1,750 research outputs found
Conditional Lower Bounds for Space/Time Tradeoffs
In recent years much effort has been concentrated towards achieving
polynomial time lower bounds on algorithms for solving various well-known
problems. A useful technique for showing such lower bounds is to prove them
conditionally based on well-studied hardness assumptions such as 3SUM, APSP,
SETH, etc. This line of research helps to obtain a better understanding of the
complexity inside P.
A related question asks to prove conditional space lower bounds on data
structures that are constructed to solve certain algorithmic tasks after an
initial preprocessing stage. This question received little attention in
previous research even though it has potential strong impact.
In this paper we address this question and show that surprisingly many of the
well-studied hard problems that are known to have conditional polynomial time
lower bounds are also hard when concerning space. This hardness is shown as a
tradeoff between the space consumed by the data structure and the time needed
to answer queries. The tradeoff may be either smooth or admit one or more
singularity points.
We reveal interesting connections between different space hardness
conjectures and present matching upper bounds. We also apply these hardness
conjectures to both static and dynamic problems and prove their conditional
space hardness.
We believe that this novel framework of polynomial space conjectures can play
an important role in expressing polynomial space lower bounds of many important
algorithmic problems. Moreover, it seems that it can also help in achieving a
better understanding of the hardness of their corresponding problems in terms
of time
Finding Simple Shortest Paths and Cycles
The problem of finding multiple simple shortest paths in a weighted directed
graph has many applications, and is considerably more difficult than
the corresponding problem when cycles are allowed in the paths. Even for a
single source-sink pair, it is known that two simple shortest paths cannot be
found in time polynomially smaller than (where ) unless the
All-Pairs Shortest Paths problem can be solved in a similar time bound. The
latter is a well-known open problem in algorithm design. We consider the
all-pairs version of the problem, and we give a new algorithm to find
simple shortest paths for all pairs of vertices. For , our algorithm runs
in time (where ), which is almost the same bound as
for the single pair case, and for we improve earlier bounds. Our approach
is based on forming suitable path extensions to find simple shortest paths;
this method is different from the `detour finding' technique used in most of
the prior work on simple shortest paths, replacement paths, and distance
sensitivity oracles.
Enumerating simple cycles is a well-studied classical problem. We present new
algorithms for generating simple cycles and simple paths in in
non-decreasing order of their weights; the algorithm for generating simple
paths is much faster, and uses another variant of path extensions. We also give
hardness results for sparse graphs, relative to the complexity of computing a
minimum weight cycle in a graph, for several variants of problems related to
finding simple paths and cycles.Comment: The current version includes new results for undirected graphs. In
Section 4, the notion of an (m,n) reduction is generalized to an f(m,n)
reductio
Sparse Fault-Tolerant BFS Trees
This paper addresses the problem of designing a sparse {\em fault-tolerant}
BFS tree, or {\em FT-BFS tree} for short, namely, a sparse subgraph of the
given network such that subsequent to the failure of a single edge or
vertex, the surviving part of still contains a BFS spanning tree for
(the surviving part of) . Our main results are as follows. We present an
algorithm that for every -vertex graph and source node constructs a
(single edge failure) FT-BFS tree rooted at with O(n \cdot
\min\{\Depth(s), \sqrt{n}\}) edges, where \Depth(s) is the depth of the BFS
tree rooted at . This result is complemented by a matching lower bound,
showing that there exist -vertex graphs with a source node for which any
edge (or vertex) FT-BFS tree rooted at has edges. We then
consider {\em fault-tolerant multi-source BFS trees}, or {\em FT-MBFS trees}
for short, aiming to provide (following a failure) a BFS tree rooted at each
source for some subset of sources . Again, tight bounds
are provided, showing that there exists a poly-time algorithm that for every
-vertex graph and source set of size constructs a
(single failure) FT-MBFS tree from each source , with
edges, and on the other hand there exist
-vertex graphs with source sets of cardinality , on
which any FT-MBFS tree from has edges.
Finally, we propose an approximation algorithm for constructing
FT-BFS and FT-MBFS structures. The latter is complemented by a hardness result
stating that there exists no approximation algorithm for these
problems under standard complexity assumptions
Hardness of Exact Distance Queries in Sparse Graphs Through Hub Labeling
A distance labeling scheme is an assignment of bit-labels to the vertices of
an undirected, unweighted graph such that the distance between any pair of
vertices can be decoded solely from their labels. An important class of
distance labeling schemes is that of hub labelings, where a node
stores its distance to the so-called hubs , chosen so that for
any there is belonging to some shortest
path. Notice that for most existing graph classes, the best distance labelling
constructions existing use at some point a hub labeling scheme at least as a
key building block. Our interest lies in hub labelings of sparse graphs, i.e.,
those with , for which we show a lowerbound of
for the average size of the hubsets.
Additionally, we show a hub-labeling construction for sparse graphs of average
size for some , where is the
so-called Ruzsa-Szemer{\'e}di function, linked to structure of induced
matchings in dense graphs. This implies that further improving the lower bound
on hub labeling size to would require a
breakthrough in the study of lower bounds on , which have resisted
substantial improvement in the last 70 years. For general distance labeling of
sparse graphs, we show a lowerbound of , where is the communication complexity of the
Sum-Index problem over . Our results suggest that the best achievable
hub-label size and distance-label size in sparse graphs may be
for some
- …