31 research outputs found
Generalized Second Price Auction with Probabilistic Broad Match
Generalized Second Price (GSP) auctions are widely used by search engines
today to sell their ad slots. Most search engines have supported broad match
between queries and bid keywords when executing GSP auctions, however, it has
been revealed that GSP auction with the standard broad-match mechanism they are
currently using (denoted as SBM-GSP) has several theoretical drawbacks (e.g.,
its theoretical properties are known only for the single-slot case and
full-information setting, and even in this simple setting, the corresponding
worst-case social welfare can be rather bad). To address this issue, we propose
a novel broad-match mechanism, which we call the Probabilistic Broad-Match
(PBM) mechanism. Different from SBM that puts together the ads bidding on all
the keywords matched to a given query for the GSP auction, the GSP with PBM
(denoted as PBM-GSP) randomly samples a keyword according to a predefined
probability distribution and only runs the GSP auction for the ads bidding on
this sampled keyword. We perform a comprehensive study on the theoretical
properties of the PBM-GSP. Specifically, we study its social welfare in the
worst equilibrium, in both full-information and Bayesian settings. The results
show that PBM-GSP can generate larger welfare than SBM-GSP under mild
conditions. Furthermore, we also study the revenue guarantee for PBM-GSP in
Bayesian setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work on
broad-match mechanisms for GSP that goes beyond the single-slot case and the
full-information setting
Approximately Optimal Mechanism Design: Motivation, Examples, and Lessons Learned
Optimal mechanism design enjoys a beautiful and well-developed theory, and
also a number of killer applications. Rules of thumb produced by the field
influence everything from how governments sell wireless spectrum licenses to
how the major search engines auction off online advertising. There are,
however, some basic problems for which the traditional optimal mechanism design
approach is ill-suited --- either because it makes overly strong assumptions,
or because it advocates overly complex designs. The thesis of this paper is
that approximately optimal mechanisms allow us to reason about fundamental
questions that seem out of reach of the traditional theory.
This survey has three main parts. The first part describes the approximately
optimal mechanism design paradigm --- how it works, and what we aim to learn by
applying it. The second and third parts of the survey cover two case studies,
where we instantiate the general design paradigm to investigate two basic
questions. In the first example, we consider revenue maximization in a
single-item auction with heterogeneous bidders. Our goal is to understand if
complexity --- in the sense of detailed distributional knowledge --- is an
essential feature of good auctions for this problem, or alternatively if there
are simpler auctions that are near-optimal. The second example considers
welfare maximization with multiple items. Our goal here is similar in spirit:
when is complexity --- in the form of high-dimensional bid spaces --- an
essential feature of every auction that guarantees reasonable welfare? Are
there interesting cases where low-dimensional bid spaces suffice?Comment: Based on a talk given by the author at the 15th ACM Conference on
Economics and Computation (EC), June 201
Welfare guarantees for proportional allocations
According to the proportional allocation mechanism from the network
optimization literature, users compete for a divisible resource -- such as
bandwidth -- by submitting bids. The mechanism allocates to each user a
fraction of the resource that is proportional to her bid and collects an amount
equal to her bid as payment. Since users act as utility-maximizers, this
naturally defines a proportional allocation game. Recently, Syrgkanis and
Tardos (STOC 2013) quantified the inefficiency of equilibria in this game with
respect to the social welfare and presented a lower bound of 26.8% on the price
of anarchy over coarse-correlated and Bayes-Nash equilibria in the full and
incomplete information settings, respectively. In this paper, we improve this
bound to 50% over both equilibrium concepts. Our analysis is simpler and,
furthermore, we argue that it cannot be improved by arguments that do not take
the equilibrium structure into account. We also extend it to settings with
budget constraints where we show the first constant bound (between 36% and 50%)
on the price of anarchy of the corresponding game with respect to an effective
welfare benchmark that takes budgets into account.Comment: 15 page
Expressiveness and Robustness of First-Price Position Auctions
Since economic mechanisms are often applied to very different instances of
the same problem, it is desirable to identify mechanisms that work well in a
wide range of circumstances. We pursue this goal for a position auction setting
and specifically seek mechanisms that guarantee good outcomes under both
complete and incomplete information. A variant of the generalized first-price
mechanism with multi-dimensional bids turns out to be the only standard
mechanism able to achieve this goal, even when types are one-dimensional. The
fact that expressiveness beyond the type space is both necessary and sufficient
for this kind of robustness provides an interesting counterpoint to previous
work on position auctions that has highlighted the benefits of simplicity. From
a technical perspective our results are interesting because they establish
equilibrium existence for a multi-dimensional bid space, where standard
techniques break down. The structure of the equilibrium bids moreover provides
an intuitive explanation for why first-price payments may be able to support
equilibria in a wider range of circumstances than second-price payments
Smoothness for Simultaneous Composition of Mechanisms with Admission
We study social welfare of learning outcomes in mechanisms with admission. In
our repeated game there are bidders and mechanisms, and in each round
each mechanism is available for each bidder only with a certain probability.
Our scenario is an elementary case of simple mechanism design with incomplete
information, where availabilities are bidder types. It captures natural
applications in online markets with limited supply and can be used to model
access of unreliable channels in wireless networks.
If mechanisms satisfy a smoothness guarantee, existing results show that
learning outcomes recover a significant fraction of the optimal social welfare.
These approaches, however, have serious drawbacks in terms of plausibility and
computational complexity. Also, the guarantees apply only when availabilities
are stochastically independent among bidders.
In contrast, we propose an alternative approach where each bidder uses a
single no-regret learning algorithm and applies it in all rounds. This results
in what we call availability-oblivious coarse correlated equilibria. It
exponentially decreases the learning burden, simplifies implementation (e.g.,
as a method for channel access in wireless devices), and thereby addresses some
of the concerns about Bayes-Nash equilibria and learning outcomes in Bayesian
settings. Our main results are general composition theorems for smooth
mechanisms when valuation functions of bidders are lattice-submodular. They
rely on an interesting connection to the notion of correlation gap of
submodular functions over product lattices.Comment: Full version of WINE 2016 pape