes a new problem transformation, which enables reducing the decision
problem for formulas in conjunctive normal form (CNF) to the problem of solving
maximum satisfiability over Horn formulas. Given the new transformation, the
paper proves a polynomial bound on the number of MaxSAT resolution steps for
pigeonhole formulas. This result is in clear contrast with earlier results on
the length of proofs of MaxSAT resolution for pigeonhole formulas. The paper
also establishes the same polynomial bound in the case of modern core-guided
MaxSAT solvers. Experimental results, obtained on CNF formulas known to be hard
for CDCL SAT solvers, show that these can be efficiently solved with modern
MaxSAT solvers
Low-rank semidefinite programming for the MAX2SAT problem
This paper proposes a new algorithm for solving MAX2SAT problems based on
combining search methods with semidefinite programming approaches. Semidefinite
programming techniques are well-known as a theoretical tool for approximating
maximum satisfiability problems, but their application has traditionally been
very limited by their speed and randomized nature. Our approach overcomes this
difficult by using a recent approach to low-rank semidefinite programming,
specialized to work in an incremental fashion suitable for use in an exact
search algorithm. The method can be used both within complete or incomplete
solver, and we demonstrate on a variety of problems from recent competitions.
Our experiments show that the approach is faster (sometimes by orders of
magnitude) than existing state-of-the-art complete and incomplete solvers,
representing a substantial advance in search methods specialized for MAX2SAT
problems.Comment: Accepted at AAAI'19. The code can be found at
https://github.com/locuslab/mixsa
Efficient Generation of Craig Interpolants in Satisfiability Modulo Theories
The problem of computing Craig Interpolants has recently received a lot of
interest. In this paper, we address the problem of efficient generation of
interpolants for some important fragments of first order logic, which are
amenable for effective decision procedures, called Satisfiability Modulo Theory
solvers.
We make the following contributions.
First, we provide interpolation procedures for several basic theories of
interest: the theories of linear arithmetic over the rationals, difference
logic over rationals and integers, and UTVPI over rationals and integers.
Second, we define a novel approach to interpolate combinations of theories,
that applies to the Delayed Theory Combination approach.
Efficiency is ensured by the fact that the proposed interpolation algorithms
extend state of the art algorithms for Satisfiability Modulo Theories. Our
experimental evaluation shows that the MathSAT SMT solver can produce
interpolants with minor overhead in search, and much more efficiently than
other competitor solvers.Comment: submitted to ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL
Sciduction: Combining Induction, Deduction, and Structure for Verification and Synthesis
Even with impressive advances in automated formal methods, certain problems
in system verification and synthesis remain challenging. Examples include the
verification of quantitative properties of software involving constraints on
timing and energy consumption, and the automatic synthesis of systems from
specifications. The major challenges include environment modeling,
incompleteness in specifications, and the complexity of underlying decision
problems.
This position paper proposes sciduction, an approach to tackle these
challenges by integrating inductive inference, deductive reasoning, and
structure hypotheses. Deductive reasoning, which leads from general rules or
concepts to conclusions about specific problem instances, includes techniques
such as logical inference and constraint solving. Inductive inference, which
generalizes from specific instances to yield a concept, includes algorithmic
learning from examples. Structure hypotheses are used to define the class of
artifacts, such as invariants or program fragments, generated during
verification or synthesis. Sciduction constrains inductive and deductive
reasoning using structure hypotheses, and actively combines inductive and
deductive reasoning: for instance, deductive techniques generate examples for
learning, and inductive reasoning is used to guide the deductive engines.
We illustrate this approach with three applications: (i) timing analysis of
software; (ii) synthesis of loop-free programs, and (iii) controller synthesis
for hybrid systems. Some future applications are also discussed
- …