1 research outputs found
On the complexity of probabilistic trials for hidden satisfiability problems
What is the minimum amount of information and time needed to solve 2SAT? When
the instance is known, it can be solved in polynomial time, but is this also
possible without knowing the instance? Bei, Chen and Zhang (STOC '13)
considered a model where the input is accessed by proposing possible
assignments to a special oracle. This oracle, on encountering some constraint
unsatisfied by the proposal, returns only the constraint index. It turns out
that, in this model, even 1SAT cannot be solved in polynomial time unless P=NP.
Hence, we consider a model in which the input is accessed by proposing
probability distributions over assignments to the variables. The oracle then
returns the index of the constraint that is most likely to be violated by this
distribution. We show that the information obtained this way is sufficient to
solve 1SAT in polynomial time, even when the clauses can be repeated. For 2SAT,
as long as there are no repeated clauses, in polynomial time we can even learn
an equivalent formula for the hidden instance and hence also solve it.
Furthermore, we extend these results to the quantum regime. We show that in
this setting 1QSAT can be solved in polynomial time up to constant precision,
and 2QSAT can be learnt in polynomial time up to inverse polynomial precision.Comment: 24 pages, 2 figures. To appear in the 41st International Symposium on
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Scienc